ISSN 0006-2979, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2026, Vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 658-675 © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2026.
658
REVIEW
Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Is a Key Signaling Molecule
in Normal Conditions and in Multiple Sclerosis
Dmitry A. Ganin
1,a
* and Mariya N. Zakharova
1
1
Russian Center of Neurology and Neurosciences, 125357 Moscow, Russia
a
e-mail: ganin.d.a@neurology.ru
Received January 20, 2026
Revised April 13, 2026
Accepted April 14, 2026
AbstractSphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is one of the most extensively studied bioactive signaling molecules
of sphingolipid metabolism, which plays a pivotal role in regulating numerous processes in the central ner-
vous system and immune system. Acting as an extracellular ligand for five subtypes of G-protein-coupled
receptors (S1PR
1
-S1PR
5
) as well as an intracellular metabolic mediator, S1P controls lymphocyte migration,
blood-brain barrier permeability, survival and differentiation of oligodendrocytes, reactivity of astrocytes
and microglia, and balance between inflammation, neurodegeneration, and neuroprotection. In pathogen-
esis of the demyelinative diseases, particularly multiple sclerosis, disruption of the “sphingolipid rheostat”
is observed – a shift toward predominance of pro-apoptotic ceramides and relative decrease in the S1P
levels, which promotes prevalence of the neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes over remy-
elination. This review summarizes current data on the structure, metabolism, and intra- and extracellular
signaling pathways of S1P, its dual role under physiological conditions and in multiple sclerosis, and an-
alyzes approaches to pharmacological modulation of S1P signaling pathways, highlighting the prospects of
selective targeted therapy aimed at immunomodulation, neuroprotection, and stimulation of remyelination.
DOI: 10.1134/S0006297926600122
Keywords: sphingosine-1-phosphate, signaling molecule, sphingolipids, S1P receptors, myelin, demyelination,
remyelination, multiple sclerosis, neuroinflammation, S1P receptor modulators, sphingolipid rheostat
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
ROLE OF SPHINGOLIPIDS
AND SPHINGOSINE-1-PHOSPHATE
AS STRUCTURAL AND SIGNALLING
COMPONENTS OF MYELIN
Demyelinative diseases of the central nervous sys-
tem (CNS) comprise a broad spectrum of neurological
disorders that lead to significant disability among the
young working-age population. According to the latest
data, published in 2024 as part of the joint project
between the Multiple Sclerosis International Federa-
tion and the World Health Organization, approximate-
ly 2.9 million people worldwide suffer from multiple
sclerosis (MS). It has been shown that the prevalence
of MS increased by 58% between 2013 and 2020  [1].
Analysis of epidemiological data allows us to predict
a further increase in prevalence and incidence ofMS.
Current trends highlight high relevance of demye-
linative diseases; in this context, the search for new
therapeutic targets that play a pivotal role in the im-
munopathogenesis of the disease attracts particular
interest. Molecules possessing signaling properties
and regulating a large number of metabolic pathways
are best suited to act as such targets, as they are ca-
pable of influencing multiple aspects of pathogenesis.
Demyelination is an autoimmune process involving
destruction of the myelin sheath – a multilayered
membrane structure formed by the spirally wrapped
plasma membranes of glial cells: oligodendrocytes in
the CNS and Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous
system (PNS). Each layer of the myelin sheath com-
prises two lipid bilayers separated by protein com-
ponents, with periodicity of approximately 12-18  nm,
which ensures its high electrical insulation  [2]. Un-
like other cell membranes, where the ratio of lipids
to proteins is approximately 1  :  1, the myelin sheath
S1P – KEY SIGNALING MOLECULE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN MS 659
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
is characterized by a unique biochemical composition:
70-85% consists of lipids and 15-30% of proteins, in-
cluding the myelin basic protein (MBP), proteolipid
protein (PLP), myelin protein zero (MPZ) etc. Relative
water content of the myelin sheath is approximate-
ly 40% of the total mass of myelin in situ [3]. Lipid
composition of myelin ensures stability and compact-
ness of the myelin sheath: cholesterol accounts for ap-
proximately 40-46% of all lipids, phospholipids – for
~40%, and glycolipids – for ~20%  [4]. The most signif-
icant biological role, of all the lipids studied to date,
is attributed to sphingolipids – a specialized class of
bioactive lipids that participate in formation of lipid
rafts – microdomains containing specific protein
components (receptors, ion channels and enzymes).
Sphingolipids are functionally defined as lipid mol-
ecules whose levels change in response to specific
stimuli; these lipids subsequently regulate specific
downstream effector molecules and targets. Thus, bio-
active lipids are components of signaling networks,
which fundamentally distinguishes them from other
lipids that perform primarily structural and/or ener-
gy functions [5, 6]. In recent years, a wealth of evi-
dence has accumulated regarding the involvement of
sphingolipid metabolites in pathogenesis of not only
autoimmune demyelinative diseases but also of neu-
rodegenerative disorders. Of particular interest in this
field is sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) – a biologically
active, multifunctional signaling molecule that plays
a key role in embryonic development, organ morpho-
genesis, maintenance of vascular integrity, regulation
of vascular tone, barrier function of endothelium, and
maintenance of immune homeostasis  [7]. S1P is char-
acterized by a dual signal transduction mechanism
as evidenced by its role in the interaction of neural
signals and metabolic pathways in both normal and
pathological conditions. S1P exerts its effects via two
main pathways: through the extracellular receptors
(S1P-R
1
-S1P-R
5
), which belong to the G-protein-coupled
receptor (GPCR) family, and through the intracellular
targets including regulation of enzymes, transcription
factors, and signaling cascades that influence metab-
olism, autophagy, apoptosis, and mitochondrial func-
tion  [7,  8]. The extracellular pathway mediates neu-
romodulation, regulation of neuroinflammation, cell
migration, and survival, as well as control of nerve
impulse transmission and synaptic plasticity. The in-
tracellular pathway allows S1P to directly influence
cellular metabolic processes, including the balance
between pro-apoptotic ceramide and neuroprotective
S1P, which is critical for maintaining homeostasis and
preventing neurodegeneration  [9].
Pharmacological modulation of S1P signaling has
already proven its efficacy, underscoring relevance of
this topic: a new class of drugs – sphingosine-1-phos-
phate receptor modulators (Fingolimod, Siponimod,
Ozanimod, Ponesimod, Etrasimod, etc.) has been de-
veloped, which are currently used to treat not only
relapsing but also progressive forms of MS  [10,  11].
Understanding of these mechanisms underlies mod-
ern personalized medicine, where S1P signaling path-
ways are becoming targets for predictive diagnostics,
monitoring, and development of new targeted drugs.
The aim of this review is to summarize information
on the structure, metabolic pathways, and physiologi-
cal functions of sphingolipids, in particular S1P, as sig-
naling molecules under normal conditions and in MS.
STRUCTURE OF SPHINGOSINE-1-
PHOSPHATE (S1P) AND SPHINGOLIPID
METABOLIC PATHWAYS
Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a derivative of
sphingosine – an amino alcohol with a long 18-carbon
hydrophobic chain. Structurally sphingosine has one
amino group and two hydroxyl groups. Phosphory-
lation of sphingosine at the primary hydroxyl group
leads to formation of S1P  [12]. Due to the presence
of a hydrophobic “tail” and a polar phosphate “head”
the S1P molecule is able to embed itself in the lipid
bilayer of cell membranes, while simultaneously act-
ing as an extracellular signaling molecule. In particu-
lar, S1P is known as an important second messenger
that influences cell migration, angiogenesis, cell sur-
vival, and immune responses. A schematic molecular
framework of sphingolipids is shown in Fig.  1.
Detailed structures of known sphingolipids are
presented in Table  1.
Table  1. Composition of the R1- and R2-groups of
sphingolipids
Sphingolipids R1-group R2-group
Sphingosine-1-
phosphate
-PO
3
H- -H
2
+
Sphingosine -H -H
2
+
Ceramide -H fatty
acid
Sphingomyelin -PC/PE/PS fatty
acid
Cerebroside monosaccharide fatty
acid
Ganglioside oligosaccharide +
sialic acid
fatty
acid
Note. PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanol-
amine; PS, phosphatidylserine.
GANIN, ZAKHAROVA660
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
Fig. 1. Molecular backbone of sphingolipids: O-linked to a polar head group (R1) and amide-linked (–NH–) to a fatty acid (R2).
Biosynthesis of sphingolipids in the cell begins
with formation of ceramide  – a key intermediate in
sphingolipid metabolism. De  novo synthesis occurs
in endoplasmic reticulum: condensation of L-serine
with palmitoyl-CoA (catalyzed by the enzyme serine
palmitoyltransferase in the presence of pyridoxal
phosphate, NADPH and Mn
2+
) leads to formation of
3-keto-dihydrosphingosine, which is next reduced to
dihydrosphingosine (sphinganine). Acylation of sphin-
ganine is catalyzed by the dihydroceramide synthase
to form dihydroceramide, while desaturation of dihy-
droceramide to ceramide is carried out by the dihy-
droceramide desaturase forming a double bond in the
sphingosine backbone  [13]. Ceramide is exported to
the Golgi apparatus with involvement of the ceramide
transporter protein (CERT)  [14], where the synthesis
of complex sphingolipids subsequently takes place –
sphingomyelins (with involvement of sphingomyelin
synthase) or glycosphingolipids (via reaction cata-
lyzed by glucosylceramide synthase). These complex
sphingolipids are further transported to the cell plas-
ma membrane, becoming part of its structure. In the
cell membrane, sphingolipids in combination with
cholesterol form specialized microdomains – lipid
rafts containing specific protein components (recep-
tors, ion channels and enzymes)  [12,  15].
Lipid–protein raft complexes play a role in facil-
itating membrane transport, signal transduction, and
formation of synaptic vesicles in presynaptic nerve
terminals [16]. In addition to the de  novo pathway,
an important source of S1P is a biochemical cas-
cade beginning with degradation of the membrane
sphingolipids: under the action of sphingomyelin-
ase sphingomyelin is hydrolyzed to ceramide and
phosphocholine. Ceramide could be further cleaved
by ceramidases forming sphingosine. The resulting
sphingosine is phosphorylated by the sphingosine ki-
nase (there are two isoenzymes: SphK1 and SphK2) to
form sphingosine-1-phosphate  [17]. This “sphingomye-
linase” pathway is activated in response to stress and
is thought to be involved in regulation of apoptosis
and other responses to damage.
Overall, the sphingolipid metabolic pathway can
be visualized as a “dimmer switch” between ceramide
and S1P. Ceramide and its associated metabolites typ-
ically initiate stress and pro-apoptotic responses (cell
cycle arrest, apoptosis), whereas S1P predominantly
triggers anti-apoptotic cascades and cell proliferation.
