ISSN 0006-2979, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2026, Vol. 91, No. 6, pp. 1034-1049 © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2026.
1034
Environmental Enrichment May Mitigate
Dexamethasone-Induced Changes
in the Glycemic Curve
Ludmila P. Filaretova
1,a
*, Olga Yu. Morozova
1
, Polina V. Punina
1
,
Olga P. Komkova
1
, Tatiana T. Podvigina
1
, and Natalia I. Yarushkina
1
1
I. P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences,
199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
a
e-mail: filaretovalp@infran.ru
Received March 30, 2026
Revised June 15, 2026
Accepted June 15, 2026
AbstractPreviously, we demonstrated that administration of dexamethasone (Dex) at a dose of 1  mg/kg,
24  h before an ulcerogenic stimulus exerts a pro-ulcerogenic effect, accompanied by disturbances in car-
bohydrate metabolism. In the present study, we examined the influence of housing conditions – standard
conditions  (SC), social isolation  (SI), and environmental enrichment  (EE) conditions – on the Dex-induced
changes in carbohydrate metabolism, as well as on hematological parameters. Experiments were conducted
with male rats during the winter period. Starting from the age of 30 days, the animals were housed for
6  weeks under SC, SI, or EE conditions. Dex (1  mg/kg, intraperitoneal) or its vehicle (control) was admin-
istered 24  h prior to the glucose tolerance test (GTT), after which food was removed. Following the GTT,
indomethacin (IM) was administered at an ulcerogenic dose; 4  h later, the rats were decapitated, and blood
samples were collected to assess corticosterone levels and hematological parameters, including calculation of
the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Alongside the IM administration experiment, a control experiment
including vehicle administration was performed according to the same protocol, in which the vehicle of
IM was administered instead of IM itself. Administration of glucose during the GTT led to the increase in
the blood glucose levels, reaching maximum (peak) at 30 min in all control, previously fasted animals (SC,
SI, EE groups). Beginning at 60  min, the glucose levels gradually declined in all control groups, returning
to the baseline only in the control rats from the EE  group. In the rats maintained under SC conditions,
pretreatment with Dex resulted in the reduction in the peak of the glycemic curve, accompanied by the
corresponding decrease in the area under the curve (AUC) and reduced rate of decline in the blood glu-
cose levels compared with the respective control group. In the rats housed under EE condition, resistance
to the effects of Dex was observed, as evidenced by the absence of changes in the glycemic curve peak,
AUC, or rate of decline in the blood glucose levels relative to the corresponding control group. The control
rats from the SI group exhibited lower values of the glycemic curve peak, AUC, and rate of decline in
the blood glucose levels than the rats from the SC and EE groups. Administration of Dex did not produce
any further changes in these parameters. Dex administration induced a marked increase in the NLR in all
groups (SC, SI, and EE), both in the rats treated with IM and in the animals receiving its vehicle. Taken
together, these findings indicate that a single administration of Dex (1  mg/kg; 24  h after injection) to the rats
from the SC group could alter glycemic response and increase NLR. Housing under EE conditions prevents
the Dex-induced changes in the glycemic curve.
DOI: 10.1134/S0006297926601000
Keywords: dexamethasone, pro-ulcerogenic effect, glucose tolerance, glucose tolerance test, glycemic curve,
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, environmental enrichment, social isolation, rats
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT, DEXAMETHASONE, AND GLYCEMIC CURVE 1035
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
INTRODUCTION
Contribution of the interaction between the
neural signals and metabolic pathways to the brain
functioning cannot be limited to consideration of this
interaction at the brain level alone. The whole-organ-
ism level, which is the focus of integrative physiolo-
gy  [1-3], is necessary for this. A review of the recent
publications indicates a renewed interest among the
researchers in the problem of brain–body interac-
tion  [4-7], which is now considered broader than the
brain–gut axis interaction, which was first brilliantly
demonstrated by I.  P.  Pavlov  [8,  9]. Nevertheless, the
study of the brain–gastrointestinal tract (brain–GI)
axis, with its bidirectional interaction between the
brain and the GI tract as a multicomponent system
including neural, hormonal, metabolic, and immune
pathways, remains one of the most intensively devel-
oping areas [10-14].
Glucocorticoid hormones, which are produced in
the final link of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adreno-
cortical system (HPA axis, a key hormonal stress sys-
tem [15,  16] and hormonal component of the brain–
GI axis  [17]) represent one of the important factors
in the regulation of glucose homeostasis, the main
energy source for the brain. Temporary increase in
the blood glucose levels is important for ensuring
maximum brain activity. This is achieved through
stimulating effect of the hormones on gluconeogen-
esis, inhibitory effect on the glucose uptake and uti-
lization in skeletal muscles and white adipose tissue,
tissue-specific effect on the glycogen metabolism, and
modulating effect on the secretion of insulin and glu-
cagon from the pancreas [16, 18-20].
Our interest in the issue of the influence of glu-
cocorticoid hormones on carbohydrate metabolism is
related to elucidation of the mechanisms of the gas-
troprotective effect of glucocorticoid hormones pro-
duced during stress, which has been discovered in
our previous studies [21-24]. This allowed us to revise
the traditional view of these hormones as ulcerogenic
factors and of the HPA axis as an ulcerogenic com-
ponent of the brain–GI axis. According to our results,
acute stress-induced activation of the HPA axis is a
gastroprotective component of the brain–GI axis  [17,
25,  26]. Under certain conditions, a gastroprotective
effect was also demonstrated in our studies for the
exogenous glucocorticoid hormones  [27,  28], which
indicates the possibility of their dual effects: phys-
iological gastroprotective effect identified in our
studies and the known pathological pro-ulcerogenic
effect.
To study the mechanisms of transformation of
the physiological gastroprotective action of gluco-
corticoid hormones into pathological pro-ulcerogenic
consequences, we developed experimental models in
rats using these hormones, including dexamethasone
(Dex), in which we observed such transformation
[27,  28]. The dexamethasone model demonstrates
that a single administration of Dex at the same dose
of 1  mg/kg could lead to both gastroprotective and
pro-ulcerogenic effects, depending on the duration of
the hormone’s action. When the hormone was admin-
istered 1-3  h before an ulcerogenic stimulus, a gastro-
protective effect was observed; the effect was absent
when the hormone was administered 12  h before an
ulcerogenic stimulus; administration of the hormone
24  h before the stimulus resulted in the early mani-
festation of a pro-ulcerogenic effect. In studying the
mechanisms, we showed that the Dex-induced short-
term support of the blood glucose levels in the fasted
rats contributes to its gastroprotective effect, but the
prolonged maintenance of blood glucose levels leads
to disorders of carbohydrate metabolism, including
development of insulin resistance, which, togeth-
er with the Dex-induced inhibition of the HPA axis,
contributes to realization of the pro-ulcerogenic effect
of Dex.
The present study was aimed at further investi-
gation of the mechanisms of pro-ulcerogenic action
of Dex associated with the disorders of carbohydrate
metabolism and searching for approaches to reduce
magnitude of these disorders. In addition to the dis-
orders of carbohydrate metabolism, therapy with
glucocorticoid hormones could lead to the changes
in the leukocyte composition of blood: neutrophilia
and lymphopenia with corresponding increase in the
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)  [29-32], increase
in which has also been shown in hyperglycemia  [33].
In connection with these effects and our interest in
an integrative approach, in our experimental model,
we studied the effect of Dex on the leukocyte com-
position of blood.
