ISSN 0006-2979, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2026, Vol. 91, No. 6, pp. 1006-1022 © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2026.
1006
Sex-Specific Relationships between Cerebral Cortex
Metabolism, Behavior, and ECG Parameters
in Rats under Physiological Conditions
and after Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Inhibition
Anastasia V. Graf
1
, Alexey V. Kazantsev
2
, and Victoria I. Bunik
3,4,5,a
*
1
Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Faculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3
Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University,
119991 Moscow, Russia
4
Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University,
119991 Moscow, Russia
5
Department of Biochemistry, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
a
e-mail: bunik@belozersky.msu.ru
Received February 18, 2026
Revised June 3, 2026
Accepted June 5, 2026
AbstractSex-specific interactions between neurosignaling systems, which generate, propagate, and ter-
minate signals in nervous tissue, and metabolic pathways that support these processes may underlie sex
differences in adaptation and therapeutic efficacy. This study aimed to characterize these interactions as
systemic indicators of sex-specific adaptive responses in a rat model of metabolic stress induced by the
inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC), which catalyzes the key reaction linking anaerobic
glycolysis to aerobic glucose oxidation. To inhibit brain PDC, we used a single intranasal administration
of methyl acetylphosphinate (MeAcP), a phosphinate analog of pyruvate, or dimethyl acetylphosphonate
(AcPMe
2
), a membrane-permeable precursor of phosphonate pyruvate analogs. Effects were assessed 24  h
post-administration by measuring biochemical and physiological parameters in the cerebral cortex, includ-
ing glutamate levels, glutamine synthetase (GS) activity, and activities of enzymes in the tricarboxylic acid
(TCA) cycle and affiliated pathways. Neurosignaling was evaluated using surrogate indicators: ECG (electro-
cardiogram) parameters and spontaneous behavior in the open field test. Relationships between measured
parameters were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, with the correlation strength clas-
sified according to the Chaddock’s scale. In control animals, no sex differences were observed in the mean
values of biochemical or ECG parameters. However, behavioral parameters (e.g., grooming and locomotion)
and the overall structure of correlations between the studied parameters exhibited marked sex dependence.
In control females, strong correlations were detected between ECG parameters and GS activity, whereas in
males, ECG parameters were strongly associated with malic enzyme (ME) activity. Male controls also showed
strong correlations between locomotor/exploratory behavior and activities of ME, PDC, and 2-oxoglutarate
dehydrogenase complex (OGDC). Administration of PDC inhibitors induced a sex-specific reorganization of
relationships between neurosignaling indicators and glutamate metabolism, which eliminated pronounced
sex differences in locomotor activity observed in controls, while revealing new sex-related differences in
glutamate levels, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and ME activities, grooming bout duration, and freezing
time. The reduction in glutamate levels observed in females following PDC inhibition was consistent with
the established decrease in de  novo glutamate synthesis from glucose under conditions of impaired substrate
flux through the TCA cycle. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the relationships among metabolic,
behavioral, and ECG parameters are inherently sex-specific. Moreover, the homeostatic response of the
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
SEX SPECIFIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BRAIN METABOLISM AND NEUROSIGNALING 1007
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
cerebral cortex to PDC inhibition reshapes these relationships, thereby modifying sex-dependent biochemical
and behavioral characteristics observed under control conditions.
DOI: 10.1134/S0006297926600444
Keywords: tricarboxylic acid cycle, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, pyruvate dehydrogenase inhibition,
methyl acetyl phosphinate, dimethyl acetylphosphonate, glutamine synthetase, glutamate dehydrogenase, malic
enzyme, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex, glutamate, sex differences, heart rate variability, behavior,
correlation analysis
INTRODUCTION
The multienzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase com-
plex (PDC) plays a central role in cellular energy
metabolism by catalyzing irreversible oxidation of
pyruvate, thereby linking cytoplasmic glycolysis with
mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and ox-
idative phosphorylation  [1]. Hereditary PDC deficien-
cies cause severe neurological pathologies  [2,  3], while
reduced PDC activity in the brain correlates with
cognitive deficits and mitochondrial dysfunction in
neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s dis-
ease  [4]. These correlations may stem from the asso-
ciation between PDC function and generation of key
neurotransmitters. For instance, PDC-dependent oxida-
tion of pyruvate (glycolysis end product) in the mito-
chondrial TCA cycle is linked to the de  novo synthesis
of glutamate, the principal excitatory neurotransmit-
ter, from glucose  [5]. Selective PDC inhibition reduces
brain glutamate levels  [6]. Glucose-derived acetyl-CoA
generated by PDC is the primary precursor for acetyl-
choline synthesis in cholinergic neurons [7].
Highly specific and efficient in  vivo inhibition
of PDC can be achieved by using synthetic pyruvate
analogs that either directly inhibit pyruvate dehydro-
genase (PDH) or act as membrane-permeable precur-
sors that generate such inhibitors intracellularly [6,
8,
9]. Intranasal administration of pyruvate analogs
ensures their delivery to the brain while bypassing
the blood–brain barrier, thus providing a useful mod-
el of metabolic stress resulting from impaired oxida-
tive glucose metabolism [6, 10].
Many physiological responses to stress are sex-de-
pendent. Accumulating evidence suggests that these
differences are closely linked to glutamate metabo-
lism. For example, female rats have been reported to
display higher basal levels of glutamate in the cere-
bral cortex
[11,
12] and higher glutamine synthetase
(GS) activity
[13], compared to males. Sex hormones,
particularly estrogens, modulate the glutamatergic
system
[14, 15] and activities of glutamate dehydro-
genase (GDH) [16] and GS [10], while brain glutamate
levels and interactions between glutamate and other
neurotransmitters influence sexual behavior in ani-
mals [17].
General principles of sexual dimorphism suggest
that male mammals may prioritize metabolic strate-
gies supporting active behavior and motor functions
more than females [18, 19]. Consequently, inherent
sex-dependent differences in the relationships be-
tween metabolic and neurosignaling systems in males
and females may shape their adaptive responses to
metabolic disorders. Despite this possibility, a com-
prehensive analysis of sex-specific relationships be-
tween brain metabolism, autonomic regulation, and
behavior under both physiological and metabolically
impaired conditions is lacking. These differences are
also typically overlooked during the development of
therapeutic interventions. For example, in TgF344-AD
rats (a model of Alzheimer’s disease), administration
of a cocktail of vitamin activators, including benfoti-
amine (PDC cofactor precursor), increased acetylcho-
line levels in the hippocampus in response to physio-
logical stimulation
[20]. Pharmacological activation of
PDC has also been explored as a strategy to alleviate
obesity-associated cardiomyopathy and non-alcoholic
fatty liver disease [21, 22]. However, none of these
studies considered potential sex differences in thera-
peutic responses, despite established associations be-
tween the pharmacological effects of thiamine, which
activates PDC and other thiamine-dependent enzymes,
and biological sex
[23, 24], which emphasizes the im-
portance of investigating sex-dependent mechanisms
of PDC regulation.
The present study aimed to characterize sex dif-
ferences in the systemic organization of physiologi-
cal and metabolic networks in rats under normal
conditions and 24 h after administration of pyruvate
analogs inhibiting PDC. Because modifications that
increase membrane permeability may enhance the
intracellular availability of PDC inhibitors, we com-
pared the effects of two structurally related pyru-
vate analogs: the charged methyl acetylphosphinate
(MeAcP) and the uncharged dimethyl acetylphospho-
nate (AcPMe
2
). MeAcP acts as a direct PDC inhibitor
but requires transporter-mediated passage across
biological membranes, similarly to pyruvate, while
AcPMe
2
is a precursor of PDC inhibitors (acetylphos-
phonate and its methyl ester) that is converted into
these compounds intracellularly by esterases (Fig.  1).
GRAF et al.1008
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Fig. 1. Structures of phosphinate (MeAcP) and phosphonate (AcPMe
2
) pyruvate analogs used in the study. The figure illus-
trates the conversion of AcPMe
2
(
uncharged membrane-permeable precursor) into PDC inhibitors methyl acetylphosphonate
(AcPMe) and acetylphosphonate (AcP) via sequential hydrolysis its methyl ester groups. Previously reported [8, 9, 25] inhi-
bition constants (K
i
) of these pyruvate analogs toward human and animal PDC are indicated.
To address the study objectives, we examined
sex differences both in the intrinsic relationships be-
tween PDC-dependent metabolic parameters of the
cerebral cortex and neurosignaling processes, and in
the systemic reorganization of these relationships in
response to PDC dysfunction. Neurosignaling process-
es were evaluated using behavioral and heart rate
regulation parameters as surrogate indicators.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reagents. AcPMe
2
and MeAcP sodium salt were
synthesized as described in  [6]. The purity of synthe-
sized compounds was confirmed by nuclear magnet-
ic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy analysis, including
the analysis immediately prior to animal experi-
ments. Other reagents were purchased from Sigma-
Aldrich (USA).