This balance has been termed the “sphingolipid rheo-
stat”  [2,  3] or the “rheostat of life and death”. Under
normal conditions, the “S1P-ceramide” ratio is strict-
ly regulated. However, in autoimmune demyelinative
diseases, particularly multiple sclerosis, disruption of
this balance is observed – involving a shift towards
ceramide accumulation and reduction in S1P levels,
which contributes to the predominance of cellular
processes of apoptosis and inflammation  [18]. The
available data on sphingolipid metabolism are pre-
sented in Fig. 2.
S1P is eliminated via both irreversible and re-
versible pathways. The S1P produced within the cell
could be metabolized via three main pathways: deg-
radation into metabolites (irreversible pathway), de-
phosphorylation back to sphingosine (reversible path-
way), or export into the extracellular space. The key
enzyme in S1P catabolism is sphingosine-1-phosphate
lyase (SPL), which irreversibly cleaves S1P into eth-
anolamine phosphate and palmitoyl aldehyde. This
reaction effectively removes sphingolipid from the
metabolic cycle and maintains low levels of S1P in
the tissues. Alternatively, S1P could be dephosphor-
ylated by the specific S1P phosphatases with revers-
ible formation of sphingosine. In the plasma mem-
brane and extracellular space S1P phosphatases (e.g.
LPP3) inactivate S1P, thereby helping to maintain the
sphingosine-1-phosphate concentration gradient. S1P
is exported via specific ABC transporters or trans-
porters of the major facilitator superfamily, which
“flip” the S1P molecule from the inner to the outer
leaflet of the plasma membrane, thereby enabling its
extracellular action in an autocrine manner (within
the same cell). The tissue-specific transporters such
as the SPNS2 (sphingolipid transporter-2) protein of
vascular endothelial cells and lymphatic endothelial
cells and MFSD2B (major facilitator superfamily do-
main-containing protein 2B) in erythrocytes facilitate
export of S1P resulting in formation of extracellular
gradients  [7,  13].
Under normal conditions, the main cellular
sources of S1P circulating in the blood are red blood
cells and vascular endothelial cells, whereas S1P in
the lymphatic fluid is produced by the lymphatic en-
dothelial cells  [19]. During inflammation excessive
S1P production is driven by activation of mast cells
S1P – KEY SIGNALING MOLECULE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN MS 661
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
Fig. 2. Sphingolipid metabolic pathway.
and platelets  [20]. Since internal organs actively syn-
thesize and release S1P, and it is rapidly eliminated
in peripheral tissues, a marked S1P concentration
gradient is established within the body. In blood and
lymph, the S1P levels are high (S1P is constantly re-
leased from erythrocytes via the MFSD2B transport-
er and from vascular endothelium – via the SPNS2
transporter, and is also released by platelets). In con-
trast, the S1P concentration in interstitial fluid is very
low due to active degradation by the enzymes (SPL,
S1P phosphatases)  [7,  13]. The extracellular S1P gra-
dient (high concentration in the systemic circulation
and low in the tissues) has fundamental physiologi-
cal significance: it serves as a key signal for the exit
of immune cells from lymphoid organs. This process
limits the concentration of S1P both inside and out-
side the cell, thereby indirectly regulating subsequent
signaling pathways. A generalized representation
of the process of S1P gradient formation is shown
in Fig.  3.
A number of studies have shown that the im-
paired function of S1P transporters leads not only to
the developmental defects but also to the early-onset
hearing loss  [21] as well as to retinal damage  [22].
These observations suggest that the spatial S1P signal-
ing, which is critical for embryogenesis and postnatal
physiological processes, leads to the development of
pathological conditions when dysregulated. Cellular
mechanisms by which activity of the S1P transport-
ers is regulated remain poorly understood at present.
Approaches aimed at restoring normal transporter
function may prove promising in the treatment of
various diseases in which extracellular S1P gradients
are disrupted.
Further activation of the S1P-receptor (S1P-R)
occurs through binding to the chaperone proteins,
which ensures its solubility in an aqueous environ-
ment [7, 23]. The S1P chaperone proteins, which bind
S1P tightly and transport it in the blood and intersti-
tial fluids, facilitate activation of the S1P receptors on
the target cells. S1P is transported in the bloodstream
by the chaperone proteins: a component of high-den-
sity lipoproteins (HDL) – apolipoprotein  M (ApoM)
and serum albumin; S1P is presented to S1P-Rs in
this form. Most of the S1P molecules in blood are
bound to ApoM-HDL, which performs several func-
tions: it maintains stable S1P level in the blood plas-
ma for several hours  [24] preventing its degradation
and enhances its interaction with receptors. In con-
trast, the S1P molecules bound to albumin have a
short half-life in plasma (a few minutes) and activate
the S1P-Rs differently from the ApoM-HDL-bound S1P
as they have lower affinity  [25]. The S1P molecules
bound to ApoM-HDL in haematopoietic stem cells
suppress lymphopoiesis via the S1P-S1P-R
1
signaling
pathway  [26]. Furthermore, the ApoM-bound S1P sup-
presses the cytokine-induced inflammatory responses
in endothelial cells, thereby maintaining vascular in-
tegrity  [27]. It possesses biased agonist activity, i.e.,
it selectively induces specific biological responses.
GANIN, ZAKHAROVA662
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
Fig.  3. Formation of the S1P gradient. VEC, vascular endothelial cells. LEC, lymphatic endothelial cells. HDL (ApoM), high-den-
sity lipoprotein-associated apolipoprotein M.
Other HDL-associated factors such as apolipoprotein
A1 and cellular HDL receptor (scavenger receptor-B1),
as well as ability of HDL to modulate organization of
the receptor-effector complexes in the lipid rafts are
likely also involved in formation of the biased signal-
ing [28,  29]. Furthermore, relative stability of the S1P
bound to ApoM-HDL compared with the S1P bound to
serum albumin may play a role in the different kinet-
ics of receptor activation and signal transduction [30].
S1P-RECEPTORS: STRUCTURE, FUNCTIONS,
AND INTRACELLULAR SIGNALLING PATHWAYS
To date, five subtypes of S1P-receptors have been
identified: S1P-R
1
, S1P-R
2
, S1P-R
3
, S1P-R
4
, and S1P-R
5
.
All belong to the superfamily of G-protein-coupled
receptors that are embedded in the cell membrane
and share a similar structure – a seven-transmem-
brane domain linked to a G-protein on the cytoplas-
mic side  [31].
Activation of the S1P-receptors by circulating S1P
bound to the chaperone proteins is accompanied by
the reduction in their surface expression on the cell
surface  [32] with the result that the vascular and
haematopoietic cells, which are under constant ex-
posure to circulating S1P, become refractory to fur-
ther stimulation. The S1P-R
1
endocytosis is controlled
by the G-protein-coupled receptor kinase  2 (GRK2),
dynamin, and moesin  [33]. Loss of these regulatory
mechanisms of S1P-R
1
leads to alterations in biolog-
ical effects including impaired immune cell migra-
tion and dysfunction of the vascular endothelial bar-
rier  [34,  35].
Development of the S1P-R
1
reporter mouse lines
revealed existence of the plasma S1P-dependent ac-
tivation of β-arrestin in the vascular endothelium
during systemic endotoxemia as well as in the aortic
endothelium in the areas of impaired blood flow  [36].
The results of these studies indicate that the S1P-R
1
expression is downregulated in the damaged endothe-
lial cells. Internalization of S1P-R
1
ultimately leads to
its proteasomal degradation via the ubiquitin ligase
enzyme WWP2 (WW Domain Containing E3 Ubiquitin
Protein Ligase  2)  [37]. The ability to monitor the S1P
receptor function in  vivo in real time is expected to
lead to new insights into the physiological regulation
of S1P signaling and its dysregulation in various dis-
eases [7,  36]. Activity of the S1P receptors in addition
to their primary ligand – sphingosine-1-phosphate – is
also modulated by other molecules as well as co-recep-
tors: for example, in the development of cholestasis,
the elevated levels of conjugated bile acids activate
S1P-R
2
, which may play a role in the pathogenesis of
liver fibrosis in cholestasis  [38]. In endothelial cells,
the activated protein C receptor and the hyaluron-
ic acid receptor CD44 transactivate S1P-R
1
enhancing
the barrier function, thereby preventing plasma leak-
age and limiting inflammatory responses  [39].
In lymphocytes, the activation-induced CD69
binds to S1P-R
1
and reduces its expression  [40],
which is critical for regulating exit of lymphocytes
from the lymphoid organs and their tissue residency.
In the CNS, binding of the extracellular domain of
NOGOA (a neuronal repulsive signaling molecule reg-
ulating formation of neural networks) to S1P-R
2
in-
duces signaling via the GPCR-dependent Gα13–RhoA
pathway inhibiting neurite growth, thereby ensuring
S1P – KEY SIGNALING MOLECULE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN MS 663
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
Table  2. Expression and functional roles of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors (S1P-R
1
-S1P-R
5
) in different
tissues
Receptor Tissue expression pattern Key physiological functions
S1P-R
1
basically, all tissues in the body; vascular
endothelium, smooth muscle cells,
T andB lymphocytes, neurons, astrocytes,
oligodendrocytes
maintenance of vascular integrity (Akt/eNOS
pathway), regulation of blood-brain barrier
permeability, control of lymphocyte efflux
from lymph nodes, involvement in neurogenesis
and neuronal survival
S1P-R
2
vascular endothelium, smooth muscle cells,
neurons, microglia, monocytes, specific
populations of lymphocytes
activation of the Rho/ROCK cascade, stabilization
of intercellular junctions, inhibition of cell
migration, reduced neuronal excitability
S1P-R
3
heart, blood vessels, astrocytes, microglia vasoconstriction, regulation of heart rate,
activation of Rho and intracellular Ca
2+
,
stimulation of astrogliosis and cytokine
production
S1P-R
4
thymus, spleen, lymph nodes, lungs, bone
marrow, cells of the immune system (NK-cells,
T- and B-lymphocytes)
regulation of immune cell migration and
differentiation, control of the cytokine response,
involvement in innate immunity
S1P-R
5
spleen, oligodendrocytes and oligodendrocyte
precursor cells, hippocampal neurons, astrocytes,
NK-cells
maintaining survival and differentiation
of oligodendrocytes, regulation of myelination,
contributing to the barrier function
of endothelium
synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus and motor
cortex  [41]. The examples cited above demonstrate
that the S1P-receptors interact with a multitude of
other signaling pathways. Mechanistic details of the
S1P transfer from the chaperone proteins to S1P-re-
ceptors, actions of the various receptor-modulating
molecules, and roles of the regulated endocytosis and
retention of S1P receptors in the plasma membrane
require further investigation.
As noted above, the S1P-receptors belong to the
superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors. Differenc-
es in amino acid sequence result in varying specific-
ity of binding to Gα-subunits and, consequently, acti-
vation of different intracellular signaling pathways.
S1P-R
1
highly selectively activates the G
i
/
o
protein.