The available literature data  [34-37] and the re-
sults of our previous studies  [38,  39] indicate pre-
ventive potential of the environmental enrichment
against the development of various pathological dis-
orders. Environmental enrichment, which combines
increased physical activity, cognitive and sensory
stimulation, and social interaction, is considered an
effective non-drug strategy [37, 38, 40]. This served
as the basis for us to test whether the environmental
enrichment could be considered as an approach to
reduce the Dex-induced changes in carbohydrate me-
tabolism, as well as possible changes in the leukocyte
composition of blood, which characterizes immune
properties of the organism. Social isolation (a hous-
ing condition opposite to environmental enrichment)
which often leads to exacerbation of the pathological
changes in the body  [38,  39], was of interest to us as
a comparison with the influence of environmental
enrichment.
FILARETOVA et al.1036
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
The objective of this work was to study prolonged
(24  h) action of Dex, which exerts a pro-ulcerogenic
effect on the stomach, on the glucose tolerance, as
well as on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and
dependence of the identified effects of Dex on the
housing conditions of rats: standard conditions, social
isolation, and environmental enrichment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animal housing conditions. Experiments were
conducted with male Sprague-Dawley rats from the
Shared Research Facility “Biocollection of the IP RAS”
(Koltushi, Leningrad Region) during the winter sea-
son. Animals were kept in the laboratory vivarium
at a temperature of 21-22°C and a 12  h  :  12  h light/
dark regime (lights on at 8:00, off at 20:00). Rat pups
at 30  days of age (weight 90  ±  1.2  g, n =  144) were
immediately after weaning randomly distributed into
groups with different housing conditions: standard
conditions  (SC), social isolation  (SI), or environmental
enrichment  (EE).
SI conditions involved housing of animals in-
dividually in standard opaque plastic rat cages
(54×38×20  cm) without physical or visual contact
with other rats. In EE conditions, rats were housed in
groups of 6 in large wire cages (100×50×80  cm) with
various “enriching” accessories: a running wheel, hid-
ing houses, shelves, ladders, tubes, hammocks, water
baths, and toys. The set of accessories was changed
three times a week, except for the running wheel,
which was constantly available. Control for the SI and
EE groups were rats housed in standard opaque plas-
tic cages (54×38×20  cm) in groups of 6 (SC). Rats were
housed under SC, SI, and EE conditions for 6  weeks.
Throughout this period, body weight of the rats was
assessed weekly, which in all groups increased uni-
formly and reached on average 355  ±  3.5  g (n =  144)
after 6  weeks, with no differences found between the
groups (SC, SI, and EE).
Experimental design. After 6  weeks of housing
animals under SC, SI, and EE conditions (Fig.  1), on
the first day of the experiment (Day  1), half of the
rats in each group were administered Dex (1  mg/kg,
intraperitoneal, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), and the
other half were administered its vehicle (propylene
glycol, 1  mL/kg body weight, Vecton, Russia) (Table  1).
Immediately after injection, food was removed for
24  h (fasting). On the next day (Day  2), 24  h after
administration of Dex or its vehicle (control) and
start of fasting, a glucose tolerance test (GTT) was
performed. After completion of the GTT, rats in each
group (which remained fasted) were administered
indomethacin at an ulcerogenic dose (IM, 35  mg/kg,
subcutaneously, GLPBIO, Korea). According to the
same protocol (Fig.  1), a separate control experiment
was conducted in which, instead of IM, its vehicle
(physiological saline, 5  mL/kg body weight with addi-
tion of a drop of Tween  80, Rosmedbio, Russia) was
administered. Four hours after the injection of IM or
its vehicle, the rats were decapitated. After decapita-
tion, thymus was extracted to assess its relative mass,
and blood was collected from the trunk vessels to as-
sess corticosterone levels, blood glucose levels, and
hematological parameters.
Glucose tolerance assessment: GTT. To assess
glucose tolerance in the GTT, blood glucose levels
were determined in the previously fasted (24  h) rats
before glucose administration (0  point, baseline level)
and after glucose administration (2  g/kg, intraperito-
neal) at 30, 60, 120, and 180  min (Fig.  1). Blood glu-
cose levels were measured using test strips and a
glucometer (Accu-Chek Performa, Germany) in a drop
of blood taken from the tail vein (after incision) at
the tip of the tail. Based on the test results, glycemic
Fig.  1. Experimental design. Rat pups at 30 days of age were placed for 6  weeks in different housing conditions: standard
conditions (SC), social isolation (SI), or environmental enrichment (EE) conditions. After 6  weeks, rats in each group were
administered dexamethasone (Dex) or its vehicle, and food was immediately removed for 24  h (Day  1). On the next day
(Day  2), 24  h after administration of Dex or its vehicle and start of fasting, a glucose tolerance test (GTT) was performed.
Immediately after completion of the GTT, rats in each group were administered indomethacin (IM) at an ulcerogenic dose.
Four hours after injection, the animals were decapitated. A  control experiment was conducted according to the same pro-
tocol, in which the vehicle of IM was administered instead of  IM.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT, DEXAMETHASONE, AND GLYCEMIC CURVE 1037
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Table 1. Drug administration protocol and number of
rats in groups
Housing
conditions
Group Drugs
SC,
n = 46
1 Dex + IM,
n = 11
2 Vehicle of Dex + IM,
n = 11
3 Dex + Vehicle of IM,
n = 12
4 Vehicle of Dex + Vehicle of IM,
n = 12
SI,
n = 48
1 Dex + IM,
n = 12
2 Vehicle of Dex + IM,
n = 12
3 Dex + Vehicle of IM,
n = 12
4 Vehicle of Dex + Vehicle of IM,
n = 12
EE,
n = 48
1 Dex + IM,
n = 12
2 Vehicle of Dex + IM,
n = 12
3 Dex + Vehicle of IM,
n = 12
4 Vehicle of Dex + Vehicle of IM,
n = 12
Note. SC – standard conditions; SI– social isolation; EE– en-
vironmental enrichment; Dex – dexamethasone; IM – indo-
methacin; n – number of rats in the group. Groups of rats
that received the vehicle of IM (control experiment) are
marked in bold.
curves were plotted. In addition to the dynamics of
blood glucose levels and maximum increase in the
blood glucose levels (glycemic curve peak) after glu-
cose load, the rate of decline in blood glucose lev-
els and incremental area under the glycemic curve
(iAUC) were evaluated. iAUC was calculated using
the trapezoidal method [41, 42] with the formula:
((C1
+ C2)/2 −Cbas) × (T2 −T1), where Cbas is blood
glucose content at 0 time (baseline level); C1, C2 are
the blood glucose content at adjacent time points
T1 and T2, respectively. Calculation of the rate of
decline in blood glucose levels was performed in
the interval from 30 to 180  min using the formula:
(C180  −  C30)/(T180  −  T30), where C30 and C180 are
the blood glucose content at 30 and 180  min, respec-
tively; T180 and T30 are time points after glucose
administration.
Hematological parameters and corticosterone
content in blood. Blood analysis was performed
using an automated hematology analyzer BC-30 Vet
(Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd,
China), which includes determination of qualitative
and quantitative composition of blood. Blood was
collected in EDTA K3 tubes to prevent clotting. Be-
fore measurement, the blood was diluted with a sol-
vent for measuring small-volume samples. In this
study, we were interested in leukocyte composition
parameters of the blood, which characterize immune
properties of the organism: granulocytes (neutrophils)
and lymphocytes, were analyzed. Based on the ob-
tained data, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
was calculated: total number of granulocytes (neutro-
phils)/total number of lymphocytes.
Corticosterone levels in blood plasma were de-
termined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent as-
say (ELISA) using a “Rat/Mouse Corticosterone ELISA
Kit” (HEMA, Russia) with a Star Fax 2100 analyzer
(Awareness Technology, Inc., USA).
Statistical analysis. Data are presented as a
mean  ±  standard error of the mean (SEM). The re-
search results were analyzed using MedCalc Ver-
sion 12.2.1.0. (Statistics for Biomedical Research,
MedCalc Software, Belgium). All obtained data were
tested for normality (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test).