Animal experiments. All animal procedures
were conducted in accordance with the EU Directives
86/609/EEC and 2010/63/EU and were approved by the
Bioethics Committee of Lomonosov Moscow State Uni-
versity (protocol no.  137-d; November  11, 2021). Male
and female Wistar rats were housed under standard
conditions with a 12-h light/dark cycle and ad  libitum
access to water and food. Males (n =  24) aged 9–10
weeks and weighing 320  ±  15  g and females (n = 25)
aged 8.5-10 weeks and weighing 195  ±  10  g were used
in the study.
When assigning animals to experimental groups,
estrous cycle stages (proestrus, estrus, metestrus, di-
estrus) were taken into account to ensure a compa-
rable distribution of estrous cycle stages across all
groups. This approach minimized potential effects of
cyclic hormonal fluctuations on the studied param-
eters. To further reduce variability associated with
circadian rhythms, all experimental procedures, in-
cluding inhibitor administration, behavioral testing,
and sample collection, were performed at the same
time of day in both sexes.
Sample sizes were as follows: female control
group, n =  8; female AcPMe
2
group, n =  9; female
MeAcP group, n =  8; all male groups (control, AcPMe
2
,
MeAcP), n =  8 for each group.
Pyruvate analogs were dissolved in deionized
water to obtain 1  M solutions and administered in-
tranasally at a dose of 0.1  mmol/kg using a micropi-
pette. The solution was applied alternately to each
nostril, one drop at a time, to ensure uniform distri-
bution and prevent runoff. The volume administered
to each nostril did not exceed 20  μL. Control animals
received an equivalent volume of physiological saline
(0.9%  NaCl) using the same procedure.
This experimental design was based on previous
studies investigating in  vivo effects of selective inhi-
bition of 2-oxoacid dehydrogenases by phosphonate
analogs of their 2-oxo substrates [6,  26,  27]. Intra-
nasal administration was selected as a noninvasive
and easy route for delivering pyruvate analogs to the
brain while bypassing the blood–brain barrier. A sin-
gle administration was used to model acute metabolic
stress. Although neurotoxic agents administered in-
tranasally or intraperitoneally may induce behavioral
alterations through impairment of olfactory function
[28,  29], such effects were unlikely in the present
study because phosphonate analogs of 2-oxoacids
have not exhibited overt toxicity under similar ex-
perimental conditions [6, 26, 27]. Furthermore, the
behavioral parameters assessed in the open field test
were not dependent on olfactory cues.
Pharmacokinetic studies were not conducted;
the effects of treatment were assessed by measuring
physiological and biochemical parameters 24  h after
inhibitor administration. This time point was selected
based on previous studies [6,  26,  27] to exclude po-
tential influences of short-term stress associated with
substance administration.
SEX SPECIFIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BRAIN METABOLISM AND NEUROSIGNALING 1009
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Following physiological measurements, the ani-
mals were euthanized by decapitation. Brains were
extracted, and the cerebral cortex was dissected
on ice and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen
for 90  s. Tissue samples were stored at −70°C until
biochemical analysis.
Physiological tests. Neurosignaling processes
were evaluated using surrogate indicators, such as
spontaneous behavior in the open field test and heart
rate variability (HRV) parameters, which reflect the
contributions of autonomic regulation to behavioral
responses.
Open field test was conducted as previously de-
scribed [30]. Animals were observed for 3  min in
complete silence, under illumination with a 15  W red
lamp. The following parameters were recorded: loco-
motor activity (number of grid lines crossed), num-
ber of center entries, total time spent in the center,
number of rearings, total grooming time, number of
grooming bouts, mean duration of individual groom-
ing bout, and total freezing time.
ECG recording was performed for 3  min using
a non-invasive electrode placement. Disposable sil-
ver/silver chloride electrodes for newborns were at-
tached to the shaved ventrolateral chest surface and
secured using a custom harness with built-in ter-
minals to minimize motion artifacts. The terminals
were connected via harness wires to a connector
positioned at the withers and linked to a biopoten-
tial amplifier (10-20  kHz frequency band). The signal
was digitized at 1  kHz with an E14-440 analog-to-dig-
ital converter (L-Card, Russia) connected via USB to
a computer with the PowerGraph software (DISoft,
Russia).
Animals were pre-adapted to the recording con-
ditions. Two to three days before the experiment, rats
were placed in individual dark recording pens: first
without the harness (5-10  min), then with the har-
ness (10-15  min), until calm behavior was achieved.
On the day of the experiment, a brief additional ad-
aptation procedure was conducted before recording.
ECG was recorded in the first standard lead  [30].
Autonomic heart regulation was assessed by ana-
lyzing the time-domain HRV based on RR interval se-
quences as described previously  [30]. Parasympathet-
ic activity markers included mean RR interval (ms),
total variability evaluated as standard deviation (SD)
of all RR intervals (ms), variation range (dX, differ-
ence between maximum and minimum RR intervals,
ms), and RMSSD (root mean square of successive RR
interval differences, ms).
Sympathetic tone was characterized by the stress
index (SI), calculated from the following equation:
SI  =  AMo/(2×Mo×dX), where Mo is mode (most fre-
quent RR interval value,  s) and AMo is mode ampli-
tude (% of RR intervals corresponding to the mode).
Assessment of metabolic parameters in the
cerebral cortex. Glutamate concentrations were
determined in methanol–acetic acid extracts of the
cerebral cortex using an enzymatic assay based on
GDH reaction  [31]. Cerebral cortex homogenates were
prepared, and the activities of GDH, malate dehydro-
genase (MDH), NADP
+
-dependent malic enzyme (ME),
isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), GS, PDC, and OGDC
were measured using established methods  [26,  32].
Enzyme activities were expressed as μmol of sub-
strate converted per minute per gram of wet tissue
(μmol·min
−1
·g
−1
). PDC and OGDC activities were mea-
sured in the presence of thiamine diphosphate.
When analyzing enzyme activities, we account-
ed for the reversibility of PDC inhibitors used, which
precluded reliable assessment of in  vivo PDC inhibi-
tion based solely on activity measurements in tissue
homogenates  [6,  33]. Therefore, the in  vivo effects of
PDC inhibitors were inferred from a composite pro-
file of PDC-related metabolic alterations measured
in  vitro relative to control animals.
Statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using
STATISTICA 12.0 and GraphPad Prism 10.4.1. Results
are presented as mean  ±  standard error of mean
(SEM). A two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the
effects of “sex” and “inhibitor” factors, as well as
their interaction, followed by Sidak’s post hoc test to
assess differences between groups. Differences were
considered significant at p ≤  0.05 and indicative of a
trend at p ≤  0.1.
Correlation analysis was performed used Spear-
man’s rank correlation coefficient. The strength of
associations was interpreted according to the Chad-
dock’s scale  [34]. Strong correlations (r ≥  0.7) were
characterized by p ≤  0.05. No correction for multiple
comparisons was applied, as the primary interpreta-
tion relied on correlation strength and because appro-
priate correction is nontrivial in heterogeneous cor-
relation structures  [35]. Since conclusions were based
on convergent correlation patterns, the likelihood of
random associations was substantially reduced.
RESULTS
Effect of AcPMe
2
and MeAcP on sexual dimor-
phism in behavioral and ECG parameters. Table  1
summarizes two-way ANOVA results for ECG and
open field test parameters in male and female rats
across control and PDC inhibitor groups. No statis-
tically significant main effects of sex or treatment
were observed for the HRV values. However, analy-
sis across all groups revealed trends toward the ef-
fect of sex on mean RR interval duration (F
1,43
=  3.7;
p =  0.06) and toward the effect of PDC inhibitors on
RMSSD (F
2,43
=  2.4; p =  0.11) (Table  1).
GRAF et al.1010
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
In contrast to ECG measures, behavioral parame-
ters in the control groups demonstrated clear sexual
dimorphism. Compared with control males, control
females showed higher locomotor activity, increased
numbers of center entries, and more frequent groom-
ing bouts.
PDC inhibitors modified sex differences in be-
havioral parameters, as evidenced by significant
“sex”  ×  “inhibitor” interactions for freezing time
(F
2,44
=  3.6; p =  0.04) and number of grooming bouts
(F
2,44
=  4.6; p =  0.02) (Table  1). Females exhibited
greater sensitivity to both compounds; specifically,
AcPMe
2
significantly reduced grooming bouts, while
MeAcP significantly increased freezing time. MeAcP in-
duced a sex difference in freezing time that was ab-
sent under control conditions. Inhibitor treatment also
amplified sex differences in grooming bout duration
(Table  1). Importantly, the reduction in the frequency
of grooming bouts in females following MeAcP was not
accompanied by changes in the locomotor activity, sug-
gesting that this effect is unlikely to reflect nonspecific
behavioral suppression or motor impairment. The de-
crease in grooming was observed only in females and
was combined with increased freezing time, indicat-
ing a broader reorganization of behavioral patterns.