Upon binding of S1P to S1P-R
1
, GTP is exchanged for
GDP in G
i
, and the released subunits initiate classical
pathways: inhibition of adenylate cyclase (decrease
in cAMP levels) as well as activation of phosphatidy-
linositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and the MAP-kinase cascade
(via Ras/ERK)  [8]. These signals lead to the different
effects in different cells: in neurons – to anti-apop-
totic cascades and growth; in endothelial cells – to
activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS)
and enhancement of the barrier function, and in
lymphocytes – to changes in the receptor expression
necessary for migration  [42]. S1P-R
2
is capable of in-
teracting with three types of G-proteins simultane-
ously: G
i
/
o
, G
q
, and G
12
/
13
. Its interaction with G
12
/
13
is particularly important: activation of S1P-R
2
leads
to activation of the small G-protein RhoA and its ef-
fector ROCK, which triggers cytoskeletal reorganiza-
tion – formation of stress fibers, contraction of the
cell’s actin-myosin cytoskeleton, and changes in the
cell shape. Simultaneously, via G
q
, S1P-R
2
can acti-
vate phospholipase C and increase cytoplasmic Ca
2+
levels [43]. S1P-R
3
is similar to S1P-R
2
in that it is
also capable of binding to G
i
, G
q
, and G
12
/
13
. Activa-
tion of S1P-R
3
typically causes release of Ca
2+
(via
the PLC/IP
3
pathway) and activation of the Rho sig-
naling and could also influence the MAPK signaling
pathway [44]. S1P-R
4
usually binds to G
i
and G
12
/
13
.
It is less well studied, but it is known that its acti-
vation influences migration of immune system cells
and certain processes of nervous system development
(presumably via Rho activation and interaction with
the transcription factor NF-κB) [45]. S1P-R
5
interacts
with G
i
and G
12
/
12
. Via G
i
it can activate the PI3K/Akt
signaling, and via G
12
/
12
/
13
– Rho/ROCK; overall S1P-R
5
in different cell types either inhibits migration (e.g.,
of oligodendrocytes – via Rho-activation) or promotes
survival (via Akt-activation)  [8].
S1P-receptors form a complex network of signal-
ing pathways. Their distribution across the organs
and cells largely determines outcome of the biolog-
ical effect of S1P. Each of the five receptors has a
characteristic pattern of expression in the tissues,
as shown in Table  2. Pharmacological modulation of
GANIN, ZAKHAROVA664
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
these receptors allows for selective influence on the
immune system and CNS, which forms the basis of
modern treatments for multiple sclerosis.
PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF S1P
IN CNS AS A SIGNALLING MOLECULE
All S1P-receptors with exception of S1P-R
4
are
expressed in CNS by neurons and glial cells. S1P
signaling is essential for normal functioning of neu-
rogenesis and neuronal differentiation: activation of
the S1P-receptors stimulates proliferation of neuro-
nal precursors and enhances neuronal survival via
activation of the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling
pathways  [46]. Furthermore, S1P regulates synaptic
activity and neurotransmission such as activation of
the S1P-R
1
on neurons increases plasma membrane
excitability and neurotransmitter release, which con-
tributes to the effective synaptic transmission  [47].
S1P-R
2
, conversely, controls neuronal excitability, and
in the experimental studies deletion of the S1P-R
2
gene in mice led to neuronal hyperexcitability  [48].
S1P also plays a significant role in the process-
es of myelination and remyelination. Oligodendro-
cytes – the cells that form the myelin sheath – ex-
press several subtypes of S1P-receptors with S1P-R
5
being predominant in the mature oligodendrocytes.
The signaling pathway via S1P-R
5
promotes survival
of these cells by activating anti-apoptotic pathways
(e.g., PI3K/Akt), at the same time it could potentially
limit their migration via the Rho/ROCK pathway  [46].
S1P-R
1
, on the contrary, stimulates migration and
growth of oligodendrocytes involved in myelin forma-
tion. Simultaneous activation of S1P-R
1
and S1P-R
5
is
important for proper myelination: it has been shown
that the absence of S1P-R
1
in the experimental an-
imals leads to reduction in the myelin protein lev-
els and thinning of the myelin sheaths of axons  [49].
In the experimental models of demyelination (e.g.,
the cuprizone toxin model) stimulation of S1P-R
1
promotes remyelination; in particular, it was shown
that activation of this receptor type reduced oligoden-
drocyte apoptosis, prevented myelin loss, and accel-
erated its regeneration [50]. Furthermore, treatment
of the oligodendrocyte precursor cells with low doses
of S1P or fingolimod (an S1P analogue) in  vitro en-
hanced their differentiation into mature oligodendro-
cytes  [51]. These data suggest that the S1P signaling
could promote endogenous reparative processes in
the CNS (remyelination), which is particularly rele-
vant for the chronic stages of MS, when regenerative
potential of oligodendrocytes is virtually exhausted.
S1P also regulates a number of key functions in
astroglial cells. Astrocytes express S1P-R
1
and S1P-R
3
,
and upon exposure to certain growth factors they also
begin to express S1P-R
5
. The S1P signaling pathways
in astrocytes control their proliferation (via activation
of the ERK kinase cascade), migration, formation of
the intercellular contacts (e.g., gap junction commu-
nication), and secretion of growth factors  [52]. S1P is
also involved in the development of astrogliosis – re-
active proliferation of astrocytes during inflammation
or injury. It has been shown that under conditions of
pro-inflammatory stimulation, astrocytes upregulate
expression of the S1P-R
1
and S1P-R
3
receptors, and
activation of these receptors contributes to astroglio-
sis. In the astrocyte cultures, activation of S1P-R
3
by
selective agonists increased the level of expression
of pro-inflammatory molecules – cyclooxygenase-2,
interleukin-6, and vascular endothelial growth fac-
tor (VEGF) [53]. On the other hand, blocking the S1P
signaling in astrocytes could limit pathological pro-
cesses: for example, use of the functional S1P-R
1
an-
tagonist (the drug FTY720 – Fingolimod) suppressed
release of neurotoxic mediators from astrocytes  [54],
and thereby attenuated neurodegenerative chang-
es mediated by astrocytes and microglia. Inhibiting
S1P-R
1
in astrocytes in the experiments also reduced
neuropathic pain by enhancing secretion of the an-
ti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10  [55].
Microglia, which are resident innate immune
cells of the CNS, are also sensitive to S1P. Under phys-
iological conditions microglial cells predominantly ex-
press the S1P-R
1
and S1P-R
3
subtypes and remain in
a resting state. S1P functions as a chemotactic factor
for microglia: extracellular S1P is capable of induc-
ing directed migration of microglial cells towards the
site of injury. In the areas of acute brain tissue dam-
age, increase in the S1P concentration is observed,
which correlates with accumulation of microglia in
these regions  [56]. As microglial cells are activated,
there is a significant reorganization of the S1P-recep-
tor expression profile: surface expression of S1P-R
1
and S1P-R
3
decreases, while expression of S1P-R
2
in-
creases significantly. It is believed that activation of
S1P-R
2
contributes to the enhancement of pro-inflam-
matory responses in microglia through stimulation
of the Rho/ROCK signaling pathway and subsequent
reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton  [57]. Modula-
tion of the S1P signaling has a marked effect on the
functional state of microglia under conditions of neu-
roinflammation. In the model of experimental auto-
immune encephalomyelitis (EAE) the use of function-
al modulators/antagonists of S1P-R
1
and S1P-R
5
led to
the significant reduction in local neuroinflammation
caused by both microglial activation and infiltration
of the autoreactive T-cells. This was accompanied by
the improvement in the clinical course of the disease
in animals  [10]. The obtained data suggest that the
drugs that modulate the S1P- receptor signaling could
have a dual therapeutic effect: immunosuppressive
S1P – KEY SIGNALING MOLECULE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN MS 665
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
(through their effect on circulating lymphocytes) and
direct neuroprotective (by regulating functional ac-
tivity of the resident glial cells, primarily microglia).
Thus the “S1P-S1P-receptors” signaling system
represents a promising target for the development of
new treatment strategies for demyelinative diseases,
primarily multiple sclerosis, where combination of
the immunomodulatory and neuroprotective effects
could significantly improve prognosis and slow the
disease progression. Further research aimed at the
selective modulation of specific subtypes of S1P-re-
ceptors in various compartments of the CNS appears
necessary for the development of more effective and
safer therapeutic approaches.
METABOLIC EFFECTS OF S1P AND CERAMIDE
In addition to their roles as extracellular ligands
and intracellular signaling mediators, S1P and cera-
mide are involved in key metabolic processes in the
brain, influencing autophagy, mitochondrial function,
oxidative stress and apoptosis. Key enzymes in sphin-
golipid metabolism include sphingosine kinase-1 and
sphingosine kinase-2: “cytosolic” sphingosine kinase-1
(SphK1) is the most extensively studied enzyme in
the S1P metabolism. Basal SphK1 activity maintains
cellular balance of sphingosine and S1P; and upon
exposure of the cell to a range of agonists includ-
ing pro-inflammatory cytokines and various growth
factors, SphK-1 is activated via the ERK1/2-mediated
phosphorylation and its translocation to the plasma
membrane [58]. S1P produced by SphK1 exhibits an-
ti-apoptotic properties, promotes cell proliferation,
survival, and migration by stimulating AMPK, reduc-
ing oxidative stress, and modulating mitochondrial
function, as well as participating in neurogenesis
and synaptic plasticity  [59]. In MS, the increased ex-
pression of SphK1 in microglia and astrocytes exac-
erbates neuroinflammation via the NF-κB activation
and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β,
TNF-α) contributing to oligodendrocyte apoptosis and
demyelination. The SphK1-inhibitors demonstrate a
neuroprotective effect in the experimental models of
MS reducing inflammation, stimulating remyelination,
and slowing the disease progression  [60]. “Nuclear
SphK2 is localized in the intracellular membrane
structures and is not secreted into the extracellular
space. SphK2 is found primarily in the cell nucleus;
and it inhibits the histone deacetylases HDAC1 and
HDAC2; thus, this enzyme mediates indirect influ-
ence of the sphingolipid metabolism on the regula-
tion of gene expression governing lipid and carbo-
hydrate metabolism as well as genes associated with
epigenetic regulation and response to DNA dam-
age  [58,  61].
In mitochondria, S1P modulates assembly and
function of the complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase) of
the respiratory chain and interacts with the protein
prohibitin-2, thereby ensuring efficient electron trans-
port and maintenance of cellular respiration thus
preventing an energy deficit  [62]. Systemically S1P
integrates with the pathways of steroidogenesis and
phospholipid metabolism influencing lipid metabo-
lism and maintaining energy balance in the tissues
with high metabolic activity including brain  [63].