The Levene’s test was used to assess equality of vari-
ances. Based on the test results, to assess differences
between time points belonging to the same glycemic
curve, the non-parametric Friedman test was used for
comparing repeated measurements. To assess differ-
ences between two glycemic curves at a given time
point, the Mann–Whitney U  test for two independent
groups was used. In other cases, to assess differences
between the groups, the Kruskal–Wallis test with sub-
sequent post  hoc test was applied. Outliers (extreme
values far beyond the sample) were identified and
excluded based on the results of three tests: Grubbs
test, Generalized ESD test, Tukey test. Differences
between the groups were considered significant at
p <  0.05.
RESULTS
Effect of a single administration of Dex on glu-
cose metabolism parameters in the GTT in rats de-
pending on their housing conditions. In the control
rats (with Dex vehicle injected), housed under SC, SI,
and EE conditions, blood glucose levels before the glu-
cose load (baseline level, 0 point), after fasting (24 h),
FILARETOVA et al.1038
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
did not differ between each other and were
4.7  ±  0.09  mmol/L (n =  11); 4.8  ±  0.16 mmol/L (n =  12);
4.8  ±  0.06  mmol/L (n =  12), respectively. In all control
groups, administration of glucose led to the increase
in the blood glucose levels, which was maximal at
30  min (glycemic curve peak) (Fig.  2,  a-c), with the
peak of the glycemic curve in the rats from the SI
group being lower (p <  0.05) compared to the peaks
in the rats from the SC and EE groups, which did
not differ from each other (Fig.  2d). After reaching
the peak, the blood glucose levels in all groups (SC,
SI, EE) gradually decreased: glucose levels at 60  min
were significantly lower (p <  0.05) compared to the
levels at 30  min, but higher (p <  0.05) compared to
the levels at 180  min (Fig.  2,  a-c). However, the rate of
decline in the blood glucose levels differed between
the groups: in the rats from EE group, the rate of
decline in blood glucose levels in the interval from 30
to 180min was higher (p <  0.05) compared to the rats
from the SI group (Fig.  2e). It should be emphasized
that only in the rats housed under EE conditions
did the blood glucose level after glucose load fully
recover, as evidenced by the absence of differences
between the blood glucose levels at 180  min and the
baseline level at 0 point (Fig.  2c).
Administration of Dex 24  h prior to the GTT, on
the background of fasting, itself (i.e., in the absence
of other exposures) caused increase in the blood
glucose levels (0  point, baseline level) in all groups
(Fig.  2,  a-c), with no significant differences found be-
tween the Dex-induced baseline blood glucose levels
in the rats housed under SC, SI, and EE conditions.
In all groups, the peak of the glycemic curve after
Dex administration, as well as after administration of
its vehicle, was observed at 30  min, but its magnitude
varied. In the rats housed under SC conditions, reduc-
tion in the peak of the glycemic curve was observed
compared to the peak in the control rats receiving
the Dex vehicle. At the same time, Dex had no ef-
fect on the magnitude of the peaks of the glycemic
curves in the rats from the EE and SI groups, which
did not differ from the corresponding values in the
control rats injected with the Dex vehicle (Fig.  2,a-d).
The magnitude of the glycemic curve peak in the EE
group after Dex administration was higher (p <  0.05)
compared to that in the SC group (Fig.  2d), while the
peak values in the SI and SC groups did not differ.
Dex administration affected not only magnitude
of the glycemic curve peaks but also the rate of de-
cline in the blood glucose levels (Fig.  2e). In the SI
and EE groups, the rate of decline in the blood glu-
cose levels was higher compared to that in the SC
group: in the SI and EE groups, decrease (p <  0.05) in
the glucose levels compared to 30  min was observed
starting from 60  min (Fig.  2, b and c), whereas in the
rats from the SC group, the glucose level at 60  min
still did not differ from the level at 30  min, and only
at 120  min did the glucose level in this group became
lower (p <  0.05) compared to 30 and 60  min (Fig.  2a).
Dex administration significantly reduced the rate of
decline in the blood glucose levels in the interval
from 30 to 180  min in the rats from the SC group but
did not change the rate of decline in the rats from
the SI and EE groups compared to the corresponding
values in the control animals (Fig.  2e). After Dex ad-
ministration, the rate of decline in the blood glucose
levels in the EE group (p <  0.05) remained higher
compared to the SC and SI groups (Fig.  2e) and did
not change compared to the corresponding value in
the control rats.
Although the blood glucose levels in all groups
(SC, SI, and EE) gradually decreased after the glu-
cose load, the Dex-induced glucose levels at 120 and
180  min remained elevated compared to the corre-
sponding values in the control rats injected with the
Dex vehicle (Fig.  2,  a-c).
Comparison of the areas under the glycemic
curves (iAUC) (Fig.  2e) revealed a smaller area under
the curve in the control rats (injected with Dex ve-
hicle) from the SI group compared to the areas in
the curves from the rats from the SC and EE groups,
which did not differ from each other. Dex adminis-
tration led to the significant reduction in the area
under the curve in the rats from SC group but had
no effect on the corresponding curve parameter from
the rats from the SI and EE groups. The area under
the curve from the rats from the EE group was sig-
nificantly higher than that from the rats from the SC
group, both after administration of Dex and its vehi-
cle (Fig.  2e).
Thus, comparison of the glycemic curves revealed
differences between the SC, SI, and EE groups. The
control rats (injected with Dex vehicle) from the SI
group differed from the rats in the SC and EE groups
in having lower values of the glycemic curve peak,
rate of decline in the blood glucose levels, and area
under the curve. At the same time, Dex administra-
tion did not lead to further changes in these values.
Dex administration led to the significant changes in
the glycemic curve (reduction in the glycemic curve
peak, rate of decline in blood glucose levels, and area
under the curve) in the rats from the SC group com-
pared to the corresponding values in the control rats
(injected with Dex vehicle). In the rats housed un-
der EE conditions, full recovery of the blood glucose
levels after glucose load was observed in the control
rats (injected with Dex vehicle) as well as resistance
to the action of Dex: absence of changes in the gly-
cemic curve peak, rate of decline in the blood glu-
cose levels, and area under the curve compared to
the corresponding values in the control rats (injected
with Dex vehicle).
ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT, DEXAMETHASONE, AND GLYCEMIC CURVE 1039
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Fig.  2. Effect of a single administration of dexamethasone (Dex, 1  mg/kg, 24  h before testing in combination with 24-h
fasting) on glycemic curves in the glucose tolerance test (GTT) in the rats depending on their housing conditions. Glycemic
curves in the GTT in the rats housed under SC  (a), SI  (b), and EE  (c) conditions; maximum blood glucose level (peak) at
30  min  (d), rate of decline in the blood glucose levels in the interval from 30 to 180  min  (e), and incremental area under
the glycemic curves (iAUC)  (f). Curves: 1)  Dex vehicle; 2)  Dex. SC – standard conditions; SI – social isolation; EE – environ-
mental enrichment. Significance of differences at the level of p <  0.05: a-c) *  relative to the corresponding baseline level
(0  point on the given curve); +  relative to 30  min on the given curve; #  relative to the group “Dex vehicle” at the given
time point; d-f)*  relative to the group “SC  +  Dex vehicle”; #  relative to the EE group. Number of rats in the group  (n)  11-12.