Consistent with previous reports, reduction in groom-
ing frequency in conjunction with other behavioral
changes may reflect alterations in emotional state and
should be interpreted differently than an isolated de-
crease in the number of grooming bouts  [36].
Unlike duration of grooming bout and freezing
time, where PDC inhibitors induced sex differences
absent in controls, sex differences in locomotor ac-
tivity observed in controls were abolished following
PDC inhibitor treatment, due to opposing directional
effects in males and females (Table  1).
Therefore, PDC inhibitors altered sexual dimor-
phism in rat behavior, primarily due to a greater re-
sponsiveness in females compared with males. Incon-
trast, ECG parameters remained largely unaffected in
both sexes. This difference suggests that intranasally
administered PDC inhibitors may preferentially influ-
ence central neural circuits governing behavior rath-
er than peripheral autonomic mechanisms controlling
cardiac activity.
Effect of AcPMe
2
and MeAcP on glutamate
levels and activities of enzymes of the pyruvate
and glutamate metabolic nodes. We assessed the
activities of enzymes of the pyruvate and glutamate
metabolic nodes, as well as glutamate levels, in the
cerebral cortex. As shown in Table  2, control males
and females did not differ significantly in any of
the measured parameters. However, administration
of PDC inhibitors revealed sex-dependent differenc-
es in several metabolic indices. Two-way ANOVA re-
vealed significant effects of sex on the ME activity
(F
1,44
=  14.3; p =  0.0005), GDH activity (F
1,44
=  12.1;
p =  0.001), and glutamate levels (F
1,44
=  6.8; p =  0.01).
Trend-level effects of sex (p ≤  0.1) were observed for
the OGDC and GS activities. A significant “sex”  ×  “in-
hibitor” interaction was established for MDH activity
(F
2,43
=  3.9; p =  0.03). In addition, PDC activity was
also significantly affected by the “inhibitor” factor
(F
2,44
=  4.0; p =  0.02) (Table  2).
Biochemical alterations relative to the control
were observed exclusively in females and were most
pronounced following administration of the stronger
inhibitor, MeAcP. In these animals, glutamate levels
were significantly reduced compared with controls,
and PDC activity was lower than in the AcPMe
2
-treat-
ed group. No significant treatment-induced changes
were detected in males (Table  2).
Therefore, PDC inhibitors induced sex-specific
differences in parameters associated with both the
pyruvate metabolic node (ME activity) and the glu-
tamate metabolic node (GDH activity and glutamate
levels), whereas no such differences were present
in control animals. However, significant biochem-
ical changes relative to controls were observed in
females only, particularly a reduction in glutamate
levels after MeAcP treatment. These results indicate
a greater metabolic sensitivity of the female cerebral
cortex to PDC inhibition.
Correlation analysis between physiological
and biochemical parameters in control male and
female rats. Given the close relationship between
physiological functions and cerebral cortex metabo-
lism, correlation analysis was performed to charac-
terize interactions between metabolic and neurosig-
naling systems. Correlation strength was assessed
using the absolute value of the Spearman’s rank cor-
relation coefficient  (r) according to the Chaddock’s
scale  [34]. Strong correlations (r ≥  0.7) were consid-
ered biologically meaningful only when supported by
statistical significance (p ≤  0.05), visual inspection of
correlation networks (Fig.  S1, Online Resource  1), and
distinct sex-specific correlation patterns (Table  S1,
Online Resource  1), as the marked differences in
correlation structures between males and females
suggest that these associations are unlikely to have
arisen by chance. Inaddition to statistical and graph-
ical validation, the observed correlations in control
animals were consistent with established physiolog-
ical mechanisms. In both sexes, parameters reflect-
ing parasympathetic regulation (dX, RMSSD, and SD)
positively correlated with one another, whereas each
of them exhibited negative correlations with the
stress index (SI), an indicator of sympathetic activity
(Table  S1, Online Resource  1). The concordant pos-
itive relationships among parasympathetic markers
(dX, RMSSD, SD) and their inverse relationships with
SI are consistent with the physiological antagonism
SEX SPECIFIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BRAIN METABOLISM AND NEUROSIGNALING 1011
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Table  1. HRV and behavioral parameters in the open field test in females  (♀) and males  (♂) of the control
groups (n =  8 in each group) and after administration of AcPMe
2
(females, n =  9; males, n =  8) or MeAcP (n = 8
in each group)
Physiological parameter Group Control AcPMe
2
MeAcP
RR intervals
(Factor “sex” F
1,43
 =3.7; p =0.06)
116.2  ±  2.0 126.0  ±  4.1 117.4  ±  1.3
125.8  ±  3.2 123.4  ±  2.6 129.0  ±  7.2
SD 4.7  ±  0.7 6.2  ±  0.9 5.5  ±  0.4
5.0  ±  0.8 5.8  ±  0.8 7.1  ±  2.1
dX 38.9  ±  6.7 47.7  ±  5.3 47.9  ±  2.9
37.9  ±  5.3 63.1  ±  10.9 56.6  ±  18.8
RMSSD
(Factor “inhibitor” F
2,43
 =2.4; p =0.11)
2.9  ±  0.4 4.7  ±  0.8 4.9  ±  0.8
3.4  ±  0.6 4.3  ±  1.1 6.3  ±  2.2
SI 2.1  ±  0.4 1.1  ±  0.3 0.9  ±  0.1
1.8  ±  0.5 0.9  ±  0.2 2.2  ±  0.9
Number of grooming bouts
(Factor “sex” F
1,43
 =71.0; p <0.0001;
Factor “inhibitor” F
1,43
 =3.7; p =0.06;
Interaction F
2,43
 =3.2; p =0.048)
15.5  ±  1.7*
#
10.6  ±  0.7*
#
11.6  ±  1.3*
#
2.8  ±  1.0
#
2.0  ±  0.5
#
5.6  ±  2.1
#
Duration of a single grooming bout
(Factor “sex” F
1,43
 =15.3; p =0.0003)
0.9  ±  0.1 1.5  ±  0.3 1.7  ±  0.3
#
4.2  ±  1.3 4.3  ±  1.3 5.2  ±  1.6
#
Total grooming time 13.8  ±  2.2 15.9  ±  3.6 18.2  ±  3.2
12.6  ±  5.1 9.0  ±  3.5 21.0  ±  5.2
Freezing time
(Interaction of factors “sex” and “inhibitor”
F
1,44
 =12.1; p =0.001)
1.6  ±  0.8* 6.9  ±  2.8 12.4  ±  5.5*
#
6.9  ±  3.1 3.3  ±  2.0 1.3  ±  0.4
#
Time in the center 23.2  ±  2.4 35.8  ±  5.2 26.6  ±  6.1
28.9  ±  9.5 31.1  ±  4.0 22.2  ±  6.8
Number of rearings
(Factor “sex” F
1,43
 =2.6; p =0.11)
25.4  ±  1.9 16.9  ±  1.8 20.2  ±  3.1
16.0  ±  2.7 16.9  ±  4.7 17.9  ±  2.8
Number of center entries
(Factor “sex” F
1,43
 =16.9; p =0.0002)
7.9  ±  1.0
#
6.3  ±  1.3 7.4  ±  1.3
#
3.6  ±  0.9
#
3.8  ±  0.9 3.3  ±  0.9
#
Locomotor activity
(Factor “sex” F
1,43
 =8.9; p =0.005)
73.3  ±  6.9
#
65.8  ±  5.9 62.3  ±  8.1
49.5  ±  6.5
#
55.4  ±  4.1 51.9  ±  3.4
Note. For each physiological parameter, two-way ANOVA results (F and p values) are provided for the significances of fac-
tors and their interactions with p ≤  0.1. The results of Sidak’s post hoc test are indicated as follows: *  values significantly
different due to PDC inhibition; #  values significantly different between females and males. Significant (p <  0.05) factors and
differences are marked in bold; trends (p ≤  0.1) are indicated in italics.