In contrast, the “ceramide pathway” is often asso-
ciated with metabolic disorders. Accumulation of cera-
mides (e.g., C16:0) in the brain leads to mitochondrial
dysfunction, activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome,
and increased levels of IL-1β, which exacerbates neu-
roinflammation and neurodegeneration [64]. In the MS
pathogenesis, a metabolic shift towards predominance
of ceramides over S1P is observed: the elevated levels
of ceramides in plasma and brain tissues correlate
with the oligodendrocyte apoptosis, demyelination,
and disease progression. This disruption of the “sphin-
golipid rheostat” causes metabolic stress, including ac-
cumulation of the ceramide-enriched exosomes that
exert a toxic effect on the neighboring cells.
Thus, metabolic effects of S1P and ceramides
are closely intertwined with the signaling pathways
forming bidirectional links: metabolic shifts (e.g.,
activation of ceramidases or sphingosine-kinases,
which influence the levels of bioactive metabolites
of sphingolipid metabolism) affect signal transduc-
tion in the CNS, while signaling via the S1P-receptors
modulates metabolism. These interactions highlight
the role of the “sphingolipid rheostat” as an integra-
tor of metabolism and neuronal function in the CNS,
where imbalances lead to a cascade of pathological
events at the cellular and molecular levels (apopto-
sis, autophagy, mitochondrial dysfunction) through
to systemic manifestations (demyelination, neurode-
generation, remyelination). This not only deepens our
understanding of the MS pathogenesis, but also opens
up prospects for comprehensive therapy aimed at re-
storing metabolic balance.
S1P-DEPENDENT REGULATION
OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE
Function, localization, and survival of the im-
mune system cells are largely determined by regula-
tion of the S1P signaling and S1P-receptors. Migration
and localization of the innate immune cells in the
sites of inflammation, exit of B- and T-lymphocytes
from the bone marrow and thymus, as well as their
recirculation through the secondary lymphoid organs
(including directed movement towards marginal zones
and subsequent entry into the systemic circulation)
GANIN, ZAKHAROVA666
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
depend to a large extent on the surface expression
of S1P-receptors (primarily S1P-R
1
) and formation of
the S1P concentration gradients between the differ-
ent tissue compartments. It has been experimentally
demonstrated that when the S1P levels in the blood
or lymph are reduced (e.g., pharmacologically) lym-
phocytes cease to leave the lymph nodes remaining
“trapped inside” – this leads to the rapid reversible
lymphopenic effect  [65]. Thus, maintenance of the
S1P-gradient and functional activity of S1P-R
1
on the
surface of lymphocytes is critical for normal immune
surveillance. Disruption of this gradient effectively
suppresses immune responses by preventing lympho-
cytes from leaving the organs of the lymphoid system.
S1P mediates migration of not only naive but also ac-
tivated lymphocytes. For example, upon initiation of
an immune response in a lymph node, the activated
T-lymphocytes, after some time, increase the level of
expression of S1P-R
1,
which lets them to “leave” the
lymph node and “reach” the site of inflammation; this
process underlies organotropism of inflammation. In
autoimmune diseases, particularly MS, the autoaggres-
sive effector cells also utilize the S1P signaling path-
way for recirculation and penetration into the CNS.
In fact, exit of the autoreactive lymphocytes from
lymph nodes and their migration to the target tissues
constitute an S1P-dependent stage in the pathogen-
esis of autoimmunity. Pharmacological modulation
of this mechanism underlies the action of the entire
class of immunomodulators– functional S1P-R
1
-antag-
onists. Drugs of this group (Fingolimod, Siponimod,
Ozanimod and others) bind to S1P-R
1
on the surface of
lymphocytes causing internalization and degradation
of the receptor; due to this the cells temporarily lose
their ability to “sense” the S1P-gradient and “leave”
the lymphoid organs. This results in “retention” of a
significant proportion of T- and B-lymphocytes in the
lymph nodes, causing reduced lymphocytic infiltra-
tion of the target organs, and, consequently, reduction
in the immunopathological tissue damage.
In addition to lymphocytes, S1P influences func-
tion of many other immune cells. For example, mono-
cytes and neutrophils express various S1P-receptors
through which S1P can regulate their chemotaxis and
cytokine secretion. The S1P-gradient acts as a chemo-
tactic factor for monocytes at the sites of inflamma-
tion in a similar way to how it “attracts” microglia to
the sites of damage in the CNS  [66]. S1P can modulate
maturation of dendritic cells and migration of these
antigen-presenting cells to lymph nodes. Further-
more, S1P influences B-lymphocytes: their exit from
the spleen and lymph nodes is also regulated via
S1P-R
1
, and function of B-cells in the peripheral cir-
culation (e.g., antibody production) could depend on
the S1P levels in the microenvironment. The S1P-re-
ceptor modulators used in MS reduce the number of
both T- and B-lymphocytes circulating in the systemic
circulation, which leads to a weakening of both the
T-cell and humoral components of the autoimmune
process. In  MS, B-cells contribute to pathogenesis
through antigen presentation, secretion of pro-inflam-
matory cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6), and synthesis of
antibodies against myelin; consequently their “reten-
tion” via the S1P-receptor modulators also contributes
to clinical improvement [67].
Inhibition of lymphocyte migration can be
achieved not only through the direct modulation
of S1P-receptors, but also by targeting enzymes in-
volved in the S1P metabolism, in particular by inhib-
iting sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase (SPL). Inhibition
of SPL leads to accumulation of S1P predominantly
in the lymphoid tissues (including lymph nodes and
the spleen), which enhances signaling via S1P-R
1
on
the surface of lymphocytes. Paradoxically, this causes
functional desensitization and internal degradation
of S1P-R
1
preventing lymphocytes from leaving lym-
phoid organs and inducing marked lymphopenia in
the peripheral blood.
Recent preclinical studies have demonstrated
that the selective inhibitors of SPL cause significant
increase in the S1P levels in lymphoid tissues accom-
panied by the marked lymphopenia and reduction
in clinical manifestations of EAE in the animals  [68].
This approach is considered an alternative immuno-
suppression strategy for autoimmune diseases, po-
tentially offering greater selectivity compared to the
S1P receptor modulators. It is hypothesized that the
SPL-inhibitors predominantly increase S1P concentra-
tions in the lymphoid compartments and only slightly
affect its levels in the CNS, which may reduce the
risk of side effects associated with the direct effects
on the resident CNS cells.
Furthermore, S1P plays a role in regulating the
innate immune system, in particular by influencing
the natural killer (NK) cells and invariant NKT (iNKT)
cells– a specialized population of T-lymphocytes that
recognize lipid antigens in the context of CD1d mol-
ecules  [69]. The iNKT cells are capable of producing
both pro-inflammatory (IFN-γ, IL-17) and anti-inflam-
matory (IL-4, IL-10, IL-13) cytokines, thereby modulat-
ing the balance of immune response in autoimmune
diseases  [70]. In MS, functional inactivity (anergy)
of the iNKT cells in response to endogenous sphin-
golipids is observed, which contributes to dysregula-
tion of the immune response  [71]. Experimental ap-
proaches have been suggested that aim to restore the
immunoregulatory function of iNKT cells by admin-
istering synthetic analogues of α-galactosylceramide
(α-GalCer) – a classic lipid antigen for CD1d. Such
analogues are capable of “reprogramming” iNKT-
cells towards predominant production of anti-in-
flammatory cytokines, which leads to suppression of
S1P – KEY SIGNALING MOLECULE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN MS 667
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
autoimmune damage to myelin in the EAE models  [72].
Although this mechanism is not directly associated
with the S1P signaling, it highlights central role of
the sphingolipid pathways in the fine-tuning of the
immune response and opens up the prospects for the
development of the new lipid-mediated immunomod-
ulatory strategies for autoimmune diseases includ-
ing MS. Further research is needed to assess safety,
selectivity, and clinical translational value of these
approaches.
S1P AND BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER
Blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a multi-layered dy-
namic system formed by the endothelial cells of the
brain’s capillaries, which are closely connected by
tight junctions as well as by pericytes and astrocyte
processes. It acts as a filter controlling passage of
the cells and soluble molecules from the blood into
the CNS. In MS, an early event is disruption of the
integrity of BBB, which facilitates penetration of
immune cells to the CNS. S1P signaling is involved
in the regulation of BBB permeability and can both
protect the barrier and, in some cases, contribute to
its damage. Under normal physiological conditions,
S1P helps maintain tight junctions between the en-
dothelial cells, thereby strengthening the BBB. S1P-R
1
is highly expressed on the endothelial cells of the
CNS microvasculature. The S1P-S1P-R
1
signal in the
endothelium via activation of Akt/eNOS and a num-
ber of other pathways stimulate assembly of the tight
junction proteins – occludin and claudins – which re-
duces intercellular (paracellular) permeability of the
vascular wall  [73]. The S1P-S1P-R
1
signaling pathway
also counteracts lymphocyte migration through the
endothelial cells themselves (i.e. transcellular per-
meability of the vascular wall), thereby maintaining
the anti-inflammatory phenotype of the endothelium.
Experiments have shown that when this metabolic
signal is blocked, endothelial cells shift to the pro-in-
flammatory state, and connections between the cells
weaken – the endothelium becomes more “loose” and
permeable to the immune cells. Thus, the endogenous
S1P performs a protective function of the BBB.
However, under conditions of inflammation and
pathology, interactions between S1P and the BBB are
more complex. It has been observed that in neuroin-
flammation the action of S1P-receptors could have
a dual effect: on the one hand, activation of S1P-R
1
in the endothelium could increase the barriers im-
permeability reducing lymphocyte diapedesis (for
example, Fingolimod helps to stabilize intercellular
contacts in the endothelium, thereby reducing pen-
etration of the cells into the CNS) [74]. On the other
hand, some data suggest that under pathological
conditions the increased activation of other subtypes
of S1P-receptors could disrupt integrity of the BBB.
In particular, the S1P-R
2
expressed on the endothe-
lium is capable of inducing cytoskeletal remodeling
and formation of stress fibers upon excessive acti-
vation leading to the opening of intercellular gaps
and increased vascular permeability  [75]. In the EAE
model, it was shown that the S1P-R
2
expression in-
creases sharply in the cerebral vessels during the
acute phase, and the use of S1P-R
2
antagonists re-
duced the disease severity  [76]. Thus, balance of the
signals from different S1P-receptors could determine
the state of BBB during inflammation: predominance
of the S1P-R
1
signals strengthens the barrier, while
predominance of the S1P-R
2
signals weakens it. Astro-
cytes play a distinct role: they are a key component
of the neurovascular unit and together with the en-
dothelium form the BBB. The processes of astrocytes
surround the capillaries of the brain and release fac-
tors that influence permeability of the barrier. Astro-
cytes themselves are sensitive to S1P: their surface
bears S1P-R
1
and S1P-R
3
activation of which could
alter expression of the proteins important for the
endothelial-astrocytic contacts. It has been shown in
the cell culture experiments that upon inflammatory
activation of astrocytes S1P is capable of enhancing
expression of the matrix metalloproteinases, which
degrade the vascular basement membrane as well
as suppress production of angiopoietin-1 – a key fac-
tor supporting barrier function – by astrocytes  [53].