FILARETOVA et al.1040
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Fig.  3. Effect of single administration of dexamethasone (Dex, 1  mg/kg, 24  h before testing in combination with 24-h fasting)
on hematological parameters 4  h after administration of indomethacin (IM) (a-c) or IM vehicle (d-f) in the rats depending
on their housing conditions. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, NLR (a and d); percentage of granulocytes (neutrophils) in the
total volume of leukocytes (b and e); percentage of lymphocytes in the total volume of leukocytes (c and f) after admin-
istration of IM or its vehicle. SC – standard conditions; SI – social isolation; EE – environmental enrichment. Significance
of differences at the level of p <  0.05: *  relative to the corresponding group injected with Dex vehicle; #  relative to the EE
group; +  relative to the SC group. Number of rats in the group  (n)  12.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT, DEXAMETHASONE, AND GLYCEMIC CURVE 1041
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Fig.  4. Effect of single administration of dexamethasone (Dex, 1  mg/kg, 24  h before testing in combination with 24-h fasting)
on blood glucose and corticosterone levels, and relative thymus weight 4  h after administration of indomethacin (IM)(a-c)
or IM vehicle (d-f) in the rats depending on their housing conditions. SC – standard conditions; SI – social isolation;
EE – environmental enrichment. Significance of differences at the level of p <  0.05: *  relative to the correspond-
ing group injected with Dex vehicle; #  relative to the EE group; +  relative to the SC group. Number of rats in the
group  (n)  12.
FILARETOVA et al.1042
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
Effect of a single administration of Dex on
hematological parameters after administration of
IM and its vehicle in the rats depending on their
housing conditions. In the control rats (injected with
Dex vehicle), 4  h after IM administration, the NLR in
the EE group was lower compared to that in the SI
and SC groups (Fig.  3a), which corresponded to the
lower percentage of granulocytes (Fig.  3b) and higher
percentage of lymphocytes in the rats from the EE
group compared to the corresponding indicators in
the rats from SI and SC groups (Fig.  3c). After Dex
administration, sharp increase in the NLR was ob-
served in all groups (SC, SI, EE) (Fig.  3a), which was
accompanied by the increase in the percentage of
granulocytes (Fig.  3b) and decrease in the percentage
of lymphocytes (Fig.  3c) compared to these indicators
in the control rats. It should be emphasized that the
rats from the EE group showed greater resistance to
the action of Dex compared to the rats from the SI
group (Fig.  3a), as evidenced by the lower NLR and
higher percentage of lymphocytes in the rats injected
with Dex from EE group compared to the rats from
the SI group (Fig.  3c).
In the rats that received IM vehicle instead of IM,
in all groups (SC, SI, EE), after Dex administration, a
sharp increase in the NLR was also observed, which
was accompanied by the corresponding changes in
the percentage of lymphocytes and granulocytes; and
the differences between the EE and SI groups identi-
fied after IM administration were also observed.
The control rats (injected with Dex vehicle) from
the EE group had lower NLR, higher percentage of
granulocytes, and lower percentage of lymphocytes
compared to the rats from the SI group. At the same
time, in this case, these indicators did not differ
from the corresponding indicators of the rats from
the SC group (Fig.  3,  d-f). Administration of the IM
vehicle (instead of IM) to the control rats revealed
that housing under SI conditions itself could lead to
the increase in NLR, accompanied by the decrease in
the percentage of lymphocytes and increase in the
percentage of granulocytes (Fig.  3,  d-f). After Dex ad-
ministration increase in the NLR (Fig.  3f), increase in
the percentage of granulocytes (Fig.  3d), and decrease
in the percentage of lymphocytes (Fig.  3e) were ob-
served in all groups (SC, SI, EE), with percentage of
lymphocytes in the rats from the EE group remaining
higher compared to that in the rats from the SI and
SC groups.
Thus, reproduction of the effects of Dex that
were obtained after IM administration in the rats af-
ter administration of its vehicle indicates that they
were caused by the influence of Dex, and not IM.
Single administration of Dex caused sharp increase in
the NLR in all groups of rats (SC, SI, EE). At the same
time, the rats from the EE group showed greater re-
sistance to the action of Dex compared to the rats
from the SI group: in the rats from the SI group, this
indicator was significantly higher than that in the
rats from the EE group. A higher NLR was also found
in the control rats (injected with Dex vehicle) from
the SI group after administration of the IM vehicle.
Effect of a single administration of Dex on
blood glucose and corticosterone levels, thymus
weight in the rats after administration of IM and
its vehicle depending on their housing conditions.
In the control rats (injected with Dex vehicle), 4  h
after IM administration, blood glucose levels in the
rats from the SI group were higher compared to the
levels in the rats from the SC and EE groups, which
did not differ from each other (Fig.  4a). Corticoste-
rone levels and relative thymus weight 4  h after IM
administration did not differ between the rats from
the SC, SI, and EE groups (Fig.  4, b  and  c). Dex ad-
ministration led to the increase in the blood glucose
levels (Fig.  4a), decrease in the blood corticosterone
levels (Fig.  4b), and reduction in the relative thymus
weight (Fig.  4c), with no differences found in these
indicators between the rats from the SC, SI, and EE
groups.
Similar effects were observed 4  h after adminis-
tration of the IM vehicle: in the control rats (injected
with Dex vehicle), SI itself led to the higher blood
glucose levels compared to the SC and EE groups,
which did not differ from each other (Fig.  4d), and
Dex administration also led to the increase in blood
glucose levels (Fig.  4g), decrease in the corticosterone
levels (Fig.  4e), and reduction in the relative thymus
weight (Fig.  4f).
At the same time, after administration of the
IM vehicle, effects were identified that were not
observed after IM administration. That is, 4  h after
administration of the IM vehicle, in the control rats
(injected with Dex vehicle) from different groups (SC,
SI, and EE), differences were found not only between
the blood glucose levels but also between the corti-
costerone levels (Fig.  4e): the rats housed under SI
conditions had higher corticosterone level compared
to the rats from the EE and SC groups (Fig.  4e). Addi-
tionally, administration of the IM vehicle showed that
housing under SI conditions not only itself increases
blood glucose levels but also contributes to the great-
er Dex-induced increase in the blood glucose levels
compared to the SC and EE groups (Fig.  4f), which
did not differ from each other.
Thus, matching of the main effects of Dex (in-
creased blood glucose levels and decreased corticos-
terone levels in the blood, reduced thymus weight)
obtained in the rats with IM administration and in
the rats after administration of the IM vehicle in-
dicates that they were caused by the effect of Dex.
Although in the experiments with IM administration,
ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT, DEXAMETHASONE, AND GLYCEMIC CURVE 1043
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
no dependence of these effects of Dex on the housing
conditions of rats (SC, SI, EE) was revealed, neverthe-
less, in the experiments with administration of the IM
vehicle, a higher blood glucose level was detected in
the rats from the SI group. Higher levels of glucose
and corticosterone in the blood were also found in
the rats from the SI group after administration of the
Dex vehicle.
DISCUSSION
Due to their powerful anti-inflammatory and
immunomodulatory effects, glucocorticoid hormones
are often used to treat inflammatory and autoim-
mune diseases. However, chronic exposure to these
hormones during therapy causes undesirable side ef-
fects, including hyperglycemia and insulin resistance
[19,  20]. The synthetic glucocorticoid hormone Dex,
widely used in clinical practice, is known for its par-
ticularly pronounced negative effects on carbohydrate
metabolism  [43]. In the experimental studies, multi-
ple administrations of Dex are used to model diabe-
tes [44]. The main feature of our work was studying
of the early stages of manifestation of the Dex effects
on carbohydrate metabolism after its single adminis-
tration, in combination with its pro-ulcerogenic ac-
tion, which has been demonstrated in our previous
studies  [27,  28].
According to the main result of this work, the pro-
longed (24  h) action of Dex after its single administra-
tion at a dose of 1  mg/kg, which exerts a pro-ulcero-
genic effect on the stomach, could lead to the changes
in the glycemic curve in rats, while prior housing of
rats under EE conditions could correct these changes.
Increase in the baseline of the blood glucose
levels in the fasted rats after Dex administration
(Fig.  2) that was identified in this study agrees well
with the results of our previous works  [27,  28] and
demonstrates the ability of glucocorticoid hormones
to maintain blood glucose levels  [20]. In this study,
we showed that this effect is manifested regardless
of the housing conditions of the rats: SC, SI, EE. Cat-
abolic effects of Dex demonstrated in our experiment
suggest stimulating effect of Dex on gluconeogenesis
in this case.