GRAF et al.1012
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Table 2. Activities of enzymes of the pyruvate and glutamate metabolic nodes and glutamate levels in female(♀)
and male (♂) rats of control groups (n = 8 in each group) and after administration of AcPMe
2
(females, n = 9;
males, n = 8) or MeAcP (n = 8 in each group)
Biochemical parameter Group Control AcPMe
2
MeAcP
MDH
(Interaction of factors F
2,43
 =3.9; p =0.03)
456.9  ±  39.9 433.8  ±  31.4 401.5  ±  14.7
373.7  ±  14.7 354.1  ±  16.4 428.7  ±  23.5
ME
(Factor “sex” F
1,44
 =14.3; p =0.0005)
0.69  ±  0.06 0.63  ±  0.10 0.61  ±  0.07
#
0.82  ±  0.08 0.92  ±  0.10 0.95  ±  0.09
#
PDC
(Factor “inhibitor” F
2,44
 =4.0; p =0.02)
0.58  ±  0.05 0.72  ±  0.07^ 0.36  ±  0.08
#
^
0.54  ±  0.11 0.62  ±  0.10 0.44  ±  0.09
IDH 1.11  ±  0.12 0.89  ±  0.07 0.97  ±  0.06
1.08  ±  0.08 0.96  ±  0.07 1.03  ±  0.08
OGDC
(Factor “inhibitor” F
2,44
 =2.1; p =0.1)
0.71  ±  0.07 0.67  ±  0.07 0.59  ±  0.06
0.91  ±  0.04 0.92  ±  0.04 0.87  ±  0.04
GDH
(Factor “sex” F
1,44
 =12.1; p =0.001)
1.41  ±  0.10 1.84  ±  0.24
#
1.90  ±  0.14
#
1.35  ±  0.10 1.31  ±  0.11
#
1.23  ±  0.09
#
GS
(Factorsex” F
1,44
 =2.4; p =0.13)
72.1  ±  2.3 78.2  ±  2.9 72.9  ±  2.2
79.3  ±  3.7 78.9  ±  4.1 77.6  ±  4.2
Glutamate
(Factor “inhibitor” F
2,44
 =4.2; p =0.02;
Factor “sex” F
1,44
 =6.8; p =0.01;
Interaction of factors F
2,44
 =2.8; p =0.07)
14.6  ±  0.5* 14.9  ±  0.7^ 12.4  ±  0.5*
#
^
15.1  ±  0.2 15.3  ±  0.5 14.9  ±  0.4
#
Note. For each biochemical parameter, two-way ANOVA results (F and p values) are provided for the significances of fac-
tors and their interactions with p ≤  0.1. The results of Sidak’s post hoc test are indicated as follows: *  values significantly
different due to PDC inhibition; #  values significantly different between females and males; ^ values significantly different
between AcPMe
2
and MeAcP groups. Significant (p <  0.05) factors and differences are marked in bold; trends (p ≤  0.1) are
indicated in italics.
between parasympathetic and sympathetic branches
of autonomic heart rate regulation. Furthermore, the
overall patterns of correlations between autonomic
regulation parameters in males and females were
similar, reflecting general principles of autonomic
regulation for both sexes.
In contrast to autonomic regulation, correlations
between autonomic and behavioral parameters ex-
hibited pronounced sexual dimorphism, although the
direction of these associations remained physiologi-
cally plausible. For example, exploratory behavior
correlated positively with increased parasympathetic
activity and reduced sympathetic activation. Inmales,
exploratory activity showed strong positive correla-
tions with parasympathetic regulation parameters.
Specifically, the number of rearings correlated posi-
tively with SD (r =  0.8) and dX (r =  0.9). The number
of center entries also correlated positively with SD
(r =  0.8) and dX (r =  0.8). The locomotor activity was
positively associated with dX (r =  0.71). Conversely, SI
negatively correlated with exploratory behavior, in-
cluding the number of rearings (r =  −0.79) and center
entries (r =  −0.75). In females, these correlations were
absent, whereas several associations not observed in
males emerged. For example, the RR interval dura-
tion correlated positively with the number of groom-
ing bouts (r =  0.73). These sex-specific relationships
between behavioral and ECG parameters may reflect
sex differences in the coupling between behavior and
autonomic regulation.
SEX SPECIFIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BRAIN METABOLISM AND NEUROSIGNALING 1013
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Sexual dimorphism was also evident in correla-
tions between behavioral parameters in control ani-
mals (Table  S1, Online Resource  1). In females, freez-
ing time positively correlated with total grooming
time (r =  0.71), whereas locomotor activity negatively
correlated with the number of rearings (r =  −0.78).
Inmales, these parameters were positively correlated
(r =  0.81). These differences are consistent with the
behavioral profile of females, which exhibited great-
er locomotor activity but fewer rearings than males
(Table  1). Moreover, the female-specific positive cor-
relation between rearings and grooming behavior
(r =  0.75) may indicate a linkage between vertical ex-
ploratory activity and emotional reactivity that is not
characteristic of males.
Tables  3 and  4 present selected correlations be-
tween physiological parameters and metabolic char-
acteristics of the pyruvate (Table  3) and glutamate
(Table  4) nodes extracted from the complete correla-
tion matrix (Table  S1 in the Online Resource  1). Over-
all, behavioral and ECG parameters – indicators of
neurosignaling function – were predominantly asso-
ciated with the pyruvate metabolic node in males and
the glutamate metabolic node in females. In males,
seven behavioral and ECG parameters showed strong
correlations with the activity of ME, a decarboxylat-
ing malate dehydrogenase that generates pyruvate
(Table  3). In the cerebral cortex, the ME activity was
strongly associated with HRV indices, including SD
(r =  0.81) and dX (r =  0.71), and negatively associat-
ed with SI (r =  −0.71). The ME activity also correlat-
ed positively with exploratory behavior parameters,
including the number of rearings (r =  0.80), number
of center entries (r =  0.84), and locomotor activity
(r =  0.71). There were also trends toward correla-
tions between the locomotor activity and PDC activity
(r =  −0.69) and between the grooming bout duration
and MDH activity (r =  0.68).
Analysis of activities of enzymes belonging to
the glutamate metabolic node revealed only three
strong correlations in control males: IDH activity
correlated negatively with the time spent in the cen-
ter (r =  −0.89) and positively with the grooming bout
duration (r =  0.71), whereas GDH activity correlated
negatively with freezing time (r =  −0.81). Trends to-
ward positive associations between time spent in the
center and both OGDC and GDH activities were also
observed (r =  0.68, p <  0.1) (Table  4).
Unlike control males characterized by the lack
of significant associations between GS activity and
Table  3. Spearman’s correlations between the enzymatic activities of pyruvate node and physiological param-
eters in females  (♀) and males  (♂) of control groups (n =  8 in each group) and after administration of AcPMe
2
(females, n =  9; males, n =  8) or MeAcP (n =  8 in each group)
Control
MDH
ME PDC
♀♂♀
♀♂
RR intervals −0.12 0.10 0.45 0.48 0.29 0.02
SD −0.4 0.36 −0.26 0.81 −0.26 −0.26
dX −0.4 0.26 −0.22
0.71 −0.31 −0.55
RMSSD −0.02 0.05 −0.4 0.36 0.62 −0.31
SI 0.26 −0.33 0.21 0.71 0.38 0.21
Number of grooming bouts 0.32 0.17 −0.06 −0.02 −0.26 0.54
Duration of a grooming bout 0.29
0.68 0.33 −0.14 0.10 −0.07
Total grooming time 0.43 0.36 −0.10 −0.17 −0.43 0.60
Freezing time 0.25 −0.19 −0.25 0.78 −0.30 0.20
Time in center −0.50 −0.07 0.43 0.50 0.50 −0.11
Number of rearings 0.18 0.43 −0.55 0.80 −0.50 −0.54
Number of center entries −0.11 0.57 −0.14
0.84 −0.22 −0.29
Locomotor activity −0.12 0.45 0.46
0.71 0.43 0.69
GRAF et al.1014
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Table 3 (cont.)