This could lead to disruption of the integrity of BBB.
On the other hand, Fingolimod, which also acts on
astrocytes, is capable of indirectly protecting the BBB:
it has been noted that its use reduces production of
the pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines by
astrocytes, attenuates reactive astrocytosis, and de-
creases recruitment of leukocytes to the vascular wall.
During the relapse of MS, an increase in per-
meability of the BBB has been observed, which
correlates with the appearance of areas of contrast
enhancement on the MRI scans. The studies with hu-
man endothelial cell cultures have confirmed that
Fingolimod strengthens intercellular contacts by in-
creasing cadherin levels in the endothelial adhe-
sion junctions [77]. Thus, targeting S1P-R
1
represents
a promising strategy for preserving BBB integrity
during neuroinflammation. Hence, S1P plays a “dual”
role in the regulation of BBB: under normal condi-
tions it is essential for maintaining barrier function,
but during inflammation an imbalance in activation
of the S1P-receptors could contribute to the impaired
barrier permeability. Therapeutic modulation of the
S1P signal (aimed at enhancing S1P-R
1
and blocking
S1P-R
2
) is considered as an approach to preserve
integrity of BBB and prevent penetration of autore-
active immune cells into the CNS.
GANIN, ZAKHAROVA668
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
ROLE OF S1P IN PATHOGENESIS
OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
Multiple sclerosis is a disease with complex
pathogenesis involving activation of autoimmune re-
actions against myelin components and subsequent
progressive axonal damage. It is believed that the
onset of the disease is associated with appearance of
T-lymphocytes in the peripheral immune system that
recognize myelin antigens. In the healthy individuals
the autoaggressive lymphocytes are usually eliminat-
ed or kept in an inactive state (central and peripheral
tolerance). However, in the presence of genetic pre-
disposition and under the influence of external fac-
tors (infections, vitamin D, smoking, etc.), a pool of
autoaggressive T-cells targeting myelin proteins could
form. Such antigens include the main components of
the myelin sheath: MBP, PLP, and others.
Indeed, in the patients with MS, the CD4
+
and
CD8
+
T-lymphocytes specific to MBP and PLP epi-
topes and producing pro-inflammatory cytokines
(IL-2, IFN-γ, TNF-α) are detected in peripheral blood
[78]. It is believed that activation of such autoaggres-
sive lymphocytes in the periphery is the first stage
of the pathological cascade. The activated CD4
+
Th1
and Th17 cells as well as cytotoxic CD8
+
T-cells and
autoreactive B-cells undergo clonal expansion and
begin to express adhesion molecules and chemokine
receptors, enabling them to migrate into the CNS  [79].
As noted earlier, S1P via S1P-R
1
facilitates exit of the
autoreactive lymphocytes from the lymphoid organs
into the peripheral bloodstream. Without the S1P sig-
nal, the autoaggressive T- and B-cells would remain
“trapped” in the lymph nodes and spleen and would
be unable to penetrate the CNS. Consequently S1P-R
1
acts as a catalyst for the autoimmune process – an
elevated or normally functioning S1P signal facilitates
onset of an autoimmune attack. This is confirmed by
the fact that the S1P-R
1
blockade significantly attenu-
ates the course of EAE in animals preventing penetra-
tion of the aggressive lymphocytes into the CNS [80].
The next stage in the pathogenesis involves lympho-
cytes crossing the BBB and penetrating the CNS. The
T-cells expressing integrins [e.g., very late antigen-4
(α4β1 integrin) – VLA-4] attach to the adhesion mol-
ecules on the endothelium of the cerebral blood ves-
sels (vascular cell adhesion molecule  1, VCAM-1) and
pass through the BBB via diapedesis  [81]. Once in the
CNS parenchyma, they are reactivated by the local
antigen-presenting cells (APCs) (dendritic cells, mi-
croglia), which present myelin components to them
in complex with the major histocompatibility com-
plex (MHC) class  II. The reactivated T-lymphocytes
begin to secrete inflammatory cytokines, primari-
ly IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-17, and granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), which leads to
exacerbation of local inflammation, recruitment
of new immune effector cells, and damage to oli-
godendrocytes  [79]. IFN-γ and TNF-α increase per-
meability of the BBB exacerbating its damage and
are directly toxic to oligodendrocytes and neurons.
IL-17 promotes endothelial activation, while GM-CSF
is essential for the recruitment and activation of
monocytes  [82].
As discussed earlier, S1P can both maintain in-
tegrity of the BBB and contribute to its increased
permeability during inflammation. It is likely that in
the acute phase of MS against the background of el-
evated concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines,
the protective role of S1P-R
1
diminishes and BBB be-
comes permeable precisely in the presence of S1P.
However, as the active inflammation subsides, the
S1P-R
1
signaling could contribute to the restoration of
the barrier. Furthermore, according to the available
data, the S1P-R
2
expressed on endothelial cells and
astrocytes could be involved in pathological barrier
permeability in MS. Although there is a little direct
clinical evidence to support this, S1P-R
2
is considered
a potential target: its blockade is a possible way to
reduce neuroinflammation complementing the effect
of selective stimulation of S1P-R
1
.
Microglia and macrophages are activated within
the demyelinating lesion under the influence of cy-
tokines; at the same time, they phagocytose myelin
debris and themselves exacerbate the damage by re-
leasing reactive oxygen species, proteases, and pro-in-
flammatory cytokines. A  vicious cycle is formed:
immune cells destroy myelin, the released antigen
intensifies the immune response, and the resulting
inflammation causes increase of the damage to the
nervous tissue. Concurrently, B-lymphocytes that en-
ter the CNS differentiate into the plasma cells and
produce antibodies against myelin antigens, which
form immune complexes and activate the comple-
ment system, thereby accelerating destruction of my-
elin and axons. B-cells could also function as local
APCs sustaining activity of the pathogenic T-cells.
Consequently, demyelinating lesions characteristic of
MS are formed – areas in the white and subsequently
grey matter of the brain where the myelin sheath is
destroyed, axonal conduction is impaired, and there
are infiltrates of immune cells and reactive glial cells.
In the demyelinating lesions, S1P actively influences
microglial cells and astrocytes. As mentioned earlier,
S1P acts as a chemoattractant for microglia: the el-
evated levels of S1P have been detected in the de-
myelinating lesions. This may be due to the release
of S1P from the damaged cells or from the activated
endothelial cells. Microglia migrating in response to
this signal, on the one hand, participate in phagocy-
tosis of the myelin degradation products, which is
beneficial for the subsequent remyelination; on the
S1P – KEY SIGNALING MOLECULE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN MS 669
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
other hand, they themselves exacerbate inflammation
and release neurotoxic substances worsening axonal
damage. Interestingly, inhibition of the S1P-R
1
in as-
trocytes and microglia reduces production of certain
chemotactic factors. In particular, it was shown in the
experiment that blocking of the S1P-R
1
signal sup-
pressed the release of the chemokine CXCL5 by astro-
cytes and microglia, thereby potentially reducing in-
flux of the new immune cells into the lesion site  [83].
This demonstrates that the S1P signaling in the glial
cells sustains local inflammation in MS. Furthermore,
the S1P-R
3
activation increases synthesis of pro-in-
flammatory factors [IL-6, Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2),
etc.] by astrocytes  [53], i.e. reactive astrocytes ampli-
fy the inflammatory response under the influence of
S1P. Thus, within the demyelinating lesion, S1P pro-
motes pathological interaction between the immune
cells and neuroglia sustaining persistence of inflam-
mation. Over time, chronic inflammation progresses
to the phase of neurodegeneration: damaged axons,
lost neurons, and glial tissue are found within and
around the demyelinating lesions. It is believed that
each new relapse of MS causes irreversible damages
to axons, which accumulate and lead to progressive
neurological deficits. In the later stages of MS neu-
rodegeneration could be sustained without the direct
involvement of immune cells due to the chronic ac-
tivation of microglia, cytokine imbalance, and degen-
erative changes in the CNS environment (e.g. accu-
mulation of the neurotoxic metabolic by-products). In
this context, the mechanisms of endogenous remye-
lination are of particular interest. The S1P-R-mediated
signaling could stimulate differentiation of the oligo-
dendrocyte precursor cells. In the acute demyelinat-
ing lesions in MS, partial remyelination (the so-called
“shadow” demyelination with thin myelin sheaths) is
frequently observed, which is associated with the ac-
tivity of surviving oligodendrocytes. It is hypothesized
that the S1P present in the tissues could contribute
to this spontaneous remyelination, for example by
stimulating migration of the oligodendrocyte precur-
sor cells to the affected axons and accelerating their
maturation. However, in the progressive forms of MS,
depletion of the remyelination potential is observed,
largely due to depletion of the pool of oligodendro-
cyte precursor cells and unfavorable microenviron-
ment. Sphingolipid imbalances in MS (elevated cer-
amide levels, reduced S1P) may contribute to this
problem. Consequently, the S1P-receptors are regard-
ed as important regulators of remyelination process-
es in the CNS. Cells of the oligodendrocyte lineage
express several subtypes of these receptors (S1P-R
1
,
S1P-R
2
, S1P-R
3
, and S1P-R
5
) with their expression lev-
els changing as the cells mature. The oligodendrocyte
precursors are characterized by the predominance of
the S1P-R
1
expression, whereas S1P-R
5
dominates in
the mature oligodendrocytes. This differentiation-de-
pendent distribution of the receptors determines their
functional specialization in regulating the key stages
of remyelination: S1P-R
1
primarily regulates prolifera-
tion of the oligodendrocyte precursor cells by activat-
ing intracellular signaling cascades including ERK1/2,
Akt, and p38MAPK and migration via activation of
the signaling pathways associated with the Rho-de-
pendent regulation of cell motility, at the same time,
S1P-R
5
regulates differentiation and survival of the
mature oligodendrocytes  [84]. Taken together these
findings suggest that the S1P-R-mediated signaling is
involved in regulating proliferation, migration, and
differentiation of the oligodendrocyte lineage cells
as well as in maintaining survival of the mature oli-
godendrocytes. Thus, modulation of the “S1P-S1P-R”
pathway could be considered a potential therapeutic
approach aimed at enhancing remyelination process-
es in MS.