Comparative analysis of the glycemic curves ob-
tained in the GTT in the rats from the SC group with
administration of Dex or its vehicle indicates that
the changes in tolerance to the administered glucose
could occur 24  h after single administration of Dex
(1  mg/kg). The Dex-induced decrease in the rate of de-
cline in the blood glucose levels in the rats reflects
existence of a delay in the recovery of the blood glu-
cose levels after glucose load in these animals and
indicates impaired glucose tolerance (Fig.  2). The ob-
served decrease in the rate of glucose decline is con-
sistent with the increase in insulin resistance that
was identified in our previous study in this same
Dex model (1  mg/kg, after 24  h)  [45]. Slowdown in
the recovery of blood glucose levels in the GTT after
Dex administration was also observed in other stud-
ies, but after multiple administrations of Dex  [46,  47].
An unexpected finding is reduction in the peak
of the glycemic curve in the control rats (from the
SC group) 24  h after Dex administration, with cor-
responding decrease in the area under the curve
(Fig.  2). This distinguishes our data from the results
of the studies with multiple Dex administrations, in
which either increase in the peak or no changes were
shown  [46-48]. Possibly, the detected decrease in the
glycemic curve peak is a feature of the early stages
of Dex action. It is difficult to unambiguously inter-
pret this result with a non-standard glycemic curve.
Non-standard nature of the glycemic curve in the rats
from the SC group after Dex administration (Fig.  2a)
is manifested in the fact that, on the one hand, there
is a decrease in the peak that entails decrease in the
area under the curve, which could be interpreted as
an improvement in glucose tolerance, and, on the oth-
er hand, there is a decrease in the rate of decline in
the blood glucose level, which does not agree with
the interpretation of improved glucose tolerance. It is
also important to take into account possible inhibito-
ry effect of Dex on absorption of exogenous glucose
into the blood, which could be the cause of the peak
decrease, since Dex affects glucose transporters  [49].
This possibility is supported by the data obtained in
our previous study on the decrease in glucose absorp-
tion in the intestine 24  h after administration of Dex
at the same dose of 1  mg/kg (unpublished data, co-au-
thors A.  A.  Gruzdkov and L.  V.  Gromova, Pavlov Insti-
tute of Physiology,  RAS). Further research is needed to
clarify the cause of this effect, as well as dependence
of its manifestation on the seasons of the year.
Epidemiological studies indicate that housing
rats under SI conditions increases the risk of devel-
oping diabetes. In the animal experimental studies,
disorders of glucose homeostasis have been detected:
impaired glucose tolerance and reduced insulin sen-
sitivity  [50]. In this study, it was found that housing
rats under SI conditions is accompanied by the de-
crease in the peak of the glycemic curve in the GTT
with corresponding decrease in the area under the
curve, which could be interpreted as improvement
in glucose tolerance under these conditions, and de-
crease in the rate of decline in the blood glucose lev-
els, which does not fit well with this interpretation
(Fig.  2). It turns out that housing under SI conditions
itself led to the changes in the glycemic curve similar
to those observed after Dex administration in the rats
from the SC group. It could be assumed that this is
FILARETOVA et al.1044
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
a consequence of the prolonged action of corticoste-
rone, whose production increases under conditions of
chronic stress in the animals housed under SI condi-
tions  [51], which was also shown in this work. Dex
administration to the rats from the SI group did not
have a significant effect on the studied parameters of
the glycemic curve compared to those in the control
rats injected with the Dex vehicle.
The key task of this work was to test the pos-
sibility of correcting the Dex-induced disorders or
changes in carbohydrate metabolism through prior
housing of animals under EE conditions. Preventive
and therapeutic potential of housing animals under
EE conditions has been shown in relation to various
pathological disorders, primarily associated with the
brain functioning [34-37, 40].
Researchers actively continue to consider the
EE-type housing as an effective approach for reduc-
ing anxiety and depression, as well as for improving
memory and learning ability  [52-54]. This non-drug
approach has been also used to eliminate negative
consequences of SI housing  [54]. Effectiveness of EE
housing is also confirmed by the results of our previ-
ous studies, which differ from other works by using
an integrative approach aimed at studying function-
ing of the whole organism. According to our results,
housing rats under EE conditions increases HPA axis
stress reactivity  [39] and work capacity  [38], positively
affects overall functioning of the organism, and could
neutralize negative consequences of the SI housing on
the gastric ulceration  [38]. In this work, we continued
to study preventive potential of the EE housing.
EE housing increased resistance of the rats to
the Dex-induced changes in glycemic curve. This was
manifested in the stability of all studied parameters
(Fig.  2). When reviewing the literature, we found only
one publication devoted to studying of the effect of EE
housing on the Dex-induced disorders of glucose tol-
erance  [48]. In this work, performed with adult male
mice, impaired glucose tolerance in the GTT was de-
tected 21-day after administration of Dex at the dose
of 4  mg/kg, but housing mice under EE conditions
(4  weeks) did not affect the Dex-induced impairment
of the glucose tolerance, despite the identified posi-
tive effects on other metabolic parameters  [48].
According to the experimental design (Fig.  1), the
GTT was performed before the ulcerogenic exposure,
i.e., the results obtained in this case demonstrate
background of the state of carbohydrate metabo-
lism on which the ulcerogenic stimulus was applied:
administration of IM (35  mg/kg on the background
of fasting), which could affect the degree of IM-in-
duced ulceration. Use of the indomethacin ulcero-
genic model in this work and our previous studies
[27, 38, 55-57] is due to the clinical interests in con-
nection with ulcerogenic side effects of nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs on the gastrointestinal tract
[58]. Previously, in this same indomethacin model, we
demonstrated pro-ulcerogenic effects of Dex (with its
single administration at a dose of 1  mg/kg)  [27,  59];
mechanisms of these effects, as well as approaches to
their reduction, were studied in this work.
Unlike glycemic curves, other parameters (NLR
indicators, blood corticosterone levels, repeated blood
glucose levels, thymus weight) were evaluated after
ulcerogenic exposure (4  h after IM administration)
or control administration of the IM vehicle. It cannot
be completely ruled out that the GTT procedure had
some influence on the listed parameters, which we
plan to check in the subsequent studies. Nevertheless,
in this work, the results of our previous experiments
without prior GTT procedure were confirmed [27,
28]: the Dex-induced increase in the blood glucose
levels, inhibition of corticosterone production, thy-
mus involution, which reflect catabolic effect of the
hormone (Fig.  4). The results of experiments with ad-
ministration of the IM vehicle (instead of IM) allowed
us to conclude that the observed effects were caused
by the action of Dex itself. According to the results
of this work, housing rats under SI conditions could
lead to exacerbation of the Dex-induced increase in
the blood glucose levels, as well as to the higher lev-
els of corticosterone and glucose in the blood in the
control rats injected with the Dex vehicle (Fig.  4).
In studying the mechanisms of pro-ulcerogenic
action of Dex, we gradually introduce new possible
targets of the hormone’s action in our pro-ulcerogenic
model to understand holistic picture of what happens
in the body in this case. In this work, a new target
for us (leukocyte composition of blood) was chosen,
since it is known that therapy with glucocorticoid
hormones could lead to its change [29-32]. Glucocor-
ticoid hormones contribute to neutrophilia by moving
neutrophils into the circulating pool, inhibiting neu-
trophil migration into tissues, and enhancing their
release from the bone marrow. Simultaneously, these
hormones could lead to lymphopenia through acting
on T-lymphocytes by removing them from circulation,
limiting their release from lymphoid tissue, and trig-
gering apoptotic pathways  [60].