AcPMe
2
MDH ME PDC
♂♀♂♀
RR intervals 0.63 0.31 −0.20 0.64 −0.02 0.36
SD −0.54 0.36 −0.44 −0.57 −0.55 0.45
dX −0.47 −0.07 −0.40 −0.12 −0.58 0.33
RMSSD −0.15 −0.24 −0.22 0.17 −0.52 −0.24
SI
0.62 −0.12 0.40 0.62 0.30 −0.57
Number of grooming bouts 0.33 0.48 −0.03 0.18 −0.18 0.05
Duration of a grooming bout −0.20 0.32 0.07 −0.11 0.23 −0.14
Total grooming time 0.13 0.47 0.03 0.02 0.18 −0.28
Freezing time −0.53 0.21 −0.27 0.21 0.02
0.75
Time in center 0.70 −0.01 0.08 −0.34 0.07 −0.04
Number of rearings −0.25 −0.14 −0.57 0.17 −0.48 0.43
Number of center entries −0.17 −0.02 −0.11 −0.39 0.28 0.61
Locomotor activity −0.05 0.33 0.38 −0.43 0.52 0.52
MeAcP
MDH ME PDC
♂♀
RR intervals 0.60 −0.36 0.17 −0.43 0.17 0.31
SD 0.71 0.19 0.67 0.24 0.12 −0.31
dX −0.11 0.26 0.06 0.21 0.50 −0.14
RMSSD 0.33 0.19 0.48 0.26 0.24 −0.29
SI −0.31 −0.21 −0.38 −0.24 −0.14 0.50
Number of grooming bouts 0.19 −0.40 −0.18 −0.32 −0.05
0.72
Duration of a grooming bout 0.19 −0.11 0.07 0.14 0.12 −0.07
Total grooming time −0.17 −0.29 −0.24 −0.10 0.00 0.45
Freezing time 0.19 −0.28 −0.07 −0.49 −0.19 −0.40
Time in center
0.67 0.61 0.93 0.44 0.19 −0.49
Number of rearings −0.10 −0.19 0.48 −0.18 0.14 0.23
Number of center entries 0.66 0.49 0.68 0.49 −0.15 −0.31
Locomotor activity 0.40 0.24 0.50 0.29 0.14 0.02
Note. Each cell shows the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient  (r) for the respective parameter pair. Significant correlations
(p <  0.05) are shown in red bold; trends (p <  0.1) are indicated in red italics. PDC activity was measured in the presence of
thiamine diphosphate. The enzymes and sexes of control or experimental groups, showing significant correlations with the
physiological parameters, are marked in red.
SEX SPECIFIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BRAIN METABOLISM AND NEUROSIGNALING 1015
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Table  4. Spearman’s correlations between the activities of glutamate node enzymes and physiological parameters in females  (♀) and males  (♂) of
control groups (n =  8 in each group) and after administration of AcPMe
2
(females, n =  9; males, n =  8) or MeAcP (n =  8 in each group)
Control
IDH OGDC GDH GS Glutamate
♀♂♀♂♀♂♀♂
RR interval 0.10 0.10 −0.17 −0.12 0.31 0.48 0.14 −0.55 −0.26 0.45
SD −0.02 −0.38 −0.21 −0.07 0.21 0.52
0.88 0.14 0.02 −0.05
dX −0.11 −0.43 −0.3 −0.02 0.26 0.38
0.84 0.24 0.01 −0.24
RMSSD 0.05 −0.14 −0.19 −0.50 −0.1 0.00 0.62 0.48 0.36 −0.55
SI 0.05 0.33 0.31 0.12 −0.14 −0.57
0.74 0.10 −0.12 −0.14
Number of grooming bouts −0.40 0.17 0.04 −0.56 −0.6 −0.02 0.02 0.34 0.63 −0.22
Duration of a grooming bout 0.33
0.71 0.17 −0.29 0.38 −0.54 0.19 −0.32 −0.05 −0.11
Total grooming time −0.19 0.48 −0.17 −0.45 −0.12 −0.33 −0.05 0.07 0.48 −0.05
Freezing time −0.14 0.23 0.22 −0.58 0.11
0.81 −0.16 −0.05 0.41 −0.06
Time in center −0.24
0.89 −0.35 0.68 0.45 0.68 −0.28 −0.04 −0.50 0.50
Number of rearings −0.60 −0.46 −0.47 0.25 −0.37 0.57 0.08 0.11 0.32 −0.07
Number of center entries 0.35 −0.49 0.02 0.47 0.25 0.54
0.67 0.07 0.08 0.14
Locomotor activity 0.58 −0.07 0.11 0.38 0.40 0.36 0.05 −0.05 −0.43 −0.14
AcPMe
2
IDH OGDC GDH GS Glutamate
♂♀♂♀ ♀♂♀♂
RR interval −0.48 −0.24 −0.25 0.02 0.40 0.26 −0.23 0.07 0.15 0.33
SD −0.30 −0.21 −0.54 0.05 0.36 0.29 0.64 0.12 −0.14 0.05
dX −0.17 −0.10 −0.48 −0.10 0.33 0.19 0.63 −0.05 −0.15 −0.05
RMSSD −0.12
0.74 −0.30 0.17 0.18 0.45 0.58 0.38 −0.05 0.62
SI 0.57 0.17 0.73 −0.12 −0.40 −0.10 −0.50 0.02 0.08 −0.07
Number of grooming bouts 0.19 −0.48 −0.20 −0.10 0.25
0.70 0.51 0.60 −0.46 0.03
GRAF et al.1016
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Table 4 (cont.)
Duration of a grooming bout 0.10 0.75 −0.40 −0.29 −0.31 −0.21 −0.10 −0.57 −0.40 −0.14
Total grooming time 0.13 0.04 −0.32 −0.27 −0.62 0.33 0.13 0.00 −0.55 0.28
Freezing time −0.37 0.12 −0.52 0.26 0.12 −0.26 0.18 0.16 −0.47 −0.21
Time in center −0.30 −0.47 −0.28 0.48 −0.02 0.07 0.35 0.08 0.12 0.27
Number of rearings −0.52 0.52 −0.33 −0.55
0.67 0.02 0.72 0.81 0.22 −0.07
Number of center entries −0.26
0.83 −0.37 0.73 −0.09 −0.24 0.51 0.71 0.01 −0.02
Locomotor activity −0.02 0.64 0.17 −0.19 −0.05 −0.31 −0.18 −0.31 0.12 −0.64
MeAcP
IDH OGDC GDH GS Glutamate
♂♀♂♀♂♀♂
RR interval −0.36 −0.14 −0.14 0.48 −0.60 −0.12 0.24 −0.36 0.05 −0.29
SD −0.36
0.83 0.26 0.33 −0.29 −0.33 0.57 −0.05 0.07 −0.05
dX −0.34 −0.57 0.57 0.38 −0.56 −0.17 −0.60 −0.05 −0.06 0.00
RMSSD −0.43 −0.50 0.64 0.48 −0.50 −0.21 0.14 −0.21 0.17 −0.29
SI 0.07 0.67 −0.55 −0.29
0.79 0.14 0.07 0.07 −0.10 0.19
Number of grooming bouts 0.10 −0.04 −0.02 −0.14 0.55 −0.47 −0.63 −0.22 −0.35 0.32
Duration of a grooming bout 0.00 0.21 0.38
0.96 0.81 −0.07 0.07 −0.39 0.17 −0.61
Total grooming time −0.02 0.31 0.36
0.81 −0.40 −0.29 −0.26 −0.19 −0.07 −0.10
Freezing time −0.50 −0.01 −0.04 −0.15 −0.07 0.38 0.17 0.19 0.13 0.15
Time in center 0.12 0.02 0.43
0.76 −0.02 0.44 0.17 0.61 −0.52 0.51
Number of rearings 0.43 0.00 0.17 −0.65 0.31 −0.18 −0.05 −0.28 −0.38 0.12
Number of center entries 0.22 −0.53 −0.29
0.80 −0.05 −0.17 0.22 0.05 −0.07 0.31
Locomotor activity 0.48 −0.05 −0.07 −0.57 −0.12 −0.12 0.19 −0.29 −0.21 −0.12
Note. Each cell shows the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient(r) for the respective parameter pair. Significant correlations (p <  0.05) are shown in red bold; trends
(p <  0.1) are indicated in red italics. The enzymes and sexes of control or experimental groups, showing significant correlations with the physiological parameters,
are marked in red.
SEX SPECIFIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BRAIN METABOLISM AND NEUROSIGNALING 1017
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
physiological parameters, several prominent correla-
tions were identified in control females (Table  4).
In females, GS activity negatively correlated with the
HRV parameters associated with parasympathetic reg-
ulation, including SD (r =  −0.88), dX (r =  −0.84), and
RMSSD (r =  −0.62). Conversely, GS activity positively
correlated with SI (r =  0.70), indicative of enhanced
sympathetic influence. A trend toward a negative
correlation between GS activity and exploratory be-
havior (number of center entries) was also observed
(r =  −0.67, p =  0.07).
Thus, correlation analysis revealed clear sex-spe-
cific relationships between behavior, ECG parameters,
and cerebral cortex metabolism. In males, ME activi-
ty was strongly associated with autonomic regulation
and exploratory behavior, with higher ME activity
linked to parasympathetic predominance and coor-
dinated locomotor activity and rearing. In females,
the strongest associations with autonomic regulation
were observed for GS activity, which was related to
sympathetic predominance. Moreover, distinct cor-
relation patterns of exploratory behavior in females
compared with males suggested a greater emotional
component in female behavior.