In MS, disruption of the “sphingolipid rheostat”
has been observed: reduced levels of S1P against the
background of ceramide accumulation in the affect-
ed tissues. This shift towards a “pro-apoptotic” state
could impair the function of oligodendrocytes and my-
elin regeneration. Thus, in the inactive demyelinating
lesions accumulation of the long-chain ceramides  [85]
and reduction in the certain neuroprotective gan-
gliosides were observed, which correlated with the
disease activity [86]. Elevated concentrations of cer-
amides (C16:0, C24:1, etc.) and sphingosine together
with the reduction in sphingomyelin are also found
in the blood plasma of the patients in the acute phase
of MS  [85]. These changes indicate predominance of
the sphingomyelin degradation pathways and accu-
mulation of the pro-apoptotic metabolites. It was ex-
perimentally demonstrated in the study that activity
of the acid sphingomyelinase in the blood plasma
of the patients with multiple sclerosis increased by
58%, as well as activity of alkaline ceramidase also
increased in the erythrocytes, which together con-
tributes to the enhanced formation of ceramide and
sphingosine and is accompanied by the relatively low
level of S1P  [87]. Such shift in metabolism is quite
capable of exacerbating the death of oligodendro-
cytes and neurons within the lesions. Furthermore,
an interesting theory regarding the MS progression
involves exosomes: during chronic inflammation mi-
croglia release exosomes enriched with ceramides and
other lipids, which diffuse into the brain tissue and
induce secondary damage to oligodendrocytes beyond
the primary demyelinating lesion. The elevated cera-
mide levels in exosomes correlated with the greater
degree of demyelination; it is believed that these ex-
tracellular vesicles trigger oligodendrocyte apoptosis
in the new areas contributing to the expansion of the
lesion [88, 89]. Thus, the altered sphingolipid profile
GANIN, ZAKHAROVA670
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
not only accompanies, but may also stimulate the MS
progression.
CONCLUSIONS
Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is not merely a
bioactive metabolite of the sphingolipid metabolism,
but an integrative signaling molecule that links met-
abolic processes to the functions of the cells in the
CNS and immune system both under normal con-
ditions and in pathological states. Acting via the
S1P-R
1
-S1P-R
5
and intracellular targets, S1P regulates
cell viability, autophagy, mitochondrial function, re-
dox balance, and gene expression, thereby controlling
metabolic pathways associated with the resistance of
neural tissue to damage and its reparative potential.
At the same time, S1P is involved in regulation of the
lymphocyte migration, BBB permeability, reactivity of
astrocytes and microglia, as well as survival, differ-
entiation, and functional activity of oligodendrocytes.
Thus, S1P mediates the link between the lipid metab-
olism and specific signaling functions of the brain.
These functions include maintenance of neuronal
excitability and synaptic transmission, intercellular
communication within the neurovascular unit, and
the process of remyelination. In other words, S1P is
involved not only in the metabolic support of the CNS
cells, but also in the regulation of the mechanisms
that determine nerve impulse conduction, stability of
neuroglial interactions, and structural and functional
integrity of the brain tissue.
In MS, disruption of the “sphingolipid rheostat”
characterized by the shift of the balance towards ac-
cumulation of ceramides and relative decrease in the
S1P levels may be regarded as one of the mechanisms
by which the system switches from the adaptive-re-
parative state to the pro-inflammatory and pro-apop-
totic one. This shift is associated with mitochondrial
dysfunction, increased oxidative stress, activation of
microglia and astrocytes, increased permeability of
BBB, impaired oligodendrocyte survival, and reduced
remyelination potential. Consequently, not only cellu-
lar metabolic homeostasis is disrupted, but also key
processes ensuring structural and functional integrity
of the CNS including neuroglial interactions, barrier
function of the BBB, and remyelination. Thus, the
“S1P–S1P receptor” axis should be regarded as one
of the central mechanisms of bidirectional commu-
nication between metabolism and specific functional
organization of the brain in MS. This may explain
high therapeutic significance of the S1P-dependent
signaling: its modulation allows simultaneous influ-
ence on the immune cell migration, BBB permea-
bility, glial cell reactivity, and reparative processes
in the CNS. Pharmacological modulation of the S1P
signaling has already demonstrated clinical efficacy:
functional antagonists/modulators of S1P-receptors
(Fingolimod, Siponimod, Osanimod, Ponesimod etc.)
reduce activity of the autoimmune process primar-
ily by disrupting the S1P-dependent regulation of
lymphocyte migration and also potentially exert di-
rect effects in the CNS through their influence on
the glial cells and endothelium. However, significant
limitations remain related to the tissue and recep-
tor non-specificity, inter-individual variability in re-
sponse, as well as incomplete understanding of the
components of the S1P system determining transition
from the inflammatory phase to the neurodegenera-
tive phase. Deeper understanding of the variability in
the biological effects of S1P signaling under different
conditions would provide the basis for the develop-
ment of more selective and safer therapeutic strate-
gies for MS aimed not only at suppressing neuroin-
flammation but also at supporting remyelination and
slowing neurodegenerative component of the disease.
Abbreviations
APCs antigen-presenting cells
BBB blood-brain barrier
CNS central nervous system
EAE experimental autoimmune encephalo-
myelitis
eNOS endothelial nitric oxide synthase
GM-CSF granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimu-
lating factor
GPCR G-protein-coupled receptor
HDL high-density lipoprotein
MBP myelin basic protein
MS multiple sclerosis
PLP proteolipid protein
S1P sphingosine-1-phosphate
S1P-R
1-5
sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors
(subtypes 1-5)
SPL sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase
VLA-4 very late antigen-4 (α4β1 integrin)
Contributions
D.A.  Ganin: search and analysis of the literature, man-
uscript writing. M.N.  Zakharova: study concept and
design, manuscript editing, supervision.
Funding
The study was conducted without external funding.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This work does not contain any studies involving hu-
man and animal subjects.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this work declare that they have no
conflicts of interest.
S1P – KEY SIGNALING MOLECULE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN MS 671
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
REFERENCES
1. Jakimovski, D., Bittner,S., Zivadinov, R., Morrow, S.A., Benedict, R. H., Zipp, F., and Weinstock-Guttman, B. (2024)
Multiple sclerosis, Lancet, 403, 183-202, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01473-3.
2. Ruskamo, S., Raasakka, A., Pedersen, J. S., Martel, A., Škubník, K., Darwish, T., Porcar, L., and Kursula, P.
(2022) Human myelin proteolipid protein structure and lipid bilayer stacking, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 79, 419,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04428-6.
3. Kister, A., and Kister, I. (2023) Overview of myelin, major myelin lipids, and myelin-associated proteins, Front.
Chem., 10, 1041961, https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.1041961.
4. Träger, J., Widder, K., Kerth, A., Harauz, G., and Hinderberger, D. (2020) Effect of cholesterol and myelin basic
protein (MBP) content on lipid monolayers mimicking the cytoplasmic membrane of myelin, Cells, 9, 529, https://
doi.org/10.3390/cells9030529.
5. Gomez-Larrauri, A., Presa, N., Dominguez-Herrera, A., Ouro, A., Trueba, M., and Gomez-Munoz, A. (2020) Role
of bioactive sphingolipids in physiology and pathology, Essays Biochem., 64, 579-589, https://doi.org/10.1042/
EBC20190091.
6. Gomez-Larrauri, A., Larrea-Sebal, A., Martín, C., and Gomez-Muñoz, A. (2025) The critical roles of bioactive
sphingolipids in inflammation, J.Biol. Chem., 301, 110475, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110475.
7. Cartier, A., and Hla, T. (2019) Sphingosine 1-phosphate: lipid signaling in pathology and therapy, Science, 366,
eaar5551, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar5551.
8. Takuwa, Y., Okamoto, Y., Yoshioka, K., and Takuwa, N. (2012) Sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling in physiology
and diseases, Biofactors, 38, 329-337, https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.1030.
9. Proia, R. L., and Hla,T. (2015) Emerging biology of sphingosine-1-phosphate: its role in pathogenesis and therapy,
J.Clin. Invest., 125, 1379-1387, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI76369.
10. McGinley, M. P., and Cohen, J. A. (2021) Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators in multiple sclerosis and
other conditions, Lancet, 398, 1184-1194, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00244-0.
11. Dumitrescu, L., Papathanasiou, A., Coclitu, C., Garjani, A., Evangelou, N., Constantinescu, C. S., Popescu, B. O.,
and Tanasescu, R. (2023) An update on the use of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators for the treat-
ment of relapsing multiple sclerosis, Expert Opin. Pharmacother., 24, 495-509, https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.
2023.2178898.
12. Gault, C. R., Obeid, L. M., and Hannun, Y. A. (2010) An overview of sphingolipid metabolism: from synthesis to
breakdown, Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 688, 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6741-1_1.
13. Santos, T. C. B., Dingjan, T., and Futerman, A. H. (2022) The sphingolipid anteome: implications for evolution
of the sphingolipid metabolic pathway, FEBS Lett., 596, 2345-2363, https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.14457.
14. Kumagai, K., and Hanada, K. (2019) Structure, functions and regulation of CERT, a lipid-transfer protein for the
delivery of ceramide at the ER-Golgi membrane contact sites, FEBS Lett., 593, 2366-2377, https://doi.org/10.1002/
1873-3468.13511.
15. Chakraborty, M., Jiang, X. C. (2013) Sphingomyelin and Its Role in Cellular Signaling, in Lipid-mediated Protein
Signaling. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Capelluto, D., ed.), vol 991, Springer, Dordrecht,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6331-9_1.
16. Tsui-Pierchala, B. A., Encinas, M., Milbrandt, J., and Johnson, E. M. (2002) Lipid rafts in neuronal signaling and
function, Trends Neurosci., 25, 412-417, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02215-4.
17. Ogretmen, B. (2018) Sphingolipid metabolism in cancer signalling and therapy, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 18, 33-50, https://
doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.96.
18. Qin, J., Berdyshev, E., Goya, J., Natarajan, V., and Dawson, G. (2010) Neurons and oligodendrocytes recycle
sphingosine 1-phosphate to ceramide: significance for apoptosis and multiple sclerosis, J.Biol. Chem., 285, 14134-
14143, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.076810.
19. Książek, M., Chacińska, M., Chabowski, A., and Baranowski, M. (2015) Sources, metabolism, and regulation of
circulating sphingosine-1-phosphate, J. Lipid Res., 56, 1271-1281, https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R059543.
20. Saluja, R., Kumar, A., Jain, M., Goel, S. K., and Jain, A. (2017) Role of sphingosine-1-phosphate in mast cell
functions and asthma and its regulation by non-coding RNA, Front. Immunol., 8, 587, https://doi.org/10.3389/
fimmu.2017.00587.
21. Li, H. Z., Pike, A. C. W., Chang, Y. N., Prakaash, D., Gelova, Z., Stanka, J., Moreau, C., Scott, H. C., Wunder, F.,
Wolf, G., Scacioc,A., McKinley, G., Batoulis, H., Mukhopadhyay,S., Garofoli,A., Pinto-Fernández,A., Kessler, B.M.,
Burgess-Brown, N. A., Štefanić, S., Wiedmer, T., Dürr, K. L., Puetter, V., Ehrmann, A., Khalid, S., Ingles-Prieto, A.,
Superti-Furga, G., and Sauer, D. B. (2025) Transport and inhibition of the sphingosine-1-phosphate exporter
SPNS2, Nat. Commun., 16, 1023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-55942-7.