A new result obtained in the study of the mech-
anisms of pro-ulcerogenic action of Dex in our ex-
perimental model is the Dex-induced change in the
leukocyte composition of blood: neutrophilia and
lymphopenia with corresponding increase in NLR,
which was detected both in the experiments with IM
administration and in the experiments with inject-
ing its vehicle (Fig.  3). The Dex-induced lymphopenia
is consistent with the identified thymus involution.
Increase in the NLR after Dex administration is con-
sistent with the literature data on the effect of gluco-
corticoid hormones, including Dex, on this parameter
ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT, DEXAMETHASONE, AND GLYCEMIC CURVE 1045
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
[29-32, 60]. It should be noted that we detected this
effect after a single administration of Dex.
The NLR assessment is actively used in clinical
practice as an easily accessible prognostic marker of
systemic inflammation and a tool for determining the
risk of development and complications of various dis-
eases  [61]. High NLR is considered a risk factor for
an unfavorable outcome of diseases [30, 62-65], and
could also be an important indicator in conditions of
disrupted glucose homeostasis  [33]. Since glucocorti-
coid hormones, often used as therapy in the treatment
of many diseases, themselves lead to the increase in
NLR [29-32], it is extremely important in clinical and
veterinary practice to distinguish transient changes in
the NLR caused by the hormones from the changes
arising from the underlying pathologies  [60]. These
facts reinforce relevance of our study. We clarified
that in our case, increase in the NLR was caused
by the influence of Dex.
In this work, the possibility of using EE housing
as an approach to reduce pathological influence of
Dex on the leukocyte composition of blood was test-
ed. Although we did not identify a significant effect
of EE housing on the Dex-induced changes in the NLR
and associated parameters, nevertheless, a positive
effect of EE housing on these parameters was detect-
ed in the control rats injected with the Dex vehicle
(Fig.  3). Rats from the EE group demonstrated great-
er resistance to the action of Dex compared to the
rats from the SI group, in which maximal NLR values
were detected (Fig.  3), indicating more pronounced
disorders of the leukocyte composition of blood.
CONCLUSION
Single administration of Dex (1  mg/kg) 24  h be-
fore the GTT to the previously fasted rats could lead
to the changes in the glycemic curve (reduction in
the curve peak, decrease in the area under the curve,
and reduction in the rate of decline in blood glucose
levels compared to the control), which are difficult
to interpret unambiguously, since the changes indi-
cate both improved and impaired glucose tolerance.
The EE housing could correct the Dex-induced chang-
es in the glycemic curve by promoting resistance to
the action of Dex. Housing rats under SI conditions
itself could lead to the reduction in the peak of the
glycemic curve, decrease in the area under the curve,
and reduction in the rate of decline in the blood glu-
cose levels compared to the corresponding values in
the control rats from the SC and EE groups. At the
same time, Dex administration did not lead to further
changes in these values. A single administration of
Dex could cause a marked increase in the NLR in all
groups: SC, SI, EE. The obtained results, indicating the
effects of Dex on glycemic curves and NLR after only
its single administration, emphasize sensitivity of the
organism to the action of Dex. Housing rats under EE
conditions could prevent negative effects of a single
administration of Dex on the glycemic curve.
Abbreviations
AUC area under the curve
Dex dexamethasone
EE environmental enrichment
GTT glucose tolerance test
HPA hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical
IM indomethacin
NLR neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
SC standard conditions
SI social isolation
Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude to the senior lab-
oratory assistants of the Laboratory of Experimental
Endocrinology of the I.  P.  Pavlov Institute of Physi-
ology, Russian Academy of Sciences T.  I.  Kolbasova
and T.  I.  Kritsko and to the engineers Yu.  M.  Punin
and L.  A.  Afanasyeva for their participation in con-
ducting experiments and preparing animals for the
experiments.
Contributions
L.  P.  Filaretova: concept of the work; L.  P.  Filaretova
and N.  I.  Yarushkina: planning of experiments and su-
pervision of the work; O.  Yu.  Morozova, P.  V.  Punina,
O.  P.  Komkova, and N.  I.  Yarushkina: conducting exper-
iments; N.  I.  Yarushkina and O.  Yu.  Morozova: process-
ing of the results and preparation of figures; L.  P.  Filar-
etova, N.  I.  Yarushkina, and T.  T.  Podvigina: discussion
of the results, writing, and editing of the text.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the funds from
the federal budget within the framework of the state
assignment of the I. P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology,
Russian Academy of Sciences (PTNI no.1021062411784-
3-3.1.8, Reg. no. NIOKTR 124020100111-7).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experiments were conducted in compliance with
ethical standards approved by the legal acts of the
Russian Federation, the principles of the Basel Decla-
ration, and the recommendations of the Commission
on the Care and Use of Animals of the I.  P.  Pavlov
Institute of Physiology, RAS (Protocol No.  12/09 dated
December 9, 2024).
Conflict of interest
The authors of this work declare that they have no
conflicts of interest.
FILARETOVA et al.1046
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
REFERENCES
1. Filaretova, L. P. (2025) Modern integrative physiology: a return to the integrity of the organism [in Russian],
Usp. Fiziol. Nauk, 56, 17-33, https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034611825040023.
2. Goldstein, D. S. (2019) How does homeostasis happen? Integrative physiological, systems biological, and evo-
lutionary perspectives, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol., 316, R301-R317, https://doi.org/10.1152/
AJPREGU.00396.2018.
3. Gulyaeva, N. V. (2025) Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are promising for the treatment of brain dis-
eases: an outlook from the perspective of integrative physiology, J. Evol. Biochem. Phys., 61, 1326-1348, https://
doi.org/10.1134/S002209302505002.
4. Critchley, H. D., and Harrison, N. A. (2013) Visceral influences on brain and behavior, Neuron, 77, 624-638,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEURON.2013.02.008.
5. Dai, Y., Dou, X., Nie, B., Sun, Y., Chen, P., Fu, C., Zhang, X., Chu, Y., Gao, Q., Ge, Y., and Lin, Y. (2025) Exercise
and the organ-brain axis: regulation of neurological disorders by emerging exerkines, Pharmacol. Res., 219,
107913, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHRS.2025.107913.
6. Yapici, N. (2025) The ancient dialogue between brain and body, Curr. Biol., 35, R963-R967, https://doi.org/10.1016/
J.CUB.2025.08.069.
7. Jin, H., Li, M., Jeong, E., Castro-Martinez, F., and Zuker, C. S. (2024) A body-brain circuit that regulates body
inflammatory responses, Nature, 630, 695-703, https://doi.org/10.1038/S41586-024-07469-Y.
8. Pavlov, I. P. (1949) Lectures on the Work of the Principal Digestive Glands [in Russian], Publishing House of
the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Leningrad, 298 p.
9. Smith, G. P. (2000) Pavlov and integrative physiology, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol., 279, R743-R755,
https://doi.org/10.1152/AJPREGU.2000.279.3.R743.
10. Soty, M., Gautier-Stein, A., Rajas, F., and Mithieux, G. (2017) Gut-brain glucose signaling in energy homeostasis,
Cell Metab., 25, 1231-1242, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMET.2017.04.032.
11. Agirman, G., Yu, K. B., and Hsiao, E. Y. (2021) Signaling inflammation across the gut-brain axis, Science,
374, 1087-1092, https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ABI6087.
12. Rusch, J. A., Layden, B. T., and Dugas, L. R. (2023) Signalling cognition: the gut microbiota and
hypothalamic- pituitary-adrenal axis, Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne), 14, 1130689, https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.
2023.1130689.
13. Savulescu-Fiedler, I., Benea, S. N., Căruntu, C., Nancoff, A. S., Homentcovschi, C., and Bucurica, S. (2025) Re-
wiring the brain through the gut: insights into microbiota-nervous system interactions, Curr. Issues Mol. Biol.,
47, 489, https://doi.org/10.3390/CIMB47070489.