Effect of PDC inhibitors on relationships be-
tween physiological and biochemical parameters
and their sexual dimorphism. Although PDC in-
hibitors did not significantly affect mean values of
metabolic, ECG, or behavioral parameters compared
with controls (Tables  1 and  2), they markedly reor-
ganized the relationships among the studied param-
eters, largely eliminating the pronounced sex-specific
patterns observed in control animals (Tables  3 and  4).
Specific changes depended on the inhibitor used,
likely reflecting differences in the pharmacokinetic
properties of AcPMe
2
and MeAcP, which influence in-
tramitochondrial inhibitor concentrations at the site
of PDC localization. Nevertheless, several common
trends were evident.
In both sexes, PDC inhibition did not funda-
mentally alter the antagonistic relationship between
parasympathetic (RR, SD, dX, RMSSD) and sympathet-
ic (SI) regulatory indices. However, the strength and
pattern of these associations changed, particularly for
individual parameters (Table  S1, Online Resource  1).
In both males and females, PDC inhibitors substan-
tially modified the correlation structure between
ECG and behavioral parameters in a sex-dependent
manner (Table  S1, Online Resource  1). For example,
following inhibitor administration, both males and
females lost characteristic strong correlations ob-
served in controls between parasympathetic activity
indices (SD, dX, RMSSD) and exploratory behavior,
including locomotion, rearing, and center entries.
The most prominent systemic effect of PDC in-
hibitors was the disappearance of strong correla-
tions that were characteristic of the control groups,
namely the correlations between ME activity and
ECG/behavioral parameters in males (Table  3) and
between GS activity and ECG parameters in females
(Table  4). This was accompanied by a reduction in
the dominance of individual biochemical parameters
within the correlation networks, resulting in diffuse
distributions of strong correlations across multiple
network components. In males, strong correlations
of behavioral and ECG parameters predominant-
ly with ME, but also with PDC and OGDC activities
were lost, while new associations involving PDC,
OGDC, GS, and IDH activities, emerged. As a result,
in males, PDC inhibitors shifted strong correlations
from the pyruvate metabolic node (Table  3) to the
glutamate metabolic node (Table  4). In females, the
opposite pattern was observed, with strong correla-
tions shifting from the glutamate metabolic node to
the pyruvate metabolic node. For example, the loss
of strong correlations between GS activity and ECG
parameters upon PDC inhibition was accompanied
by the emergence of strong correlations linking ECG
parameters with MDH and GDH activities, as well
as behavioral parameters with GS, GDH, MDH, and
ME activities. In addition, complete disappearance
of characteristic strong correlations between cortical
glutamate levels and enzymatic activities of pyru-
vate node was observed in females (Table  S1, Online
Resource  1).
Thus, in both sexes, administration of MeAcP
and AcPMe
2
altered correlation patterns linking be-
havioral and ECG parameters with markers of gluta-
mate metabolism (activities of OGDC, GS, GDH, IDH
and levels of glutamate), as well as with ME and
MDH activities that contribute to the PDC-dependent
generation of the TCA cycle substrate acetyl-CoA.
However, specific sets of affected correlations dif-
fered between sexes. In females, PDC inhibition
shifted the correlations to those with activities of
MDH, GDH, and ME, whereas in males – to the cor-
relations with activities of OGDC, IDH, and levels of
glutamate.
These findings suggest that PDC inhibition in-
duced a sex-specific reorganization of interactions
between metabolism and neurosignaling. In each
sex, the resulting network architecture incorporated
features that, under control conditions, were char-
acteristic of the opposite sex. Such reorganization
maintained homeostasis, as reflected by the min-
imal changes in the mean values of metabolic and
physiological parameters observed in both sexes
(Tables  1 and  2). At the same time, it reduced the
sex specificity of the correlation structure (Table S1
in the Online Resource  1) and altered sexual differ-
ences in physiological and biochemical parameters,
compared to the control groups (Tables  1  and  2).
GRAF et al.1018
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrates that correlation analysis
of relationships between physiological characteristics
and underlying molecular parameters (Tables  3 and  4;
Table  S1 in Online Resource  1) provides a more sen-
sitive indicator of organismal state than comparison
of parameter mean values (Tables  1 and  2). In con-
trol animals, sex differences in the coordination of
key metabolic and physiological indicators (Tables  3
and 4) reflect sex-specific homeostatic settings. As a
result, males and females can show similar mean val-
ues for most measured parameters (Tables  1 and  2).
Dysregulation of the key system of pyruvate me-
tabolism through the inhibition of PDC, which is a
central enzyme for oxidative metabolism of glucose,
the brain’s primary energy substrate, elicited a ho-
meostatic response aimed at stabilizing essential
metabolic parameters. Consequently, mean values of
biochemical and physiological parameters changed
only modestly in both sexes, with greater effects ob-
served in females, which were more responsive to
the inhibitors (Tables  1 and  2). However, there was a
substantial dynamic reorganization of the networks
linking cortical metabolism to behavioral and ECG
parameters (Tables  3 and  4; Table  S1 in Online Re-
source  1). These network-level changes largely abol-
ished the pronounced sexual dimorphism observed in
the correlation pattern of control animals (Tables  3
and  4; Table  S1 in Online Resource  1) and were ac-
companied by the emergence or attenuation of sex
differences in mean values of physiological and bio-
chemical parameters (Tables  1  and  2).
These findings suggest that the metabolic net-
works of males and females are tuned to maintain
comparable levels of key biochemical parameters, par-
ticularly glutamate content and activities of enzymes
involved in its metabolism. The tuning is sex-specific,
that is reflected in the different relationships linking
metabolism with neurosignaling to support similar
levels of key variables. During metabolic stress, com-
pensatory reorganization of these networks ensures
the maintenance of critical biochemical parameters.
Based on the indicators examined here, this homeo-
static objective appears to be achieved more effec-
tively in males than in females (Tables  1  and  2). Yet
the compensation altering the relationships between
metabolism and physiological parameters, results in
the emergence of sex differences in GDH activity,
cortical glutamate levels (Table  2), and freezing be-
havior (Table  1), while eliminating pre-existing sex
differences in locomotor activity (Table  1). Thus, the
maintenance of biochemical homeostasis during PDC
inhibition is achieved through the network-level reor-
ganization that modifies the pattern of sex differenc-
es characteristic of control animals.
Correlation analysis revealed sex-specific patterns
in both the native organization of networks linking
brain metabolic pathways with neurosignaling pro-
cesses and in the reorganization of these networks in
response to PDC inhibition. Although PDC inhibitors
were directed to the same metabolic node and affect-
ed glutamate metabolism in both males and females,
specific enzymes participating in adaptive responses
differed between sexes (Tables  3 and  4). These dif-
ferences likely reflect different baseline architecture
of interactions between metabolic and neurosignal-
ing pathways in male and female rats. In control fe-
males, neurosignaling surrogate parameters predomi-
nantly associated with GS activity, whereas in control
males, they were primarily associated with ME activ-
ity (Tables  3  and  4; Table  S1 in Online Resource  1).
The two compounds used for PDC inhibition pro-
duced qualitatively similar effects. However, quanti-
tative differences between AcPMe
2
and MeAcP likely
arise from their distinct pharmacokinetic properties.
For instance, AcPMe
2
, which serves as a precursor of
PDC inhibitors that are weaker than MeAcP (Fig.  1), may
nevertheless achieve higher intramitochondrial concen-
trations because of its greater membrane permeability.
The observed sex-dependent correlations of corti-
cal GS activity with biochemical and physiological pa-
rameters, as well as the involvement of GS-associated
networks in adaptation to PDC inhibition, are consis-
tent with findings from an independent study of sex
differences in human glioma metabolism involving
the GS-catalyzed reaction. Metabolic reprogramming
in malignant tumors is characterized by reduced PDC
activity and increased utilization of glutamine (GS re-
action product) as an alternative source for replen-
ishing TCA cycle intermediates. Notably, gliomas have
been shown to consume more glutamine in men than
in women  [37].
The close association between GS activity and
autonomic balance, reflected in ECG parameters and
observed specifically in females (Table  4), is consis-
tent with evidence demonstrating the influence of
sex hormones on GS. This enzyme plays a central
role in regulating glutamatergic neurotransmission
through astrocyte–neuron interactions involved in
synaptic glutamate turnover  [15,  17]. Estrogens have
been shown to modulate the activities of both GS  [13]
and GDH  [16], suggesting that sex-specific patterns of
association between GS activity and autonomic regu-
lation identified in our study (Tables  3  and  4) may be
mediated by estrogen-dependent regulation of gluta-
matergic tone  [14]. Previously, we also demonstrated
a relationship between changes in brain glutamate
levels and HRV parameters in female rats  [38].