GANIN, ZAKHAROVA672
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
22. Fang, C., Bian, G., Ren, P., Xiang, J., Song, J., Yu, C., Zhang, Q., Liu, L., Chen, K., Liu, F., Zhang, K., Wu, C., Sun, R.,
Hu, D., Ju, G., and Wang, J. (2018) S1P transporter SPNS2 regulates proper postnatal retinal morphogenesis,
FASEB J., 32, 3597-3613, https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201701116R.
23. Pyne, N.J., and Pyne, S. (2017) Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 signaling in mammalian cells, Molecules, 22,
344, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030344.
24. Zhang, H., Pluhackova, K., Jiang, Z., and Böckmann, R. A. (2016) Binding characteristics of sphingosine-1-phos-
phate to ApoM hints to assisted release mechanism via the ApoM calyx-opening, Sci. Rep., 6, 30655, https://
doi.org/10.1038/srep30655.
25. Fleming, J. K., Glass, T. R., Lackie, S. J., and Wojciak, J. M. (2016) A novel approach for measuring sphin-
gosine-1-phosphate and lysophosphatidic acid binding to carrier proteins using monoclonal antibodies and the
kinetic exclusion assay, J. Lipid Res., 57, 123-134, https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.D068866.
26. Blaho, V. A., Galvani,S., Engelbrecht, E., Liu,C., Swendeman, S.L., Kono,M., Proia, R.L., Steinman,L., Han,M.H.,
and Hla, T. (2015) HDL-bound sphingosine-1-phosphate restrains lymphopoiesis and neuroinflammation, Nature,
523, 342-346, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14462.
27. Ruiz, M., Frej, C., Holmér, A., Guo, L. J., Tran, S., and Dahlbäck, B. (2017) High-density lipoprotein-associated
apolipoprotein M limits endothelial inflammation by delivering sphingosine-1-phosphate to the sphingosine-1-
phosphate receptor 1, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 37, 118-129, https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308435.
28. Mineo, C., and Shaul, P. W. (2013) Regulation of signal transduction by HDL, J. Lipid Res., 54, 2315-2324, https://
doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R039479.
29. Saddar, S., Mineo, C., and Shaul, P. W. (2010) Signaling by the high-affinity HDL receptor scavenger receptor B
type I, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 30, 144-150, https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.196170.
30. Kiyozuka, K., Zhao, X., Konishi, A., Minamishima, Y. A., and Obinata, H. (2023) Apolipoprotein M supports S1P
production and conservation and mediates prolonged Akt activation via S1PR1 and S1PR3, J. Biochem., 174,
257-268, https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvad037.
31. Rosen, H., Stevens, R. C., Hanson, M., Roberts, E., and Oldstone, M. B. A. (2013) Sphingosine-1-phosphate and
its receptors: structure, signaling, and influence, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 82, 637-662, https://doi.org/10.1146/
annurev-biochem-062411-130916.
32. Galvani, S., Sanson, M., Blaho, V. A., Swendeman, S. L., Obinata, H., Conger, H., Dahlbäck, B., Kono, M., Proia,
R. L., Smith, J. D., and Hla, T. (2015) HDL-bound sphingosine-1-phosphate acts as a biased agonist for the en-
dothelial cell receptor S1P1 to limit vascular inflammation, Sci. Signal., 8, ra79, https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.
aaa2581.
33. Watterson, K. R., Johnston, E., Chalmers, C., Pronin, A., Cook, S. J., Benovic, J. L., and Palmer, T. M. (2002) Dual
regulation of EDG1/S1P(1) receptor phosphorylation and internalization by protein kinase C and G-protein-cou-
pled receptor kinase 2, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 5767-5777, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110647200.
34. Willinger, T., Ferguson, S. M., Pereira, J. P., De Camilli, P., and Flavell, R. A. (2014) Dynamin 2-dependent endo-
cytosis is required for sustained S1PR1 signaling, J. Exp. Med., 211, 685-700, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20131343.
35. Nomachi, A., Yoshinaga, M., Liu, J., Kanchanawong, P., Tohyama, K., Thumkeo, D., Watanabe, T., Narumiya, S.,
and Hirata, T. (2013) Moesin controls clathrin-mediated S1PR1 internalization in T cells, PLoS One, 8, e82590,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082590.
36. Kono, M., Tucker, A. E., Tran, J., Bergner, J. B., Turner, E. M., and Proia, R. L. (2014) Sphingosine-1-phos-
phate receptor 1 reporter mice reveal receptor activation sites in vivo, J. Clin. Invest., 124, 2076-2086,
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI71194.
37. Jiang, H., Chiang, C. Y., Chen, Z., Nathan, S., D’Agostino, G., Paulo, J. A., Song, G., Zhu, H., Gabelli, S. B., and
Cole, P. A. (2022) Enzymatic analysis of WWP2 E3 ubiquitin ligase using protein microarrays identifies autoph-
agy-related substrates, J.Biol. Chem., 298, 101854, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101854.
38. Yang, L., Han, Z., Tian, L., Tong, X., Lu, Y., Lu, B., Zhao, J., Wu, J., Fu, Y., and Cai, J. (2015) Sphingosine 1-phos-
phate receptor 2 and 3 mediate bone marrow-derived monocyte/macrophage motility in cholestatic liver injury
in mice, Sci. Rep., 5, 13423, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13423.
39. Garnier,O., and Vilgrain,I. (2023) Dialogue between VE-cadherin and sphingosine1 phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1)
for protecting endothelial functions, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24, 4018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24044018.
40. Chen, H., Qin, Y., Chou, M., Cyster, J. G., and Li, X. (2023) Transmembrane protein CD69 acts as an S1PR1 ago-
nist, eLife, 12, e88204, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88204.
41. Kempf, A., Tews, B., Arzt, M. E., Weinmann, O., Obermair, F. J., Pernet, V., Zagrebelsky, M., Delekate, A., Iobbi, C.,
Zemmar, A., Ristic, Z., Gullo, M., Spies, P., Dodd, D., Gygax, D., Korte, M., and Schwab, M. E. (2014) The sphin-
golipid receptor S1PR2 is a receptor for Nogo-A repressing synaptic plasticity, PLoS Biol., 12, e1001763, https://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001763.
S1P – KEY SIGNALING MOLECULE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN MS 673
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
42. Obinata, H., and Hla, T. (2019) Sphingosine 1-phosphate and inflammation, Int. Immunol., 31, 617-625, https://
doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxz037.
43. Hao, W., Luo, D., Jiang, Y., Wan, S., and Li, X. (2024) An overview of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2: struc-
ture, biological function, and small-molecule modulators, Med. Res. Rev., 44, 815-860, https://doi.org/10.1002/
med.22044.
44. An, S., Bleu, T., and Zheng, Y. (1999) Transduction of intracellular calcium signals through G protein-mediated
activation of phospholipase C by recombinant sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors, Mol. Pharmacol., 55, 787-794.
45. Gräler, M. H., Grosse,R., Kusch,A., Kremmer,E., Gudermann,T., and Lipp,M. (2003) The sphingosine 1-phosphate
receptor S1P4 regulates cell shape and motility via coupling to Gi and G12/13, J. Cell. Biochem., 89, 507-519,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.10537.
46. An, S., Zheng, Y., and Bleu, T. (2000) Sphingosine 1-phosphate-induced cell proliferation, survival, and relat-
ed signaling events mediated by G protein-coupled receptors Edg3 and Edg5, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 288-296,
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.1.288.
47. Li, C., Li, J. N., Kays, J., Guerrero, M., and Nicol, G. D. (2015) Sphingosine 1-phosphate enhances the excitability
of rat sensory neurons through activation of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors 1 and/or 3, J. Neuroinflamm.,
12, 70, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0286-8.
48. Skoug, C., Martinsson, I., Gouras, G. K., Meissner, A., and Duarte, J. M. N. (2022) Sphingosine-1-phosphate recep-
tors are located in synapses and control spontaneous activity of mouse neurons in culture, Neurochem. Res.,
47, 3114-3125, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-022-03664-3.
49. Dukala, D. E., and Soliven, B. (2016) S1P1 deletion in oligodendroglial lineage cells: effect on differentiation and
myelination, Glia, 64, 570-582, https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.22949.
50. Willems, E., Schepers, M., Piccart, E., Wolfs, E., Hellings, N., Ait-Tihyaty, M., and Vanmierlo, T. (2024) The sphin-
gosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 modulator ponesimod repairs cuprizone-induced demyelination and induces oli-
godendrocyte differentiation, FASEB J., 38, e23413, https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202301557RR.
51. Miron, V. E., Jung, C. G., Kim, H. J., Kennedy, T. E., Soliven, B., and Antel, J. P. (2008) FTY720 modulates hu-
man oligodendrocyte progenitor process extension and survival, Ann. Neurol., 63, 61-71, https://doi.org/
10.1002/ana.21227.
52. Singh, S. K., Kordula, T., and Spiegel, S. (2022) Neuronal contact upregulates astrocytic sphingosine-1-phos-
phate receptor 1 to coordinate astrocyte-neuron cross communication, Glia, 70, 712-727, https://doi.org/10.1002/
glia.24135.
53. Dusaban, S. S., Chun, J., Rosen, H., Purcell, N. H., and Brown, J. H. (2017) Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor
3 and RhoA signaling mediate inflammatory gene expression in astrocytes, J. Neuroinflamm., 14, 111, https://
doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0882-x.
54. Colombo, E., Di Dario, M., Capitolo, E., Chaabane, L., Newcombe, J., Martino, G., and Farina, C. (2014) Fingo-
limod may support neuroprotection via blockade of astrocyte nitric oxide, Ann. Neurol., 76, 325-337, https://
doi.org/10.1002/ana.24217.
55. Chen, Z., Doyle, T. M., Luongo, L., Largent-Milnes, T. M., Giancotti, L. A., Kolar, G., Squillace, S., Boccella, S.,
Walker, J. K., Pendleton, A., Spiegel, S., Neumann, W. L., Vanderah, T. W., and Salvemini, D. (2019) Sphin-
gosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 activation in astrocytes contributes to neuropathic pain, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 116, 10557-10562, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820466116.
56. Zahiri, D., Burow, P., Großmann, C., Müller, C. E., Klapperstück, M., and Markwardt, F. (2021) Sphingosine-1-phos-
phate induces migration of microglial cells via activation of volume-sensitive anion channels, ATP secretion
and activation of purinergic receptors, Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res., 1868, 118915, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118915.
57. Gandy, K. A., Canals, D., Adada, M., Wada, M., Roddy, P., Snider, A. J., Hannun, Y. A., and Obeid, L. M. (2013)
Sphingosine 1-phosphate induces filopodia formation through S1PR2 activation of ERM proteins, Biochem. J.,
449, 661-672, https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20120213.