14. Chen, J., Xu, Y., and Cao, P. (2026) The role of the gut-brain axis in diseases, Physiology (Bethesda), 41, 109-121,
https://doi.org/10.1152/PHYSIOL.00016.2025.
15. Szabo, S., Tache, Y., and Somogyi, A. (2012) The legacy of Hans Selye and the origins of stress research:
a retrospective 75 years after his landmark brief “letter” to the editor of nature, Stress, 15, 472-478, https://
doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2012.710919.
16. De Kloet, E. R. (2024) Coping with the multifaceted and multifunctional role of cortisol in the brain, Neurosci.
Appl., 3, 10404, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NSA.2024.104047.
17. Filaretova, L., and Bagaeva, T. (2016) The realization of the brain-gut interactions with corticotro-
pin-releasing factor and glucocorticoids, Curr. Neuropharmacol., 14, 876-881, https://doi.org/10.2174/
1570159x146661606140942341.
18. De Kloet, E. R., Joëls, M., and Holsboer, F. (2005) Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease, Nat. Rev.
Neurosci., 6, 463-475, https://doi.org/10.1038/NRN1683.
19. Kuo, T., McQueen, A., Chen, T. C., and Wang, J. C. (2015) Regulation of glucose homeostasis by glucocorticoids,
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 872, 99-126, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2895-8_5.
20. Chang, M., and Wang, J. C. (2026) Hepatic glucocorticoid receptor action and glucose homeostasis, Endocr. Rev.,
47, 52-74, https://doi.org/10.1210/ENDREV/BNAF03.
21. Filaretova, L. (2017) Gastroprotective effect of stress preconditioning: involvement of glucocorticoids, Curr.
Pharm. Des., 23, 3923-3927, https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612823666170215145125.
22. Filaretova, L. P., Filaretov, A. A., and Makara, G. B. (1998) Corticosterone increase inhibits stress-induced gastric
erosions in rats, Am. J. Physiol., 274, G1024-G1030, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1998.274.6.G1024.
23. Filaretova, L. P., Bagaeva, T. R., Amagase, K., and Takeuchi, K. (2008) Contribution of glucocorticoids to protec-
tive influence of preconditioning mild stress against stress-induced gastric erosions, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1148,
209-212, https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1410.005.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT, DEXAMETHASONE, AND GLYCEMIC CURVE 1047
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
24. Filaretova, L., Bagaeva, T., and Morozova, O. (2012) Stress and the stomach: corticotropin-releasing factor may
protect the gastric mucosa in stress through involvement of glucocorticoids, Cell Mol. Neurobiol., 32, 829-836,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-012-9800-z.
25. Filaretova, L. (2006) The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system: hormonal brain-gut interaction and gas-
troprotection, Auton. Neurosci., 125, 86-93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2006.01.005.
26. Filaretova, L. (2025) The HPA axis as a key gastroprotecive player in brain-gut interactions, Acta Physiol., 241,
S735.
27. Filaretova, L., Podvigina, T., Bagaeva, T., and Morozova, O. (2009) Dual action of glucocorticoid hormones
on the gastric mucosa: how the gastroprotective action can be transformed to the ulcerogenic one, Inflam-
mopharmacology, 17, 15-22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-008-8046-3.
28. Filaretova, L., Podvigina, T., Bagaeva, T., and Morozova, O. (2014) From gastroprotective to ulcerogenic effects
of glucocorticoids: role of long-term glucocorticoid action, Curr. Pharm. Des., 20, 1045-1050, https://doi.org/
10.2174/13816128113199990419.
29. Podvigina, T. T., Morozova, O. Yu., Bagaeva, T. R., and Filaretova, L. P. (2018) Development of insulin resistance
after prolonged exposure to glucocorticoid hormones as one of the mechanisms underlying the transformation
of their gastroprotective effect into a proulcerogenic effect [in Russian], Ross. Fiziol. Zhurn. Im I.  M.  Sechenova,
104, 493-505.
30. Panesar, N. S. (2008) What caused lymphopenia in SARS and how reliable is the lymphokine status in gluco-
corticoid-treated patients? Med. Hypotheses, 71, 298-301, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEHY.2008.03.019.
31. Lo, Y. T., Lim, V. Y., Ng, M., Tan, Y. H., Chiang, J., Chang, E. W. Y., Chan, J. Y., Poon, E. Y. L., Somasundaram, N.,
Bin Harunal Rashid, M. F., Tao, M., Lim, S. T., and Yang, V. S. (2022) A prognostic model using post-steroid
neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts overall survival in primary central nervous system lymphoma, Cancers
(Basel), 14, 1818, https://doi.org/10.3390/CANCERS14071818.
32. Ronchetti, S., Ricci, E., Migliorati,G., Gentili, M., and Riccardi, C. (2018) How glucocorticoids affect the neutrophil
life, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19, 4090, https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS191240900.
33. Nkuhairwe, I. N., Esterhuizen, T. M., Sigwadhi, L. N., Tamuzi, J. L., Machekano, R., and Nyasulu, P. S. (2024)
Estimating the causal effect of dexamethasone versus hydrocortisone on the neutrophil- lymphocyte ratio in
critically ill COVID-19 patients from Tygerberg Hospital ICU using TMLE method, BMC Infect Dis., 24, 1365,
https://doi.org/10.1186/S12879-024-10112-W.
34. Yang, G., Yan, R., Tong, H., Zhang, J., Chen, B., Xue, X., Wang, J., Chu, M., Jin, S., and Li, M. (2018) Chronic
oscillating glucose challenges disarrange innate immune homeostasis to potentiate the variation of neutrophil-
lymphocyte ratio in rats with or without hidden diabetes mellitus, Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes., 11, 277-288,
https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S160301.
35. Wang, H., Liang, Q., Wen, Z., Ma, W., Ji, S., Zhang, H., and Zhang, X. (2025) Enriched environment alleviates
NLRP3 inflammasome mediated neuroinflammation in diabetes complicated with depression rats, Sci. Rep., 15,
14214, https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-025-98312-5.
36. Bondi, C. O., Capeci, H. E., Donald, H. M., O’Brien, M. L., Moschonas, E. H., and Kline, A. E. (2026) A decade
of progress (2014-2025): environmental enrichment as a validated preclinical model of neurorehabilitation for
traumatic brain injury, Neural Regen. Res., https://doi.org/10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-25-01392.
37. Lee, J. M., Choi, Y. J., Sung, D.-E., Yeo, S. G., and Kim, Y.-J. (2026) Environmental enrichment attenuates aging-in-
duced BBB disruption and cognitive impairment with activation of FNDC5/irisin signaling, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 27,
1652, https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS27041652.
38. Rusciano, D., Gagliano, C., Avitabile, A., and Maya-Vetencourt, J. F. (2026) Environmental enrichment as a mito-
chondria-targeting systems strategy across neurodegenerative diseases and retinal dystrophies, Front. Neurosci.,
20, 1744873, https://doi.org/10.3389/FNINS.2026.1744873.
39. Filaretova, L. P., Komkova, O. P., Morozova, O. Y., Punina, P. V., and Yarushkina, N. I. (2024) Environmental en-
richment reverses proulcerogenic action of social isolation on the gastric mucosa and positively influences pain
sensitivity and work capacity, Inflammopharmacology, 32, 909-915, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10787-024-01451-W.
40. Yarushkina, N. I., Zenko, M. Y., Morozova, O. Y., Komkova, O.P., Baranova, K. A., Zhuikova, S.E., Rybnikova,E. A.,
and Filaretova, L. P. (2024) The influence of social isolation and enriched environment on the activity of the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis, pain sensitivity, and behavior in rats after exposure to an
ulcerogenic stressor, J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol., 60, 1857-1872, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WNR.0000069062.85441.29.
41. Sale, A., Berardi, N., and Maffei, L. (2014) Environment and brain plasticity: towards an endogenous pharma-
cotherapy, Physiol. Rev., 94, 189-234, https://doi.org/10.1152/PHYSREV.00036.2012.