In contrast, exploratory behavior and autonomic
balance in control males were more strongly associ-
ated with the activities of enzymes involved in the
SEX SPECIFIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BRAIN METABOLISM AND NEUROSIGNALING 1019
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
pyruvate metabolic node, including ME, PDC, and
OGDC (Tables  3  and  4). This pattern may reflect an
evolutionarily established emphasis on efficient ener-
gy production to support active behavioral responses.
Such a role is consistent with reports of sex-depen-
dent regulation of ME activity during ontogenesis  [19].
Moreover, adult male hearts exhibit higher expres-
sion of PDC-associated enzymes than female hearts
[39], while the expression of PDK4, a key regulator of
PDC activity in skeletal muscle, is influenced by both
estradiol levels and sex  [40]. Sexual dimorphism in
PDC regulation and related metabolic pathways may
also be linked to the location of gene encoding the
α-subunit of PDH on the X chromosome, which con-
tributes to more severe phenotypes resulting from
mutations affecting this subunit in males  [41].
Taken together, these findings indicate that, under
physiological conditions, males and females demon-
strate different interplay between metabolic and neu-
rosignaling processes, as reflected by surrogate ECG
and behavioral parameters. These baseline sex-specific
differences likely shape distinct trajectories of reorga-
nization of the metabolic–neurosignaling network un-
der metabolic stress. Although enzyme sets involved in
the response to PDC inhibition differed between sexes
(OGDC, GDH, ME, and MDH in females versus GS, OGDC,
and IDH in males), in both sexes, this reorganization
converged on pathways related to glutamate metabo-
lism. This observation is consistent with the fact that
reduced metabolic flux through the TCA cycle impairs
de  novo glutamate synthesis from glucose [5, 6, 42].
CONCLUSIONS
Correlation analysis of relationships between
cortical brain metabolism and behavioral and ECG
parameters used here as surrogate markers of neu-
rosignaling processes, revealed pronounced sexual di-
morphism. Both under physiological conditions and
upon PDC inhibition by pyruvate analogs, the archi-
tecture of associations between metabolic and neu-
rosignaling parameters differed substantially between
males and females. In control females, the primary
relationships between physiological parameters were
associated with GS, which is critical for the astrocyte–
neuron coupling necessary for the neurotransmitter
action of glutamate during glutamatergic activation.
In contrast, control males exhibited dominant asso-
ciations of physiological parameters with the activ-
ities of ME, PDC, and OGDC, the enzymes involved
in the pyruvate metabolism sustaining the amphibol-
ic role of TCA cycle in both energy production and
biosynthesis. In both sexes, PDC inhibition induced a
marked reorganization of the relationships between
behavioral/autonomic regulation and activities of en-
zymes involved in glutamate metabolism. However,
specific metabolic nodes affected by this reorganiza-
tion were sex-dependent. Established differences be-
tween males and females in the organization of phys-
iological–metabolic interaction networks highlight
the need for sex-specific, personalized approaches to
brain pathologies associated with acquired or geneti-
cally determined PDC dysfunction.
Abbreviations
AcP acetylphosphonate
AcPMe methyl acetylphosphonate
AcPMe
2
dimethyl acetylphosphonate
GDH glutamate dehydrogenase
GS glutamine synthetase
IDH isocitrate dehydrogenase
MDH malate dehydrogenase
ME malic enzyme (decarboxylating malate
dehydrogenase)
MeAcP methyl acetylphosphinate
OGDC 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex
PDC pyruvate dehydrogenase complex
PDH pyruvate dehydrogenase
RR intervals average cardiointerval duration
dX range of RR interval values
RMSSD root mean square of successive
differences of RR intervals
SI stress index
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material
available at https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297926600444.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank undergraduate and graduate stu-
dents of the Metabolic Engineering Group under su-
pervision of V.  I.  Bunik for their technical assistance
in sample preparation and enzymatic assays during
their association with the group.
Contributions
A.V.G. conducted experiments, analyzed results, wrote
and edited the article text; A.V.K. synthesized and con-
trolled the quality of pyruvate analogs, edited the ar-
ticle text; V.I.B. developed the concept, designed the
experiments, supervised the study, analyzed results,
wrote and edited the article.
Funding
This study was conducted under the state assign-
ments of Lomonosov Moscow State University NN
119042590056-2, 121012290046-4, and 121032300071-8.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal procedures were conducted in accor-
dance with EU Directives 86/609/EEC and 2010/63/EU
GRAF et al.1020
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
and were approved by the Bioethics Committee of
the Lomonosov Moscow State University (protocol
no. 137-d; November 11, 2022).
Conflict of interest
The authors of this work declare that they have no
conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Patel, M. S., Nemeria, N. S., Furey, W., and Jordan, F. (2014) The pyruvate dehydrogenase complexes: struc-
ture-based function and regulation, J. Biol. Chem., 289, 16615-16623, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R114.563148.
2. Bunik, V. I. (2024) A challenging interplay between basic research, technologies and medical education
to provide therapies based on disease mechanisms, Front. Med. (Lausanne), 11, 1464672, https://doi.org/
10.3389/fmed.2024.1464672.
3. DeBrosse, S. D., Okajima, K., Zhang, S., Nakouzi, G., Schmotzer, C. L., Lusk-Kopp, M., Frohnapfel, M. B.,
Grahame, G., and Kerr, D. S. (2012) Spectrum of neurological and survival outcomes in pyruvate dehydrogenase
complex (PDC) deficiency: lack of correlation with genotype, Mol. Genet. Metab., 107, 394-402, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.09.001.
4. Bubber, P., Haroutunian, V., Fisch, G., Blass, J. P., and Gibson, G. E. (2005) Mitochondrial abnormalities in
Alzheimer brain: mechanistic implications, Ann. Neurol., 57, 695-703, https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20474.
5. Santos, S. S., Gibson, G. E., Cooper, A. J. L., Denton, T. T., Thompson, C. M., Bunik, V. I., Alves, P. M., and
Sonnewald, U. (2006) Inhibitors of the α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex alter [1-13C]glucose and [U-13C]
glutamate metabolism in cerebellar granule neurons, J. Neurosci. Res., 83, 450-458, https://doi.org/10.1002/
jnr.20749.
6. Artiukhov, A.V., Aleshin, V.A., Karlina, I.S., Kazantsev, A.V., Sibiryakina, D.A., Ksenofontov, A.L., Lukashev,N.V.,
Graf, A. V., and Bunik, V. I. (2022) Phosphonate inhibitors of pyruvate dehydrogenase perturb homeosta-
sis of amino acids and protein succinylation in the brain, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 13186, https://doi.org/10.3390/
ijms232113186.
7. Gul-Hinc, S., Jankowska-Kulawy, A., and Szutowicz, A. (2026) Cholinergic phenotypes of acetyl-CoA with
ATP-citrate lyase link, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 27, 782, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020782.
8. Nemeria, N. S., Korotchkina, L. G., Chakraborty, S., Patel, M. S., and Jordan, F. (2006) Acetylphosphinate is the
most potent mechanism-based substrate-like inhibitor of both the human and Escherichia coli pyruvate de-
hydrogenase components of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, Bioorg. Chem., 34, 362-379, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.bioorg.2006.09.001.
9. Bunik, V.I., Artiukhov,A., Kazantsev,A., Goncalves, R., Daloso,D., Oppermann,H., Kulakovskaya, E., Lukashev, N.,
Fernie, A., Brand, M., and Gaunitz, F. (2015) Specific inhibition by synthetic analogs of pyruvate reveals that the
pyruvate dehydrogenase reaction is essential for metabolism and viability of glioblastoma cells, Oncotarget, 6,
40036-40052, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5486.
10. Aleshin, V. A., Sibiryakina, D. A., Kazantsev, A. V., Graf, A. V., and Bunik, V. I. (2023) Acylation of the rat brain
proteins is affected by the inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase in vivo, Biochemistry (Moscow), 88, 105-118,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297923010091.
11. Duarte, J. M. N., Do, K. Q., and Gruetter, R. (2014) Longitudinal neurochemical modifications in the aging
mouse brain measured in vivo by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Neurobiol. Aging, 35, 1660-1668, https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.01.135.
12. Mkrtchyan, G. V., Graf, A., Trofimova, L., Ksenofontov, A., Baratova, L., and Bunik, V. (2018) Positive correla-
tion between rat brain glutamate concentrations and mitochondrial 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase activity,
Anal. Biochem., 552, 100-109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2018.01.003.
13. Haghighat, N. (2005) Estrogen (17β-estradiol) enhances glutamine synthetase activity in C6-glioma cells, Neuro-
chem. Res., 30, 661-667, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-005-2754-5.
14. Goyette, M. J., Murray, S. L., Saldanha, C. J., and Holton, K. (2023) Sex hormones, neurosteroids, and glutama-
tergic neurotransmission: a review of the literature, Neuroendocrinology, 113, 905-914, https://doi.org/10.1159/
000531148.