58. Goutner, U. A., and Shupik, M. A. (2021) The role of sphingosine-1-phosphate in neurodegenerative diseases,
Bioorg. Khim., 47, 702-720, https://doi.org/10.31857/S0132342321050274.
59. Van Echten-Deckert, G. (2023) The role of sphingosine 1-phosphate metabolism in brain health and disease,
Pharmacol. Ther., 244, 108381, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108381.
60. Squillace, S., Niazi, F., Chen, J., Kim, S., Hsieh, J., and Salvemini, D. (2022) Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1
activation in the central nervous system drives cisplatin-induced cognitive impairment, J.Clin. Invest., 132,
e157738, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI157738.
61. Yokoyama, S., Koo, I., Aibara, D., Tian, Y., Murray, I. A., Collins, S. L., Coslo, D. M., Kono, M., Peters, J. M.,
Proia, R. L., Gonzalez, F. J., Perdew, G. H., and Patterson, A. D. (2024) Sphingosine kinase 2 regulates aryl
GANIN, ZAKHAROVA674
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocation and target gene activation, Adv. Sci., 11, e2400794, https://
doi.org/10.1002/advs.202400794.
62. Strub, G. M., Paillard, M., Liang, J., Gomez, L., Allegood, J. C., Hait, N. C., Maceyka, M., Price, M. M., Chen, Q.,
Simpson, D.C., Kordula, T., Milstien, S., Lesnefsky, E. J., and Spiegel, S. (2011) Sphingosine-1-phosphate produced
by sphingosine kinase 2 in mitochondria interacts with prohibitin 2 to regulate complex IV assembly and
respiration, FASEB J., 25, 600-612, https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.10-167502.
63. Xu, Z., Meng, Y., St-Germain, J., Afshari, A., Dixon, C. L., Heybrock, S., Zhao, Q., Weng, X., Chen, J., Collins, R.,
Hu, H., Zhou, Q., Sun, Q., Xu, P., Liu, W., Saftig, P., Raught, B., Fairn, G. D., and Neculai, D. (2025) Sphin-
gosine-1-phosphate signalling activates E-Syt1 to facilitate HDL-derived cholesterol transport, Nat. Cell Biol., 27,
918-930, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-025-01665-2.
64. Huang, F. Q., Wang, H. F., Yang, T., Yang, D., Liu, P., Alolga, R. N., Ma, G., Liu, B., Pan, A., Liu, S. J., and Qi,
L. W. (2025) Ceramides increase mitochondrial permeabilization to trigger mtDNA-dependent inflammation in
astrocytes during brain ischemia, Metabolism, 166, 156161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2025.156161.
65. Hallisey, V. M., and Schwab, S. R. (2023) Get me out of here: sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling and T cell exit
from tissues during an immune response, Immunol. Rev., 314, 120-138, https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.13219.
66. Weigert, A., Olesch, C., and Brüne, B. (2019) Sphingosine-1-phosphate and macrophage biology – how the sphinx
tames the big eater, Front. Immunol., 10, 1706, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01706.
67. Claes, N., Fraussen, J., Stinissen, P., Hupperts, R., and Somers, V. (2015) B cells are multifunctional players
in multiple sclerosis pathogenesis: insights from therapeutic interventions, Front. Immunol., 6, 642, https://
doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00642.
68. Bagdanoff, J.T., Donoviel, M.S., Nouraldeen,A., Carlsen,M., Jessop, T.C., Tarver,J., Fu,Q., Zhang,H., Hazelwood,J.,
Nguyen, H., Baugh, S., Gardyan, M., Terranova, K., Barbosa, J., Yan, J., Bednarz, M., Layek, S., Courtney, L. F.,
Taylor, J., Digeorge-Foushee, A., Gopinathan, S., Bruce, D., Smith, T., Moran, L., O’Neill, E., Kramer, J., Lai, Z.,
Kimball, S. D., Liu, Q., Sun, W., Yu, S., Swaffield, J., Wilson, A., Main, A., Carson, K., Oravecz, T., and Augeri, D. J.
(2009) Inhibition of sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase for the treatment of autoimmune disorders, J. Med. Chem.,
52, 3941-3953, https://doi.org/10.1021/jm900278w.
69. Spiegel, S., and Milstien, S. (2011) The outs and the ins of sphingosine-1-phosphate in immunity, Nat. Rev. Im-
munol., 11, 403-415, https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2974.
70. Crosby, C. M., and Kronenberg, M. (2018) Tissue-specific functions of invariant natural killer T cells, Nat. Rev.
Immunol., 18, 559-574, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-018-0034-2.
71. Gately, C. M., Podbielska, M., Counihan, T., Hennessy, M. J., Waldron, B., Selwood, D. L., and Doherty, D. G.
(2013) Invariant natural killer T-cell anergy to endogenous myelin acetyl-glycolipids in multiple sclerosis, J.
Neuroimmunol., 259, 41-49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2013.02.020.
72. Miyamoto, K., Miyake, S., and Yamamura, T. (2001) A synthetic glycolipid prevents autoimmune enceph-
alomyelitis by inducing TH2 bias of natural killer T cells, Nature, 413, 531-534, https://doi.org/10.1038/
35097097.
73. Wilkerson, B. A., Grass, G. D., Wing, S. B., Argraves, W. S., and Argraves, K. M. (2012) Sphingosine-1-phosphate
carrier-dependent regulation of endothelial barrier: HDL-S1P prolongs endothelial barrier enhancement as com-
pared with albumin-S1P via effects on levels, trafficking, and signaling of S1P1, J. Biol. Chem., 287, 44645-44653,
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.423426.
74. Spampinato, S. F., Obermeier, B., Cotleur, A., Love, A., Takeshita, Y., Sano, Y., Kanda, T., and Ransohoff, R. M.
(2015) Sphingosine-1-phosphate at the blood-brain barrier: can the modulation of S1P receptor 1 influence
the response of endothelial cells and astrocytes to inflammatory stimuli? PLoS One, 10, e0133392, https://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133392.
75. Li, Q., Chen, B., Zeng, C., Fan, A., Yuan, Y., Guo, X., Huang, X., and Huang, Q. (2015) Differential activation of
receptors and signal pathways upon stimulation by different doses of sphingosine-1-phosphate in endothelial
cells, Exp. Physiol., 100, 95-107, https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2014.082149.
76. Cruz-Orengo, L., Daniels, B. P., Dorsey, D., Basak, S. A., Grajales-Reyes, G. E., McCandless, E. E., Piccio, L.,
Schmidt, R. E., Cross, A. H., and Klein, R. S. (2014) Enhanced sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 expression
underlies female CNS autoimmunity susceptibility, J.Clin. Invest., 124, 2571-2584, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI73408.
77. Nishihara, H., Shimizu, F., Sano, Y., Takeshita, Y., Maeda, T., Abe, M., and Kanda, T. (2015) Fingolimod pre-
vents blood-brain barrier disruption induced by the sera from patients with multiple sclerosis, PLoS One, 10,
e0121488, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121488.
78. Hohlfeld, R., Dornmair, K., Meinl, E., and Wekerle, H. (2016) The search for the target antigens of multiple scle-
rosis, part 1: autoreactive CD4
+
T lymphocytes as pathogenic effectors and therapeutic targets, Lancet Neurol.,
15, 198-209, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00334-8.
S1P – KEY SIGNALING MOLECULE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN MS 675
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 5 2026
79. Bar-Or, A., and Li, R. (2021) Cellular immunology of relapsing multiple sclerosis: interactions, checks, and bal-
ances, Lancet Neurol., 20, 470-483, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00063-6.
80. Cahalan, S. M., Gonzalez-Cabrera, P. J., Nguyen, N., Guerrero, M., Cisar, E. A. G., Leaf, N. B., Brown, S. J.,
Roberts, E., and Rosen, H. (2013) Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 upregulation and amelioration of exper-
imental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by an S1P1 antagonist, Mol. Pharmacol., 83, 316-321, https://doi.org/
10.1124/mol.112.082958.
81. Zierfuss,B., Larochelle,C., and Prat,A. (2024) Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: causes, conse-
quences, and potential effects of therapies, Lancet Neurol., 23, 95-109, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00377-0.
82. Rahman, M. T., Ghosh, C., Hossain, M., Linfield, D., Rezaee, F., and Janigro, D. (2018) IFN-γ, IL-17A, or zonulin
rapidly increase the permeability of the blood-brain and small intestinal epithelial barriers: relevance for neu-
ro-inflammatory diseases, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 507, 274-279, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.11.021.
83. O’Sullivan, S. A., O’Sullivan, C., Healy, L. M., Dev, K. K., and Sheridan, G. K. (2018) Sphingosine 1-phosphate re-
ceptors regulate TLR4-induced CXCL5 release from astrocytes and microglia, J. Neurochem., 144, 736-747, https://
doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14313.
84. Roggeri, A., Schepers, M., Tiane, A., Rombaut, B., van Veggel, L., Hellings, N., Prickaerts, J., Pittaluga, A., and
Vanmierlo, T. (2020) Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators and oligodendroglial cells: beyond immuno-
modulation, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21, 7537, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207537.
85. Filippatou, A. G., Moniruzzaman, M., Sotirchos, E. S., Fitzgerald, K. C., Kalaitzidis, G., Lambe, J., Vasileiou, E.,
Saidha, S., Prince, J. L., Haughey, N., Calabresi, P. A., and Bhargava, P. (2020) Serum ceramide levels are altered
in multiple sclerosis, Mult. Scler. J., 27, 1506-1519, https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458520971816.
86. Podbielska, M., Ariga, T., and Pokryszko-Dragan, A. (2022) Sphingolipid players in multiple sclerosis: their influ-
ence on the initiation and course of the disease, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 5330, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105330.
87. Momchilova, A., Pankov, R., Alexandrov, A., Markovska, T., Pankov, S., Krastev, P., Staneva, G., Vassileva, E.,
Krastev, N., and Pinkas, A. (2022) Sphingolipid catabolism and glycerophospholipid levels are altered in erythro-
cytes and plasma from multiple sclerosis patients, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 7592, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147592.
88. Wies Mancini, V. S. B., Mattera, V. S., Pasquini, J. M., Pasquini, L. A., and Correale, J. D. (2024) Microglia-derived
extracellular vesicles in homeostasis and demyelination/remyelination processes, J.Neurochem., 168, 3-25, https://
doi.org/10.1111/jnc.16011.
89. Podbielska, M., Szulc, Z. M., Kurowska, E., Hogan, E. L., Bielawski, J., Bielawska, A., and Bhat, N. R. (2016)
Cytokine-induced release of ceramide-enriched exosomes as a mediator of cell death signaling in an oligoden-
droglioma cell line, J.Lipid Res., 57, 2028-2039, https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M070664.
Publishers Note. Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affiliations. AI tools may have been used in the translation or editing of this article.