42. Wolever, T. M. S., Jenkins, D. J. A., Jenkins, A. L., and Josse, R. G. (1991) The glycemic index: methodology and
clinical implications, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 54, 846-854, https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCN/54.5.846.
FILARETOVA et al.1048
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
43. Sandoval, D. A., Ping, L., Neill, A. R., Morrey, S., and Davis, S. N. (2003) Cortisol acts through central mecha-
nisms to blunt counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in conscious rats, Diabetes, 52, 2198-2204, https://
doi.org/10.2337/DIABETES.52.9.2198.
44. Kim, M. S., Brunette, M., Romoff, M., Wu, H.-H., Hashmi, S., Park, D. Y., Lee, Y.-P., Bhatia, N., and Mills, E. (2026)
Impact of perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative complications in diabetic patients undergoing spine
surgery, North Am. Spine Soc. J., 25, 100847, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.XNSJ.2026.100847.
45. Hamed, A. M., Elbahy, D. A., Ahmed, A. R., Thabet, S. A., Refaei, R. A., Ragab, I., Elmahdy, S. M., Osman, A. S.,
and Abouelella, A. M. (2024) Comparison of the efficacy of curcumin and its nano formulation on dexameth-
asone-induced hepatic steatosis, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia in Wistar rats, Heliyon, 10, e41043, https://
doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E41043.
46. Wego, M. T., Poualeu Kamani, S. L., Miaffo, D., Nchouwet, M. L., Kamanyi, A., and Wansi Ngnokam, S. L. (2019)
Protective effects of aqueous extract of baillonella toxisperma stem bark on dexamethasone-induced insulin
resistance in rats, Adv. Pharmacol. Sci., 2019, 8075163, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8075163.
47. Alsaedi, A. Q., Nader, M. A., El-Kashef, D. H., and Abdelmageed, M. E. (2025) Mangiferin mitigates dexametha-
sone-induced insulin resistance in rats: insight into vascular dysfunction and hepatic steatosis, Front. Pharma-
col., 16, 1572758, https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHAR.2025.1572758.
48. Delanogare, E., de Souza, R. M., Rosa, G. K., Guanabara, F. G., Rafacho, A., and Moreira, E. L. G. (2020) Enriched
environment ameliorates dexamethasone effects on emotional reactivity and metabolic parameters in mice,
Stress, 23, 466-473, https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2020.1735344.
49. Visvanathan, R., Houghton, M. J., Barber, E., Day, K., Kellow, N. J., and Williamson, G. (2025) Dexamethasone
enhances intestinal glucose absorption and TMPRSS2 expression with implications for hyperglycaemia and in-
fection risk, Sci. Rep., 15, 38329, https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-025-22312-8.
50. Chen, K., Wu, C., You, Y., Zhao, L., Cao, Y., Ma, X., Wang, G., Tao, Z., Qiu, M., Su, M., Huo, K., and Luo, J.
(2025) Social isolation promotes hyperglycemia through sympathetic activation of inguinal white adipose tissue,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 782, 152582, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBRC.2025.152582.
51. Krupina, N. A., and Shirenova, S. D. (2023) Cognitive impairment under prolonged social isolation: insights
from human studies and animal experiments [in Russian], Progr. Physiol. Sci., 54, 18-35, https://doi.org/
10.31857/S0301179823040045.
52. Braun, M. D., Kisko, T. M., Witt, S. H., Rietschel, M., Schwarting, R. K. W., and Wöhr, M. (2019) Long-term en-
vironmental impact on object recognition, spatial memory and reversal learning capabilities in Cacna1c-haplo-
insufficient rats, Hum. Mol. Genet., 28, 4113-4131, https://doi.org/10.1093/HMG/DDZ235.
53. Wang, H., Xu, X., Xu, X., Gao, J., and Zhang, T. (2020) Enriched environment and social isolation affect cognition
ability via altering excitatory and inhibitory synaptic density in mice hippocampus, Neurochem. Res., 45, 2417-
2432, https://doi.org/10.1007/S11064-020-03102-2.
54. Guven, E. B., Pranic, N. M., and Unal, G. (2022) The differential effects of brief environmental enrichment
following social isolation in rats, Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 22, 818-832, https://doi.org/10.3758/S13415-
022-00989-Y.
55. Filaretova, L. (2013) Gastroprotective role of glucocorticoids during NSAID-induced gastropathy, Curr. Pharm.
Des., 19, 29-33, https://doi.org/10.2174/13816128130106.
56. Filaretova, L., Tanaka, A., Miyazawa, T., Kato, S., and Takeuchi, K. (2002) Mechanisms by which endogenous
glucocorticoid protects against indomethacin-induced gastric injury in rats, Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver
Physiol., 283, 1082-1089, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00189.2002.
57. Filaretova, L. P., Morozova, O. Y., and Yarushkina, N. I. (2021) Peripheral corticotropin-releasing hormone may
protect the gastric musosa against indometacin-induced injury through involvement of glucocorticoids, J. Physiol.
Pharmacol., 72, 771-720, https://doi.org/10.26402/JPP.2021.5.06.
58. Huang, X., Fang, Q., Zhou, L., Gong, C., and Pei, D. (2026) Comparing the efficacy and safety of medications
to prevent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers in high-risk patients: a network meta-analysis,
Dig. Liver. Dis., 58, 197-205, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DLD.2025.11.012.
59. Filaretova, L., Morozova, O., Punina, P., Komkova, O., Podvigina, T., and Yarushkina, N. (2026) The prolonged
action of dexamethasone, which exerts a proulcerogenic effect on the stomach, is accompanied by alterations
in the glycemic curve and an increase in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, Physiology, 41, S1, https://doi.org/
10.1152/physiol.2026.41.S1.2298421.
60. Hendrikx, A. L., Vendrig, J. C., Gehring, R., van den Boom, R., van Alphen, J., Vernooij, J. C. M., Teske, E.,
and Roelfsema, E. (2026) Repeated intravenous dexamethasone administration causes transient changes in
leukocyte parameters in healthy warmblood horses, Am. J. Vet. Res., 24, 1-10, https://doi.org/10.2460/AJVR.
25.10.0371.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT, DEXAMETHASONE, AND GLYCEMIC CURVE 1049
BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) Vol. 91 No. 6 2026
61. Buonacera, A., Stancanelli, B., Colaci, M., and Malatino, L. (2022) Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio: an emerg-
ing marker of the relationships between the immune system and diseases, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 3636, https://
doi.org/10.3390/IJMS23073636.
62. Yontar, G., and Mutlu, E. A. (2024) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios and systemic im-
mune-inflammation index in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder, BMC Psychiatry, 24, 966, https://
doi.org/10.1186/S12888-024-06439-Y.
63. Fang, L., Zhu, J., and Fu, D. (2025) Predictive value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for all-cause mortality in
patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Pulm. Med.,
25, 206, https://doi.org/10.1186/S12890-025-03677-Y.
64. Petramala, L., Circosta, F., Cremonesi, L., Menichelli, D., Cimò, A., Servello, A., Anastasi, E., Marino, L., and
Letizia, C. (2025) Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and subclinical atherosclerosis in essential hypertensive patients,
Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 12, 1579930, https://doi.org/10.3389/FCVM.2025.1579930.
65. Damarlapally, N., Vempati, R., Mourad, D., Vasudevan, S. S., Mathur, G., Khan, A., Banda, P., Polamarasetty, H.,
Chauhan, S., Manjappachar, N., Bhatti, T., and Desai, R. (2026) Association of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio with
all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis,
World J. Methodol., 16, 106277, https://doi.org/10.5662/WJM.V16.I1.1062777.
Publishers Note. Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affiliations. AI tools may have been used in the translation or editing of this article.