15. Al-Suwailem, E., Abdi, S., and El-Ansary,A. (2018) Sex differences in the glutamate signaling pathway in juvenile
rats, J. Neurosci. Res., 96, 459-466, https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24144.
16. Bunik, V., Aleshin, V., Artiukhov, A., Kaehne, T., and Karlina, I. (2016) Multiple forms of glutamate dehydroge-
nase in animals: structural determinants and physiological implications, Biology (Basel), 5, 53, https://doi.org/
10.3390/biology5040053.
17. Chiang, V. S.-C., and Park, J. H. (2020) Glutamate in male and female sexual behavior: receptors, transporters,
and steroid independence, Front. Behav. Neurosci., 14, 589882, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.589882.
SEX SPECIFIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BRAIN METABOLISM AND NEUROSIGNALING 1021
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
18. Klinge, C. M. (2020) Estrogenic control of mitochondrial function, Redox Biol., 31, 101435, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.redox.2020.101435.
19. Sasse, D., and Hoffmann, H. (1982) Postnatal differentiation of sex-specific distribution patterns of G6Pase, G6P-
DH and ME in the rat liver, Histochemistry, 75, 31-42, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00492531.
20. Viel, C., Brandtner, A., Weißhaar, A., Lehto, A., Fuchs, M., and Klein, J. (2021) Effects of magnesium orotate,
benfotiamine and a combination of vitamins on mitochondrial and cholinergic function in the TgF344-AD rat
model of Alzheimers disease, Pharmaceuticals, 14, 1218, https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14121218.
21. Saed, C. T., Tabatabaei Dakhili, S. A., and Ussher, J. R. (2021) Pyruvate dehydrogenase as a therapeutic target for
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci., 4, 582-588, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.0c00208.
22. Lewis, A. J., Neubauer, S., Tyler, D. J., and Rider, O. J. (2016) Pyruvate dehydrogenase as a therapeutic tar-
get for obesity cardiomyopathy, Expert Opin. Ther. Targets, 20, 755-766, https://doi.org/10.1517/14728222.
2016.1126248.
23. Artiukhov, A. V., Balashova, N. V., Ikonnikova, A. Y., Kazantsev, A. V., Semashko, T. A., Ksenofontov, A. L.,
Graf, A. V., and Bunik, V. I. (2024) Pharmacological doses of thiamine benefit patients with the Charcot–
Marie–Tooth neuropathy by changing thiamine diphosphate levels and affecting regulation of thiamine-depen-
dent enzymes, Biochemistry (Moscow), 89, 1161-1182, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297924070023.
24. Hadano, T., Ishibashi, S., Matsuoka, H., Koyama, K., Kuwabara, S., and Yamamoto, T. (2025) Association of sex
difference with thiamine responsive disorders in internal medicine: a pilot case-control study, J. Clin. Med. Res.,
17, 490-498, https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr6054.
25. Artiukhov, A. V. (2022) Development of Methods for Targeted Regulation of 2-oxo acid Dehydrogenases in
Mammals and Features of Such Regulation in Cells with Different Metabolic Types, PhD Thesis in Chemistry,
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow.
26. Artiukhov, A. V., Graf, A. V., Kazantsev, A. V., Boyko, A. I., Aleshin, V. A., Ksenofontov, A. L., and Bunik, V. I.
(2022) Increasing inhibition of the rat brain 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase decreases glutathione redox
state, elevating anxiety and perturbing stress adaptation, Pharmaceuticals, 15, 182, https://doi.org/10.3390/
ph15020182.
27. Artiukhov, A. V., Kazantsev, A. V., Boyko, A. I., Aleshin, V. A., Ksenofontov, A. L., and Bunik, V. I. (2021) Selective
inhibition of 2-oxoglutarate and 2-oxoadipate dehydrogenases by the phosphonate analogs of their 2-oxo acid
substrates, Front. Chem., 8, 18907, https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.618907.
28. McBride, K. (2003) Does intranasal application of zinc sulfate produce anosmia in the mouse? An olfactometric
and anatomical study, Chem. Senses, 28, 659-670, https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjg058.
29. Slotnick, B., Glover, P., and Bodyak, N. (2000) Does intranasal application of zinc sulfate produce anosmia in
the rat? Behav. Neurosci., 114, 814-829, https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.114.4.814.
30. Graf, A. V., Maslova, M. V., Artiukhov, A. V., Ksenofontov, A. L., Aleshin, V. A., and Bunik, V. I. (2022) Acute
prenatal hypoxia in rats affects physiology and brain metabolism in the offspring, dependent on sex and ges-
tational age, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 2579, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052579.
31. Araújo, W. L., Trofimova, L., Mkrtchyan, G., Steinhauser, D., Krall, L., Graf, A., Fernie, A. R., and Bunik, V. I.
(2013) On the role of the mitochondrial 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex in amino acid metabolism,
Amino Acids, 44, 683-700, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-012-1392-x.
32. Artiukhov, A. V., Grabarska, A., Gumbarewicz, E., Kaca, W., and Bunik, V. I. (2020) Synthetic analogues of 2-oxo
acids discriminate metabolic contribution of the 2-oxoglutarate and 2-oxoadipate dehydrogenases in mammalian
cells and tissues, Sci. Rep., 10, 1886, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58803-z.
33. Bunik, V., Artiukhov, A., Aleshin, V., and Mkrtchyan, G. (2010) Behavioral impact of the regulation of the
brain 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex by synthetic phosphonate analog of 2-oxoglutarate: implications
into the role of the complex in neurodegenerative diseases, Parkinsons Dis., 2010, 749061, https://doi.org/
10.4061/2010/749061.
34. Borovskaya, R., Krivoguz, D., Chernyi, S., Kozhurin, E., and Goryachkin, S. (2022) Surface water salinity eval-
uation and identification for using remote sensing data and machine learning approach, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10,
257, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020257.
35. Sullivan, G. M., and Feinn, R. (2012) Using effect size – or why the p value is not enough, J. Grad. Med. Educ.,
4, 279-282, https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1.
36. Estanislau, C., Díaz-Morán, S., Cañete, T., Blázquez, G., Tobeña, A., Fernández-Teruel, A., and Escorihuela, R. M.
(2013) Context-dependent differences in grooming behavior among the NIH heterogeneous stock and the Roman
high- and low-avoidance rats, Neurosci. Res., 77, 187-201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2013.09.007.
37. Sponagel, J., Jones, J. K., Frankfater, C., Zhang, S., Tung, O., Cho, K., Tinkum, K. L., Gass, H., Nunez, E.,
Spitz, D. R., Chinnaiyan, P., Schaefer, J., Patti, G. J., Graham, M. S., Mauguen, A., Grkovski, M., Dunphy, M. P.,
GRAF et al.1022
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Krebs, S., Luo, J., Rubin, J. B., and Ippolito, J. E. (2022) Sex differences in brain tumor glutamine metab-
olism reveal sex-specific vulnerabilities to treatment, Med, 3, 792-811.e12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.
2022.08.005.
38. Graf, A., Trofimova, L., Loshinskaja, A., Mkrtchyan, G., Strokina, A., Lovat, M., Tylicky, A., Strumilo, S.,
Bettendorff, L., and Bunik, V. I. (2013) Up-regulation of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase as a stress response,
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 45, 175-189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2012.07.002.
39. Vijay, V., Han, T., Moland, C. L., Kwekel, J. C., Fuscoe, J. C., and Desai, V. G. (2015) Sexual dimorphism in
the expression of mitochondria-related genes in rat heart at different ages, PLoS One, 10, e0117047, https://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117047.
40. Christianto, A., Baba, T., Takahashi, F., Inui, K., Inoue, M., Suyama, M., Ono, Y., Ohkawa, Y., and Morohashi, K.
(2021) Sex differences in metabolic pathways are regulated by Pfkfb3 and Pdk4 expression in rodent muscle,
Commun. Biol., 4, 1264, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02790-y.
41. Dahl, H. H. (1995) Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha deficiency: males and females differ yet again, Am. J. Hum.
Genet., 56, 553-557.
42. Bunik, V. I., Artiukhov, A. V., Kazantsev, A. V., Aleshin, V. A., Boyko, A. I., Ksenofontov, A. L., and Lukashev, N. V.
(2022) Administration of phosphonate inhibitors of dehydrogenases of 2-oxoglutarate and 2-oxoadipate to
rats elicits target-specific metabolic and physiological responses, Front. Chem., 10, 968903, https://doi.org/
10.3389/fchem.2022.968903.
Publishers Note. Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affiliations. AI tools may have been used in the translation or editing of this article.